Orbit Post Sitemap
BTCFi is the only public chain in the BTCFi sector that has deployed quantum-resistant technology. What is the valuation of the Core chain?
Quantum computing threats are becoming a long-term foundational security issue for public chains. The Bitcoin community is still at the theoretical discussion stage; the BIP quantum-resistant proposal remains a draft and has not yet been implemented in an official roadmap. In contrast, Core, as a public chain in the BTCFi sector, is the first to disclose its quantum-resistant defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously—one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other employing a post-quantum signature algorithm. If future quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signatures, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering dual protection.
The core logic: quantum threats do not attack the ledger itself but target the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining power will not be directly compromised by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. This Core upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid asset theft risks caused by future quantum computers breaking keys.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. First phase: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Second phase: support hybrid signature transactions, allowing old and new addresses to coexist in parallel, enabling users to switch independently;
3. Third phase: gradually promote quantum-resistant addresses to complete the overall network migration. $SAND perpetual 50x short position, opened at 0.07388, currently 0.06881, floating profit +343.12%.
The idea is very simple: a top horizontal consolidation with volume but stagnant price, volatility crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have loosened. A single high-volume bearish candle smashed the price down from 0.073, a typical breakdown signal, shorting is favored over longing. 50x leverage, stop loss at 0.076. The trend is continuously downward, giving no comfortable exit points.
At this position, I plan to take profit on half of the position first, and move the stop loss of the remaining half up to 0.07 to let profits run. If 0.065 is broken down with volume, continue holding; if not, close all positions. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 Currently, I personally believe that Bitcoin $BTC and Ethereum $ETH are more suitable to focus on shorting opportunities, with key levels around $87,000 and $2,800 respectively.
Why am I so firm about this now? 👇
First and foremost, the most important factor is that U.S. Treasury yields remain high!
Even if there is positive news, the market will quickly be suppressed.$BTC, 1M At the moment, price has reclaimed 2Y rVWAP & Two-Year PP 84.1K, and for confirmation we need to see current month close above it. Reclaiming and holding this confluence opens the way toward targets above at R1, R2–R3, where TL is also running Previously, I presented a number of arguments that increased probability that bottom was in 50–60K area, where we had confluence of supports: long-term 7-year TL, VWAP from '22 uptrend, bullish monthly OB and UO signaling oversold conditions. Now$MUBARAK perpetual 20x long position, opened at 0.063765, now at 0.074466, floating profit +335.63%.
The logic is very simple: repeatedly bottoming around 0.063, each dip is quickly recovered, the wicks get shorter and shorter, and selling pressure is clearly exhausted. Wait for a volume breakout above 0.068, confirm on the right side, then add more longs. 20x leverage, stop loss at 0.06. The rally is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Now move the stop loss to 0.072 to lock in profits. If there is a volume breakout above 0.08, you can hold for more. $SNDK $HYPE #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $BTC 📈
Stupid PA continues... price wandering around like me after 10 beers looking for the kebab shop.
Hard to find a good reason for this latest move back above mrVAH, after price lost key support at mrVAH earlier today.
No real intent from perps yet.
No real spot participation yet.
But also no defense from passive sellers, with price simply walking through resistance as shorts keep covering. Quantum Security = BTCFi's Ultimate Narrative? Core Chain's Move Is Huge
The quantum computing threat is becoming a long-term foundational security issue in the crypto community. The Bitcoin community is still at the theoretical discussion stage and has not yet implemented a formal anti-quantum roadmap, while Core is the first to disclose an anti-quantum defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously, one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other equipped with a post-quantum signature algorithm. If future quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signature, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering dual protection.
Core logic: The quantum threat does not attack the ledger itself but targets the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining power will not be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. Core's upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid asset theft risks caused by quantum computers breaking keys in the future.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. Phase one: Add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Phase two: Support hybrid signature transactions, with old and new addresses coexisting in parallel, allowing users to switch independently;
3. Phase three: Gradually promote anti-quantum addresses to complete the overall network migration.
Objective reminder: This is currently only a planned roadmap and has not yet launched on the mainnet. Large-scale commercial use of quantum computers is a long-term event, representing early layout for long-term security infrastructure.$CT perpetual 20x short position, opened at 0.4828, currently 0.3982, floating profit +350.45%.
Didn't overthink it: the previous consolidation lasted long enough, the 0.48 level was repeatedly confirmed as valid, the top pattern is very clear. Entered as soon as a high-volume bearish candle appeared, following the trend not the sentiment. 20x leverage, stop loss at 0.50. The drop was fast and steady, giving no chance for a second entry.
Locked in a safety cushion at 0.42 first. My personal judgment is that there will be support around 0.35; then I'll decide whether to exit or hold based on volume, without guessing the bottom in advance. $SOL $DOGE #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $CORE $CORE $CORE Price weakness ≠ decentralization is just a slogan, don't mix these two things together
In discussions, one viewpoint is very practical: even if the chain cannot be tampered with, when large holders unlock and dump, the price drops and retail investors still lose money; chain security does not equal price security. I fully agree with this.
