Orbit Post Sitemap
87000 is not the target; it's where others place their orders
$BTC is currently stuck below 87000.
$ETH is fluctuating around 2700, and $ZEC is holding at 1300.
What does this price level mean:
87000 is not a randomly drawn line.
The order density is highest at the round number threshold; every surge is pushed back immediately.
Who is placing orders here:
Sell orders were placed early, waiting for the buying volume chasing in.
Before a breakout, repeated attempts are normal.
Looking further down, a breakout requires more than just sentiment.
It needs real volume and actual money to push it up.
Without volume, multiple surges are futile.
Wait for a volume spike closing above 87000 before discussing direction.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
#VanEck：比特币或继续扩大市场份额 #Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 $BTC $ETH #Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元，真正火起来的可能不只是SOL.
An important data point has emerged: In September, the trading volume of tokenized stocks on the Solana chain reached $4.4 billion, setting a new monthly record. Platforms like Raydium and Orca have become the main trading venues.
What does this mean?
In the past, when people mentioned Solana, they mostly thought of MEME, DeFi, and high-frequency on-chain trading.
But now, more and more traditional stocks are being moved onto the chain.
Stocks can be traded 24/7, and settlement can also be completed directly on-chain. Recently, U.S. regulators have provided clearer policy space for tokenized stock trading.
So the significance of this $4.4 billion is not just a new trading volume high.
It’s more like a signal:
Solana is moving from being a "crypto asset trading chain" toward becoming an "infrastructure for traditional asset tokenization."
If RWA continues to expand, what’s truly worth watching for SOL is not just the coin price, but how much real assets and real transactions the chain can actually support.
What the market needs to verify next might be:
Is $4.4 billion just a temporary hype, or the starting point for Solana’s next growth phase?
#Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元 $SOL If BAL can enable nodes to prefetch state, its greatest value might be in reducing tail latency.
When discussing block-level access lists, people often focus on average execution speed, but what nodes really fear are the few extremely slow blocks. Irregular database access, cache misses, or contracts touching a large amount of scattered state can all prolong validation time. BAL exposes the accounts and storage keys a block will access in advance to the execution client, allowing nodes to prefetch data before actual execution, reducing the waiting time caused by searching around the disk temporarily.
This does not mean every block will speed up by the same margin. When the state is already in memory, the benefit of prefetching may be minimal; when the list is larger or network transmission is slower, it may even add extra overhead. What really matters to measure is tail latency: under high load, weaker hardware, and different database configurations, whether the slowest batch of blocks can more easily complete validation within the time limit. A nice average but frequent timeouts on extreme samples will still cause the network to favor high-end nodes.
For the long-term value of $ETH, a stable validation window is more important than advertised peak performance. As long as home nodes can continue to independently verify blocks after throughput increases, scaling does not sacrifice the breadth of validators. BAL is not a new feature users can directly click on, but it may determine whether higher capacity is ultimately validated by more people together or barely sustained by a few infrastructure providers.🔷 5 reasons for the $BTC rally and 5 against
FOR growth:
Probability of Fed rate hike <20%
ETFs attracted $2.4B in 5 days
Crypto market is small, inflows have strong impact
Open interest -20%, fewer liquidations
October historically: +17-20%
AGAINST growth:
Bonds >5%, rate is high
Brent $105, fueling inflation
Supply zone $83-86K
Classic cycle: ATH was in October 2025
ETF demand is unstable, volumes are low
🧠 Main question: have ETFs broken the old cycle model?
❓ Have ETFs broken the cycle model?👇I was really stunned for a few seconds when I just saw Kalshi's new round of financing valuation.
$40 billion.
Last December, its valuation was only $11 billion, it rose to $22 billion in March this year, and now the latest round is talking about $40 billion, almost doubling again in about half a year. Even more outrageous, Polymarket on the other side is also raising funds at a valuation of about $21 billion.
I used to think prediction markets were still a rather niche play in the crypto world, where people bet on elections, interest rates, sports games — fun but still far from a real big business.
But now the data is a bit different.
By August this year, Kalshi's cumulative trading volume has exceeded $40 billion, expanding nearly 4 times in half a year; Bloomberg disclosed materials showing its annualized revenue run rate was already close to $4 billion, with a gross margin of about 90%.
What's more interesting is that it is no longer satisfied with just competing with Polymarket on "who predicts more accurately," but wants to move toward a bigger exchange direction, even traditional exchanges like CME and ICE are being used as benchmarks.