Price fluctuations are determined by market funds, bull and bear cycles, and the rhythm of chip release. No crypto project can guarantee a continuously rising price, and CORE naturally faces this issue, with the selling pressure risk from large locked positions maturing, which everyone needs to be aware of.
But the core of our discussion—decentralization—is defined as whether a few people can tamper with on-chain transactions or control the entire public chain. This concept has never included "guaranteeing the price won't fall."
Take Bitcoin as an example: price crashes in bear markets and large whales selling are normal, but no one says Bitcoin's decentralization is just a slogan because of price drops.
A quiet ecosystem is a shortcoming CORE currently needs to address, which belongs to the ecosystem construction level; large holders unlocking and dumping is a secondary market trading risk; underlying network decentralization is about the public chain ledger security level. These three are independent and cannot be lumped together.
The ecosystem needs continuous development, market risks cannot be ignored, but the decentralization progress of the underlying network cannot be denied based solely on market performance. Everyone is welcome to discuss rationally. Single Coin Transaction Linkage｜Last 15 Minutes
$CT contract's final segment transactions differ from the entire segment: the entire segment spot/contract active buy-in rates are 89.0%/39.4%; the contract's final segment is 40.2%. The final segment has shifted to nearly balanced buying and selling, so the same-direction or opposite-direction labels for the entire segment do not represent the transaction relationship at the end of the window.CL price has now returned to around $86,400, indicating that there were indeed buyers around the $84,000–$85,000 range earlier, so the money hasn't left. But there's a detail to note: as the price moves up, the contract open interest has reached about 97,761 BTC, and the funding rate has risen to around +0.008%. Simply put, some people have already started betting on a continued rise in advance. $SPCX perpetual 75x long position, opened at 159.02, now at 171.17, floating profit +573.04%.
The idea is very simple: the bottom consolidates with extremely low volume, volatility is crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have settled. A single volume-increasing bullish candle directly pulls the price up from 159, a typical start signal, go long, not short. 75x leverage, stop loss at 155. The trend is continuously upward, giving no comfortable entry point.
At this position, I plan to first reduce half of the position to take profits, and move the stop loss of the remaining half up to 168 to let profits run. If 180 can be broken with volume and hold, continue holding; if not, exit completely. $ZEC $SOL #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $ZEC suddenly surged nearly 2% in the early session, making one suspect it might be a short squeeze trap. However, it turned down without even touching the 7-day moving average at 1391, indicating that the resistance above remains. The rebound below the moving average can only be considered a weak recovery, not a trend reversal.
Futures open interest shrank by nearly 20% over the week, with leveraged funds clearly retreating, mainly due to profit-taking by the bulls leading to position reduction. Although the chips have lightened, the bearish structure remains unchanged.
Continue to maintain a bearish outlook, first watching if 1215 can be broken; if the price pulls back up to 1440, then follow the discipline to stop loss.Sometimes you really can't blame the whales for dumping; if I were them, I'd run even faster. 😂
An ancient whale from an ETH ICO, after being silent for 6 months, transferred 13,330 ETH, worth about $36.37 million, to Coinbase.
He bought 170,000 ETH back then at $0.31 each, costing just over $50,000.
How much is it worth now?
$460 million. 😂
I'm not afraid whether this whale sells or not; what I really want to see is:
Can ETH hold up against such a huge profit-taking pressure? Quantum computers will break Bitcoin in 3 years? Core chain has secretly set up this "quantum firewall"
The threat of quantum computing is gradually entering the field of public chain developers. The market has optimistic estimates: quantum computers capable of breaking elliptic curve encryption may be realized in about 3 years at the earliest. The Bitcoin community is still discussing solutions and has not yet launched an official anti-quantum roadmap, while Core has taken the lead in disclosing its anti-quantum defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously, one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other equipped with a post-quantum signature algorithm. If quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signature in the future, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering two-way protection.
The core logic: the quantum threat does not attack the ledger itself, but the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining computing power will not be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. Core's upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid the risk of asset theft caused by quantum computers breaking keys in the future.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. First phase: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Second phase: support hybrid signature transactions, with old and new addresses coexisting in parallel, allowing users to switch independently;
3. Third phase: gradually promote anti-quantum addresses and complete the overall network migration. $FIL perpetual 50x long position, opened at 1.0623, now at 1.1969, floating profit +633.64%.
The logic is very simple: repeatedly bottoming around 1.06, each dip is quickly recovered, the wicks get shorter and shorter, and selling pressure clearly weakens. Wait for a volume breakout above 1.10, confirm on the right side, then go long. 50x leverage, stop loss at 1.05. The rally is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Now move the stop loss to 1.18 to lock in profits. If volume breaks above 1.25, you can hold on for more. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 ARB surged onto CoinGecko's trending list, but the price only rose by 3.4%
ARB surged onto CoinGecko's trending list, but the price only increased by +3.4% — $ARB current price is 0.21, the hype hasn't turned into money yet. No detours in direction: I am bullish at this position.
Daily RSI is 57.3, moderately strong but not overbought; short-term moving averages are in a bullish alignment, MA7 is above MA30; funding rate is 0.0001 near zero, leverage hasn't ignited, this move is driven by spot buying alone. The only flaw is OI down -3.86%, contract positions are withdrawing — for the hype to turn into real gains, spot volume must take over, but 24h trading volume is 15,465,533 USDT, volume ratio 0.424 is still shrinking, so trade position for safety, not enthusiasm for catching the dip.
Resistance above: 0.2111
Support below: 0.1952
Fear and Greed Index at 70, sentiment leans greedy, market phase judged as offensive, risk preference is risk_on. Execution path is straightforward: enter directly at current price 0.21, cut losses if it breaks below 0.1952; hold if a strong volume surge candle closes above 0.2111 for extension. Entry and stop-loss levels are fixed in advance, no last-minute changes.
Follow me, so you won't get lost in the next market move.
$ARB $BTCNo operation, no analysis, just relying on luck; I feel embarrassed even to share this record. While everyone else was still watching, $SHAZ was under high-level pressure, volume didn't keep up, and sell orders piled up layer after layer above. I directly warned not to chase SHAZ, and short positions could look for a pullback.
Just after lunch when I checked the market, it was still oscillating repeatedly, with each rebound weaker than the last, insufficient support, heavy signs of a bull trap. The short positions around 48.77 were taken with peace of mind.
Now 48.07 is right in front of us, with a return of +15.58%. Those on board should be waking up smiling. Pocket the big gains first, close 80% of the position, keep the remaining 20% at cost price as protection. If it continues to drop, let the profits run; if it rebounds, don't give back what you've gained.
The premise of compounding is survival; the shortcut to getting rich quick often leads to zero.
Hold on if the trend is intact; run if it breaks. Don't fall in love with stocks.
For friends who haven't gotten on board yet, listen to me: the market is not short of opportunities, but it lacks patience. Wait for a more comfortable position in the next round, and I will notify you immediately.
$BTC $SNDK BTC is not panicking yet, Core chain takes the lead: Quantum-resistant upgrade roadmap revealed for the first time
The threat of quantum computing is gradually entering the field of public chain developers. The Bitcoin community is still continuously discussing quantum-resistant solutions and has not yet finalized an official roadmap, while Core has taken the lead in disclosing its quantum-resistant defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously, one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other using a post-quantum signature algorithm. If future quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signature, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering dual protection.
The core logic: the quantum threat does not attack the ledger itself, but the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining power will not be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. This Core upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid asset theft risks caused by future quantum computers breaking keys.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. First phase: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Second phase: support hybrid signature transactions, with old and new addresses coexisting in parallel, allowing users to switch independently;
3. Third phase: gradually promote quantum-resistant addresses to complete the overall network migration. It is worth noting: this is currently only a planned roadmap and has not yet been launched on the mainnet. Large-scale commercial use of quantum computers is still a long-term event; this is a proactive measure 87000 is just the first level? The next target for Bitcoin is 89500
$BTC has recently been oscillating in a small range, but the lows are gradually rising, with support moving up to around 83700. The downward space is getting narrower and narrower, showing strong signs of sideways movement instead of a drop.
The weekly candle closed with a small bullish candle, and after the daily MACD death cross, the fast and slow lines are tangled without diverging downward; instead, a golden cross could happen at any time. The 4-hour chart already shows a golden cross above the water line.
Currently stuck at the 87000 resistance level, but the willingness to fall is weak—if it should fall, it hasn't yet, so watch for a potential upward breakout. 87000 is very likely to be taken out, and the previous head and shoulders neckline has moved up to 89500, which is the major resistance.
Most short positions in the market are placed between 89000 and 90000. If 89500 breaks, it is very likely to continue sweeping liquidity above, with a spike reaching 91000 or even 92000.
$BTC $ETH $SOL87000 is not the target; it's where others place their orders
$BTC is currently stuck below 87000.
$ETH is fluctuating around 2700, and $ZEC is holding at 1300.
What does this price level mean:
87000 is not a randomly drawn line.
The order density is highest at the round number threshold; every surge is pushed back immediately.
Who is placing orders here:
Sell orders were placed early, waiting for the buying volume chasing in.
Before a breakout, repeated attempts are normal.
Looking further down, a breakout requires more than just sentiment.
It needs real volume and actual money to push it up.
Without volume, multiple surges are futile.
Wait for a volume spike closing above 87000 before discussing direction.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
#VanEck：比特币或继续扩大市场份额 #Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 $BTC $ETH #Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元，真正火起来的可能不只是SOL.
An important data point has emerged: In September, the trading volume of tokenized stocks on the Solana chain reached $4.4 billion, setting a new monthly record. Platforms like Raydium and Orca have become the main trading venues.
What does this mean?
In the past, when people mentioned Solana, they mostly thought of MEME, DeFi, and high-frequency on-chain trading.
But now, more and more traditional stocks are being moved onto the chain.
Stocks can be traded 24/7, and settlement can also be completed directly on-chain. Recently, U.S. regulators have provided clearer policy space for tokenized stock trading.
So the significance of this $4.4 billion is not just a new trading volume high.