I finally somewhat understand why Hyperliquid has recently started doing Outcome Market as well.
This track is no longer just "crypto people casually betting a few rounds." At this point, the account has directly dropped to 10.11U, and today I lost 12% in one go; my mindset has been completely worn down by ETH.
$ETH's trend is really frustrating. While BTC keeps surging repeatedly, it’s stuck oscillating between 2680 and 2740, totally out of sync. Several times it tried to break up, touching 2749 before being slammed back down. The bulls have no strength, the bears can’t push it down deeply, so it just stubbornly moves sideways, draining patience.
All the market funds are piling into BTC; Ethereum isn’t getting any incremental capital support, so it can only passively fluctuate following BTC. The Fed meeting minutes are about to be released, and everyone is watching cautiously; no one wants to take the initiative to push the market now.
The bulls are hoping for a breakout above 2750 to open up upward space, while the bears are waiting for a drop below 2680 to start a pullback. Both sides are just enduring. This kind of choppy market is the most torturous, sweeping stop losses back and forth. No matter long or short, holding for a bit too long means getting hit.
Only after losing did I realize: when BTC is strong, don’t stubbornly fight the number two. Until rotation happens, no matter how much you hold on, it’s hard to see a big move.
Follow your big bro here, those who understand will understand.
#ETHSidewaysChurnsPatience
#FundsPileIntoBTCEthereumLags
#WaitingForFedMinutesToBreakRangeIn the past couple of days, I saw the NEAR Intents situation, and my first reaction was: Isn't this storyline a bit too crypto-world?
Just a moment ago, everyone was praising it.
During the Bitget hack fund flow, the $NEAR Intents related system was discussed because it intercepted abnormal funds. But just a few days later, on October 1st, it had its own security incident, with preliminary losses of about 3.8 million USD.
The problem was in the interaction between Omni's deposit and withdrawal infrastructure and the NEAR Intents smart contract, not the NEAR mainnet itself being breached. After the incident, services were directly suspended, and deposits and withdrawals on 11 chains including BSC, Polygon, and Optimism were affected for a time. The team also promised full compensation for user losses.
The most dramatic part came afterward.
On-chain tracking showed the hacker transferred some funds to KuCoin, then converted them to $BTC; Aurora co-founder Alex Shevchenko then publicly called out, saying the attacker’s identity was confirmed and gave 48 hours to return the money.
Then the even more unbelievable happened: by October 2nd, CoinDesk updated that the attacker had returned all the stolen assets.
So now when I read on-chain security news, my mindset has changed.
Before, seeing “hacker stole 3.8 million”:
It’s over, another one lost.
Now:
Hold on, wait two days to see if it turns into “Bro, your money’s back, don’t report it”😭MetaMask took an action these past couple of days, and when I first saw it, I thought the data was wrong.
Nearly 17,000 $ETH $ETH validators suddenly started exiting.
On-chain statistics show that about 16,965 validators have exited or are in the queue to exit.
Seeing such a large exit volume normally, the first reaction would definitely be:
Who’s selling? 😭
But MetaMask came out to explain.
On September 30, they discovered a security incident in some of their infrastructure, so they proactively initiated validator exits as a precautionary measure. So far, no direct threat to the MetaMask wallet itself has been found.
I find this quite interesting.
Previously, when I saw ETH validator exit queues, I usually thought about the market: whether stakers were preparing to cash out, or if there would be a new wave of potential sell pressure.
But this time, so many exited at once, and the reason behind it was security risk control.
It also reminded me of something:
In the future, when we see sudden changes in staking data, we really can’t just look at "how much ETH is about to come out."
We also need to see who is exiting and why.
Because 17,000 validators represent a considerable scale, but "proactively withdrawing nodes to avoid risk" and "validators preparing to sell coins" are completely different things.
Currently, MetaMask has not found any direct risk to wallets, so I won’t interpret this as a huge ETH sell-off signal for now.
I’m more inclined to wait for them to fully review the September 30 incident.
After all, for MetaMask to withdraw nearly 17,000 validators at once...
This scale of "just a precaution" is indeed quite large 😭
For personal organization only, not investment advice, DYOR.CORE Hard Fork: Review of the Node Reward Vulnerability Incident
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an urgent hard fork to fix a vulnerability that allowed some validator nodes to receive CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer obtain excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, ensuring the safety of ordinary users' assets.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be prematurely released, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already flowed out from the reward addresses. This incident only involved the early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion. This leftover supply is a medium- to long-term risk that requires ongoing attention.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardForkAztec recently made a big move by relaunching the privacy wallet zk.money that was discontinued three years ago.