It’s more like a signal:
Solana is moving from being a "crypto asset trading chain" toward becoming an "infrastructure for traditional asset tokenization."
If RWA continues to expand, what’s truly worth watching for SOL is not just the coin price, but how much real assets and real transactions the chain can actually support.
What the market needs to verify next might be:
Is $4.4 billion just a temporary hype, or the starting point for Solana’s next growth phase?
#Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元 $SOL If BAL can enable nodes to prefetch state, its greatest value might be in reducing tail latency.
When discussing block-level access lists, people often focus on average execution speed, but what nodes really fear are the few extremely slow blocks. Irregular database access, cache misses, or contracts touching a large amount of scattered state can all prolong validation time. BAL exposes the accounts and storage keys a block will access in advance to the execution client, allowing nodes to prefetch data before actual execution, reducing the waiting time caused by searching around the disk temporarily.
This does not mean every block will speed up by the same margin. When the state is already in memory, the benefit of prefetching may be minimal; when the list is larger or network transmission is slower, it may even add extra overhead. What really matters to measure is tail latency: under high load, weaker hardware, and different database configurations, whether the slowest batch of blocks can more easily complete validation within the time limit. A nice average but frequent timeouts on extreme samples will still cause the network to favor high-end nodes.
For the long-term value of $ETH, a stable validation window is more important than advertised peak performance. As long as home nodes can continue to independently verify blocks after throughput increases, scaling does not sacrifice the breadth of validators. BAL is not a new feature users can directly click on, but it may determine whether higher capacity is ultimately validated by more people together or barely sustained by a few infrastructure providers.🔷 5 reasons for the $BTC rally and 5 against
FOR growth:
Probability of Fed rate hike <20%
ETFs attracted $2.4B in 5 days
Crypto market is small, inflows have strong impact
Open interest -20%, fewer liquidations
October historically: +17-20%
AGAINST growth:
Bonds >5%, rate is high
Brent $105, fueling inflation
Supply zone $83-86K
Classic cycle: ATH was in October 2025
ETF demand is unstable, volumes are low
🧠 Main question: have ETFs broken the old cycle model?
❓ Have ETFs broken the cycle model?👇I was really stunned for a few seconds when I just saw Kalshi's new round of financing valuation.
$40 billion.
Last December, its valuation was only $11 billion, it rose to $22 billion in March this year, and now the latest round is talking about $40 billion, almost doubling again in about half a year. Even more outrageous, Polymarket on the other side is also raising funds at a valuation of about $21 billion.
I used to think prediction markets were still a rather niche play in the crypto world, where people bet on elections, interest rates, sports games — fun but still far from a real big business.
But now the data is a bit different.
By August this year, Kalshi's cumulative trading volume has exceeded $40 billion, expanding nearly 4 times in half a year; Bloomberg disclosed materials showing its annualized revenue run rate was already close to $4 billion, with a gross margin of about 90%.
What's more interesting is that it is no longer satisfied with just competing with Polymarket on "who predicts more accurately," but wants to move toward a bigger exchange direction, even traditional exchanges like CME and ICE are being used as benchmarks.
I finally somewhat understand why Hyperliquid has recently started doing Outcome Market as well.
This track is no longer just "crypto people casually betting a few rounds." At this point, the account has directly dropped to 10.11U, and today I lost 12% in one go; my mindset has been completely worn down by ETH.
$ETH's trend is really frustrating. While BTC keeps surging repeatedly, it’s stuck oscillating between 2680 and 2740, totally out of sync. Several times it tried to break up, touching 2749 before being slammed back down. The bulls have no strength, the bears can’t push it down deeply, so it just stubbornly moves sideways, draining patience.
All the market funds are piling into BTC; Ethereum isn’t getting any incremental capital support, so it can only passively fluctuate following BTC. The Fed meeting minutes are about to be released, and everyone is watching cautiously; no one wants to take the initiative to push the market now.
The bulls are hoping for a breakout above 2750 to open up upward space, while the bears are waiting for a drop below 2680 to start a pullback. Both sides are just enduring. This kind of choppy market is the most torturous, sweeping stop losses back and forth. No matter long or short, holding for a bit too long means getting hit.
Only after losing did I realize: when BTC is strong, don’t stubbornly fight the number two. Until rotation happens, no matter how much you hold on, it’s hard to see a big move.
Follow your big bro here, those who understand will understand.
#ETHSidewaysChurnsPatience
#FundsPileIntoBTCEthereumLags
#WaitingForFedMinutesToBreakRangeIn the past couple of days, I saw the NEAR Intents situation, and my first reaction was: Isn't this storyline a bit too crypto-world?
Just a moment ago, everyone was praising it.
During the Bitget hack fund flow, the $NEAR Intents related system was discussed because it intercepted abnormal funds. But just a few days later, on October 1st, it had its own security incident, with preliminary losses of about 3.8 million USD.
The problem was in the interaction between Omni's deposit and withdrawal infrastructure and the NEAR Intents smart contract, not the NEAR mainnet itself being breached. After the incident, services were directly suspended, and deposits and withdrawals on 11 chains including BSC, Polygon, and Optimism were affected for a time. The team also promised full compensation for user losses.
The most dramatic part came afterward.
On-chain tracking showed the hacker transferred some funds to KuCoin, then converted them to $BTC; Aurora co-founder Alex Shevchenko then publicly called out, saying the attacker’s identity was confirmed and gave 48 hours to return the money.
Then the even more unbelievable happened: by October 2nd, CoinDesk updated that the attacker had returned all the stolen assets.
So now when I read on-chain security news, my mindset has changed.
Before, seeing “hacker stole 3.8 million”:
It’s over, another one lost.
Now:
Hold on, wait two days to see if it turns into “Bro, your money’s back, don’t report it”😭MetaMask took an action these past couple of days, and when I first saw it, I thought the data was wrong.
Nearly 17,000 $ETH $ETH validators suddenly started exiting.
On-chain statistics show that about 16,965 validators have exited or are in the queue to exit.
Seeing such a large exit volume normally, the first reaction would definitely be:
Who’s selling? 😭
But MetaMask came out to explain.
On September 30, they discovered a security incident in some of their infrastructure, so they proactively initiated validator exits as a precautionary measure. So far, no direct threat to the MetaMask wallet itself has been found.
I find this quite interesting.
Previously, when I saw ETH validator exit queues, I usually thought about the market: whether stakers were preparing to cash out, or if there would be a new wave of potential sell pressure.
But this time, so many exited at once, and the reason behind it was security risk control.
It also reminded me of something:
In the future, when we see sudden changes in staking data, we really can’t just look at "how much ETH is about to come out."
We also need to see who is exiting and why.
Because 17,000 validators represent a considerable scale, but "proactively withdrawing nodes to avoid risk" and "validators preparing to sell coins" are completely different things.
Currently, MetaMask has not found any direct risk to wallets, so I won’t interpret this as a huge ETH sell-off signal for now.
I’m more inclined to wait for them to fully review the September 30 incident.
After all, for MetaMask to withdraw nearly 17,000 validators at once...
This scale of "just a precaution" is indeed quite large 😭
For personal organization only, not investment advice, DYOR.CORE Hard Fork: Review of the Node Reward Vulnerability Incident
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an urgent hard fork to fix a vulnerability that allowed some validator nodes to receive CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer obtain excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, ensuring the safety of ordinary users' assets.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be prematurely released, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already flowed out from the reward addresses. This incident only involved the early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion. This leftover supply is a medium- to long-term risk that requires ongoing attention.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardForkAztec recently made a big move by relaunching the privacy wallet zk.money that was discontinued three years ago.
First, let's explain what this wallet actually is.
zk.money is a self-custody private payment wallet. The mechanism works like this:
You create a name for yourself, for example bob.zk.money, and ENS points this name to a deposit address. Others can send you USDC, USDT, or DAI directly from exchanges or Ethereum wallets. Deposits and withdrawals are public on Ethereum, but what happens in between is not visible to outsiders. Names are first-come, first-served, and each deposit address can only be used once. This rule is specifically designed by the official team to prevent multiple deposits from being linked.
There are several hard constraints you must know:
Each deposit, payment, or withdrawal cannot exceed $2500. All users share a daily deposit limit of $50,000. Deposits incur a 35-cent fee, withdrawals a 20-cent fee, and each user is sponsored for 100 transactions per day. The wallet only holds DAI; if you send in USDC or USDT, it will automatically convert to DAI.
It is important to note that the old zk.money is not the same as this one. The old version was a private DeFi app on Aztec Connect, which stopped accepting deposits in 2023 and officially shut down in March 2024. The official statement is very clear: same name, but new product, new architecture, and accounts and funds are not migrated.
$AZTEC Core DAO Emergency Upgrade, Chip Risks Behind the Vulnerability
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an urgent hard fork to fix a vulnerability where some validator nodes obtained CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer receive excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, keeping ordinary users' assets safe.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be released early, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already distributed to reward addresses. This incident only involved early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion. This leftover chip risk is a medium- to long-term risk that requires ongoing attention.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardForkCore DAO Emergency Hard Fork Review: Node Reward Vulnerability Incident Overview
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an emergency hard fork to fix a vulnerability that allowed some validator nodes to receive CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer obtain excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, ensuring ordinary users' assets remain safe.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be released prematurely, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already distributed to reward addresses. This incident only involved early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardFork📉 $ETH 10.6 05:53 AM Technical 4-hour trend analysis is bearish (For reference only) (Conservative short positions can be taken near 2720).
Current price: 2715 (Ethereum)
This is a short-term strong resistance zone. The 4-hour short-term moving averages have formed a death cross, MACD red bars are narrowing, and momentum above the zero line is weakening. The price bounced to 2720 without volume breakout, indicating a "rebound to test resistance short" rather than a daily main bearish trend.
✅ Bearish logic (technical analysis)
• 4-hour: 2700–2720 has turned into a short-term strong resistance zone, price is pressured by the Bollinger middle band, highs are progressively lower (2788 → 2743 → 2724 → 2720), rebound lacks strength.