First, let's explain what this wallet actually is.
zk.money is a self-custody private payment wallet. The mechanism works like this:
You create a name for yourself, for example bob.zk.money, and ENS points this name to a deposit address. Others can send you USDC, USDT, or DAI directly from exchanges or Ethereum wallets. Deposits and withdrawals are public on Ethereum, but what happens in between is not visible to outsiders. Names are first-come, first-served, and each deposit address can only be used once. This rule is specifically designed by the official team to prevent multiple deposits from being linked.
There are several hard constraints you must know:
Each deposit, payment, or withdrawal cannot exceed $2500. All users share a daily deposit limit of $50,000. Deposits incur a 35-cent fee, withdrawals a 20-cent fee, and each user is sponsored for 100 transactions per day. The wallet only holds DAI; if you send in USDC or USDT, it will automatically convert to DAI.
It is important to note that the old zk.money is not the same as this one. The old version was a private DeFi app on Aztec Connect, which stopped accepting deposits in 2023 and officially shut down in March 2024. The official statement is very clear: same name, but new product, new architecture, and accounts and funds are not migrated.
$AZTEC Core DAO Emergency Upgrade, Chip Risks Behind the Vulnerability
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an urgent hard fork to fix a vulnerability where some validator nodes obtained CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer receive excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, keeping ordinary users' assets safe.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be released early, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already distributed to reward addresses. This incident only involved early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion. This leftover chip risk is a medium- to long-term risk that requires ongoing attention.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardForkCore DAO Emergency Hard Fork Review: Node Reward Vulnerability Incident Overview
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an emergency hard fork to fix a vulnerability that allowed some validator nodes to receive CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer obtain excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, ensuring ordinary users' assets remain safe.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be released prematurely, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already distributed to reward addresses. This incident only involved early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardFork📉 $ETH 10.6 05:53 AM Technical 4-hour trend analysis is bearish (For reference only) (Conservative short positions can be taken near 2720).
Current price: 2715 (Ethereum)
This is a short-term strong resistance zone. The 4-hour short-term moving averages have formed a death cross, MACD red bars are narrowing, and momentum above the zero line is weakening. The price bounced to 2720 without volume breakout, indicating a "rebound to test resistance short" rather than a daily main bearish trend.
✅ Bearish logic (technical analysis)
• 4-hour: 2700–2720 has turned into a short-term strong resistance zone, price is pressured by the Bollinger middle band, highs are progressively lower (2788 → 2743 → 2724 → 2720), rebound lacks strength.
• Key resistance: 2730–2750 (bearish watershed). Breaking above 2750 indicates rebound escalation, invalidating short logic; above 2755 confirms failure.
• Key support: 2687 (weekly/platform support) → 2640–2655 (box lower edge/previous low zone) → 2615 (strong support).
• Structural judgment: 2720 is an "observation price + top test price," not a price to chase shorts. Ideal short positions wait for pressure at 2726/2730 or a break below 2700 with a failed pullback before following.