• Key resistance: 2730–2750 (bearish watershed). Breaking above 2750 indicates rebound escalation, invalidating short logic; above 2755 confirms failure.
• Key support: 2687 (weekly/platform support) → 2640–2655 (box lower edge/previous low zone) → 2615 (strong support).
• Structural judgment: 2720 is an "observation price + top test price," not a price to chase shorts. Ideal short positions wait for pressure at 2726/2730 or a break below 2700 with a failed pullback before following.
🎯 Trading strategy (execute directly)
• Direction: Short
• Entry: Short directly at current price 2720 (light position, 5x–8x leverage, single trade risk ≤1%–2%)
• Stop loss: 2755 (above 2750 previous high supply zone + bearish watershed, death cross short invalid)
• Take profit:
◦ TP1: 2687 (reduce position by 50%, take profit at platform support first)
◦ After TP1, move stop loss down to 2720 entry price → zero-risk short position
◦ TP2: 2645 (box lower edge/bull stop-loss pool, take profit on remaining position)
◦ If 4H closes below 2640, keep 20% to target 2615, but stop loss must be below 2687
📊 Simplified chart (at a glance)
Resistance: 2750 (bear forbidden zone) → 2730 → 2720 (current price)
Support: 2687 (first take profit) → 2645 (TP2) → 2615 (strong support)
Stop loss: 2755 (short position lifeline)
Conclusion: Short at 2720 = resistance zone top test/rebound short; reduce position if 4H closes above 2730, exit shorts if above 2750; bearish momentum valid until 2687 is broken, only consider extended decline if 2640 closes broken.OKB到底是什么？一篇讲清它的定位、机制与真实边界 OKB是OKX生态的官方功能型代币。它不是股票，不代表股权，也不承诺分红。它的价值逻辑，建立在三个正在变化的事实上：固定的2100万枚总供应量、X Layer的Gas消耗，以及纽交所母公司ICE入股OKX后带来的传统金融想象空间。 先说最核心的变化。2025年8月，OKX做了一次链上销毁，把历史回购和预留的65,256,712枚OKB一次性烧掉，总供应量永久锁定在2100万枚，并移除了合约中的增发功能。流通量直接砍掉超过50%。这意味着OKB的稀缺性不再是靠季度利润回购来维持，而是写进了智能合约里的硬上限。2100万枚的总量，比比特币的2100万枚还少。 但稀缺本身不创造需求。OKB从交易所平台币转向链上资产的关键一步，是它成为了X Layer的原生Gas代币。X Layer是OKX基于Polygon CDK构建的zkEVM Layer 2网络，定位为DeFi、支付和RWA发行平台。在X Layer上做任何交易，都需要消耗OKB作为Gas费。这是一种由真实网络使用驱动的通缩，链上活动越多，OKB的消耗就越多。 X Layer目前的数据💧 LIQUIDITY QUALITY TEST
$SKHYNIX: spread 0.007% | top-5 bid depth $104.2K
$SNDK: spread 0.006% | top-5 bid depth $28.0K
$KAITO: spread 0.029% | top-5 bid depth $14.5K
$SKHYNIX has the deepest visible bid support in this snapshot. Which coin would you trust in fast volatility?
$KAITO $SNDK $SKHYNIX
#TraderDesk #Crypto
⚠️ NFA — manage risk and DYOR.U.S. Treasury yields continue to suppress global risk appetite, so $SOL being pulled down in the short term is quite normal. Besant says this aligns with the global trend, but the market is not buying it; short-term sentiment remains tight.
However, I tend to think this is a linked shakeout, and the mid-term upward structure remains intact. Current price is around 119.15, down 1.9% in 24 hours, with high and low points at 122.25 / 119.1 almost touching the lower boundary. The trading volume is only 7.135 million, and the reduced volume indicates selling pressure is not out of control. Funding rate is -0.0006%, with shorts paying a small fee; open interest is 3.011 million, order book buy/sell ratio is 0.86, with selling pressure slightly dominant, but the 1-hour and 4-hour trends are still upward, and the pullback looks more like a consolidation.
Strategy:
- Long: place buy order at 118.85, stop loss at 117.65, target 121.95
- Short: lightly short on rebound resistance at 122.15, stop loss at 123.05, target 119.35
Keep position size within 20%, exit immediately if stop loss is hit, do not hold on.
SOL #CryptoMarket #ContractTrading #ShortTermTrading
The above is personal observation and does not constitute investment advice; contract trading with high leverage carries extremely high risk.
#OKXNOW直播：即将开启！
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
#霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 When $BICO rebounds, I pay more attention to whether leveraged positions cooperate, rather than directly treating the hype as buying pressure. CoinGecko shows that perpetual open interest is about $15.75 million, and circulating market cap is about $21.73 million; the former is already close to 70% of the latter. This ratio suggests: if volatility increases later, watch position changes closely. Price rising with decreasing positions may indicate short covering; price rising with increasing positions only means participation is up, not necessarily new longs entering.
For $BTC, I still expect a recovery but am not in a hurry to accelerate it. The current price is about $85,300, with a 24-hour increase of about 0.4%, overall mild. Gradual upward movement is not a problem; the key is whether volume can keep pace. If volume is insufficient, a slight increase in selling pressure may cause a pullback. Spot ETF inflows have returned, while ETH funds continue to flow out, indicating preference divergence but not enough to confirm trend acceleration.
For $HYPE, I want to verify the sustainability of fee buyback and burn. The aid foundation automatically converts transaction fees into HYPE and burns them, providing traceable buying demand but not a guarantee of price increase. Going forward, watch whether actual conversion amounts and burn volumes rise synchronously; if revenue growth cannot translate into stronger buying power, debates around 90 are of limited significance.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 $BTC $ Three ways the market values it
$BTC is valued through scarcity, liquidity, and its potential role as a crypto reserve asset. Institutional flows are important.
$ETH is valued through on-chain activity: stablecoins, decentralized finance, fees, and ecosystem market cap.
$SOL carries a growth narrative: users, transactions, applications, and liquidity must expand to support higher valuations.
Same market, but different frameworks. Price is the outcome; capital flows and real activity require confirmation 🚨 BTC is waiting for the Fed to make the next move.
BTC is stuck around $82.5K, with $83.2K as the key breakout level. Reclaim it with volume → $83.8K–$84.2K. Lose $82K → $81.6K could be tested.
ETH is holding stronger near $2.72K, while SOL is trapped around $140 with volume drying up.
No need to chase. Let the Fed Minutes drop, then let price confirm.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $ZEC
#FedMinutes
#DailyOrbit "Rotation takeover, BTC leads the charge first"
$BTC has reclaimed 86000 with increased volume, and the market clearly shows signs of revival. This is not a single-point surge but the initial signs of rotation.
Led by $BTC, ETH and ZEC follow closely, and previously silent sectors are gradually emerging. Capital is starting to look for the next breakthrough point, with mainstream, AI, DeFi, and privacy sectors taking turns to perform; no one wants to fall behind.
Still holding short positions on BTC, ETH, and ZEC. After reclaiming 86000, if volume continues to expand, the bears will suffer again. But one bullish candle does not tell the whole story; the key is whether volume can sustain and capital can spread.
Only with volume-price coordination and continued rotation can the market go far; otherwise, a rise followed by a fall is just another bull trap.
Personal opinion, not investment advice. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $VANA just gave its tokenomics a real usage layer.
With the Vega upgrade, apps now pay when they access user data. Protocol fees are split: 60% to stakers, 20% to VANA buybacks and burns, and 20% to ecosystem growth.
This directly connects token demand to network usage. The key metric now isn't hype or price - it's whether paid data reads keep growing.#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
The Federal Reserve's September meeting minutes will be released early Thursday this week. This is a key document to observe the real internal divisions on "whether to raise rates once more within the year."
In September, the rate hike of 25 basis points was unanimous, but the dot plot shows that eight officials expect at least two more hikes, six expect one, and four expect cuts, indicating significant divergence.
If the minutes show some officials were already opposed to continuing rate hikes, it will reinforce the current dovish pricing; if they emphasize stubborn inflation, it may push rate hike expectations higher again. Recently, several officials have hinted "no need to rush into action," Williams said there might be one more hike this year but no need to hurry, and Bowman leans toward no more hikes.
Since both nonfarm payrolls and PCE after September were weaker than expected, the market's pricing for an October rate hike has dropped to about one-quarter. Experts believe this minutes will not change the data-dependent tone but will reveal whether the committee's consensus on the tightening endpoint is solid.
For the crypto market, it directly affects the short-term trajectory of U.S. Treasury yields, which is currently the most critical suppressing factor for Bitcoin valuation.Good morning everyone, this is Baiye's little lecture,
Today we talk about $ETH
Currently, the daily chart shows signs of a bottom around 2700. The contract open interest has gradually increased from less than 800,000 contracts to 850,000, even close to breaking 880,000. According to previous logic, it should surge to 2780 and then pull back. The highest point reached now is 2777, not breaking 2780, maybe the market makers saw my post and didn’t follow the script, but the overall structure remains unchanged, still rising first then falling.
Suggested short at 2780,
Stop loss at 2820,
Take profit at 2650.
No suitable entry point for long currently, but from the pattern, it should rise first then fall!
⚠️The above is for reference only, investment carries risks#OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 I said $FIL is not good,
The positive news is truly positive, but the demand hasn't materialized.
Relying solely on supply contraction to tell a story, without real business support, no matter how strong the rebound is, it's just a market pulse, not a trend reversal. Let's see after a week, we'll wait and see 🔥 BTC, ETH, and SOL are all strengthening, but each is looking at completely different things right now.
Big brother BTC is around 86.1K, approaching the 87.1K–87.3K resistance zone. A breakout needs volume; only a strong volume-supported hold above this level truly opens up space.
ETH is around 2720, testing 2740–2770. If it can't hold above here soon, beware of a potential pullback after a spike.
SOL is around 121 and actually deserves a closer look. Support near 120 is still holding, with 122.5–123.5 as the key short-term resistance; a breakout could target 124–125. Meanwhile, SOL's recent open interest has dropped about 7%, with no obvious leverage buildup.
So now:
BTC looks at the trend, ETH looks for confirmation, SOL looks at resilience.
All three coins are rising, but the real question is—who can turn resistance into support.
Don't chase the first bullish candle; watch volume on breakouts and support on pullbacks.
The above is just personal market observation and does not constitute trading advice.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#OKXNOW直播：即将开启！ BTC, ETH, ZEC Capital Flow Analysis
BTC: Slight ETF Inflow, Institutional Holdings Unchanged
After the market shock triggered by the non-farm payroll data, BTC spot ETFs did not experience panic selling; instead, they maintained a slight net inflow. Institutional positions remain stable, serving as the key foundation for this rebound. However, caution is needed: the single-day inflow volume has significantly shrunk compared to previous peaks, large-scale continuous accumulation is absent, and capital sentiment is only in repair mode, far from returning to a frenzy.
ETH: Capital on the Sidelines, Weak Rebound
ETH ETFs have shown small net outflows over multiple days, with frequent in-and-out movements and fluctuating directions. Institutions lack sustained deployment willingness, showing strong hesitation. This directly causes ETH's rebound to consistently underperform BTC—without strong catalysts, it can only passively follow the rise, with capital flow clearly weak.
ZEC: No ETF Support, Pure Speculation
ZEC currently has no corresponding ETF product, so there is no institutional capital channel. The market is entirely driven by retail and contract funds, with upward moves relying on narratives and downward moves lacking support. Its volatility and drawdown exceed those of BTC and ETH. Without institutional backing, it is purely a chip game.
In Summary
$BTC has inflow support, $ETH capital hesitates, $ZEC runs naked in speculation. The current capital flow is a reparative inflow, not a trend entry—don’t mistake the rebound for a reversal. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 The $FIL market is overhyping the positive impact of the 10-15 unlock ending.
Supply improvement is a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one.
Without substantial growth in paid storage, simply speculating on the token model makes it difficult for the market to truly take off.
Let's wait and see.This round of divergence is very real and cannot be lumped together with the phrase "altcoin recovery."
$WLD: About +21% for the week, about +4% in 24 hours, showing strong short-term momentum. 0.60 is a psychological level; standing above it doesn't mean it will keep rising all the way. Watch the pullback after the breakout: a quick drop back will weaken the chasing buyers; a shallow pullback followed by a rise is considered valid. It's okay to be bullish, but don't be aggressive with your position.
$AAVE: Nearly 25% weekly gain, about 38% monthly gain, very strong this week. It didn't continue to surge today; with the weekend and previous gains combined, a pause is normal. What you really need to guard against is whether the next correction will wipe out multiple days of gains. Slowing down and stalling means the subsequent trend needs to prove itself.
$DOGE: Almost no movement for the week, slightly down in 24 hours, temporarily falling behind. Holders tend to get anxious and want to switch when they see others rising. But impulsive switching might just happen right before rotation. First admit its weakness, then wait for a signal of strength; whether to hold or switch, there must be a reason.
Overall, the rhythms differ; don't mistake divergence for a general rise. Don't neglect position management. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 $ETH back to $2700, the real signal is not the price
ETH returning to around $2700 looks like a rebound on the surface. But what’s more worth watching is its strength relative to Bitcoin.
If it’s just a rise measured in USD, it might only be a market sentiment recovery, driven by $BTC with ETH following. But when ETH starts outperforming BTC, the story changes: the market’s internal risk appetite is shifting.
This means funds may not be leaving the crypto market but could be reallocating—from BTC to ETH, then spreading to other assets. BTC has acted more like a safe haven recently, drawing most attention; once ETH/BTC strengthens, it indicates some funds are willing to take on higher volatility to seek catch-up gains and rotation opportunities.
So, $2700 is just the result; the ETH to BTC exchange rate is the clue. Next, watch two points: first, whether ETH/BTC can sustain strength rather than just a single-day spike; second, whether other major coins follow, creating a sector effect. If both happen simultaneously, the probability of funds spilling out from BTC will significantly increase.
In short: ETH’s rise is worth watching, but ETH outperforming BTC is what deserves a revaluation. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 $BTC Chip and Liquidation Perspective: Two Critical Levels at 80k and 88k
80,000 is the historical chip accumulation base for spot, where a large amount of relief selling pressure and long liquidation concentrate; 88,000 is the upper short stop-loss liquidation cluster, serving as a short squeeze target.
Two possible scenarios:
① Rise first then fall: Using short liquidation pulses to surge and test 88,000, completing the short squeeze payoff. However, the 80k-82k spot chips have not fully rotated, so after the surge, there is a high probability of a pullback to test the 80,000 support. Just because it surges up doesn’t mean it can hold.
② Fall first then rise: Upward attack lacks strength, actively retesting 80,000, clearing out high-position leveraged longs, and after sufficient chip exchange, challenging 88,000 again.
My personal judgment is that the market structure leans more toward the "rise first then fall" scenario.
Forcing the undecided to exit is the most common operation.