🎯 Trading strategy (execute directly)
• Direction: Short
• Entry: Short directly at current price 2720 (light position, 5x–8x leverage, single trade risk ≤1%–2%)
• Stop loss: 2755 (above 2750 previous high supply zone + bearish watershed, death cross short invalid)
• Take profit:
◦ TP1: 2687 (reduce position by 50%, take profit at platform support first)
◦ After TP1, move stop loss down to 2720 entry price → zero-risk short position
◦ TP2: 2645 (box lower edge/bull stop-loss pool, take profit on remaining position)
◦ If 4H closes below 2640, keep 20% to target 2615, but stop loss must be below 2687
📊 Simplified chart (at a glance)
Resistance: 2750 (bear forbidden zone) → 2730 → 2720 (current price)
Support: 2687 (first take profit) → 2645 (TP2) → 2615 (strong support)
Stop loss: 2755 (short position lifeline)
Conclusion: Short at 2720 = resistance zone top test/rebound short; reduce position if 4H closes above 2730, exit shorts if above 2750; bearish momentum valid until 2687 is broken, only consider extended decline if 2640 closes broken.What exactly is OKB? A clear explanation of its positioning, mechanism, and true boundaries OKB is the official functional token of the OKX ecosystem. It is not a stock, does not represent equity, and does not promise dividends. Its value logic is based on three changing facts: a fixed total supply of 21 million tokens, X Layer's gas consumption, and the traditional financial imagination created by ICE, the parent company of the NYSE Stock Exchange, investing in OKX. Let's start with the core change. In August 2025, OKX conducted an on-chain burn, burning all of the historical buyback and reserved 65,256,712 OKB tokens at once, permanently locking the total supply at 21 million and removing the bonus issuance function from the contract. The circulating supply was cut by more than 50%. This means OKB's scarcity is no longer maintained by quarterly profit buybacks but is written into a hard cap in smart contracts. The total supply of 21 million coins is less than Bitcoin's 21 million. But scarcity itself does not create demand. The key step for OKB to shift from exchange platform token to on-chain asset is that it has become the native gas token of X Layer. X Layer is a zkEVM Layer 2 network built by OKX based on Polygon CDK, positioned as a platform for DeFi, payments, and RWA issuance. Any transaction on X Layer requires consuming OKB as a gas fee. This is a deflation driven by real network usage; the more on-chain activity, the more OKB is consumed. Current data on X Layer💧 LIQUIDITY QUALITY TEST
$SKHYNIX: spread 0.007% | top-5 bid depth $104.2K
$SNDK: spread 0.006% | top-5 bid depth $28.0K
$KAITO: spread 0.029% | top-5 bid depth $14.5K
$SKHYNIX has the deepest visible bid support in this snapshot. Which coin would you trust in fast volatility?
$KAITO $SNDK $SKHYNIX
#TraderDesk #Crypto
⚠️ NFA — manage risk and DYOR.U.S. Treasury yields continue to suppress global risk appetite, so $SOL being pulled down in the short term is quite normal. Besant says this aligns with the global trend, but the market is not buying it; short-term sentiment remains tight.
However, I tend to think this is a linked shakeout, and the mid-term upward structure remains intact. Current price is around 119.15, down 1.9% in 24 hours, with high and low points at 122.25 / 119.1 almost touching the lower boundary. The trading volume is only 7.135 million, and the reduced volume indicates selling pressure is not out of control. Funding rate is -0.0006%, with shorts paying a small fee; open interest is 3.011 million, order book buy/sell ratio is 0.86, with selling pressure slightly dominant, but the 1-hour and 4-hour trends are still upward, and the pullback looks more like a consolidation.
Strategy:
- Long: place buy order at 118.85, stop loss at 117.65, target 121.95
- Short: lightly short on rebound resistance at 122.15, stop loss at 123.05, target 119.35
Keep position size within 20%, exit immediately if stop loss is hit, do not hold on.
SOL #CryptoMarket #ContractTrading #ShortTermTrading
The above is personal observation and does not constitute investment advice; contract trading with high leverage carries extremely high risk.
#OKXNOW直播：即将开启！
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
#霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 When $BICO rebounds, I pay more attention to whether leveraged positions cooperate, rather than directly treating the hype as buying pressure. CoinGecko shows that perpetual open interest is about $15.75 million, and circulating market cap is about $21.73 million; the former is already close to 70% of the latter. This ratio suggests: if volatility increases later, watch position changes closely. Price rising with decreasing positions may indicate short covering; price rising with increasing positions only means participation is up, not necessarily new longs entering.
For $BTC, I still expect a recovery but am not in a hurry to accelerate it. The current price is about $85,300, with a 24-hour increase of about 0.4%, overall mild. Gradual upward movement is not a problem; the key is whether volume can keep pace. If volume is insufficient, a slight increase in selling pressure may cause a pullback. Spot ETF inflows have returned, while ETH funds continue to flow out, indicating preference divergence but not enough to confirm trend acceleration.
For $HYPE, I want to verify the sustainability of fee buyback and burn. The aid foundation automatically converts transaction fees into HYPE and burns them, providing traceable buying demand but not a guarantee of price increase. Going forward, watch whether actual conversion amounts and burn volumes rise synchronously; if revenue growth cannot translate into stronger buying power, debates around 90 are of limited significance.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 $BTC $ Three ways the market values it
$BTC is valued through scarcity, liquidity, and its potential role as a crypto reserve asset. Institutional flows are important.
$ETH is valued through on-chain activity: stablecoins, decentralized finance, fees, and ecosystem market cap.
$SOL carries a growth narrative: users, transactions, applications, and liquidity must expand to support higher valuations.
Same market, but different frameworks. Price is the outcome; capital flows and real activity require confirmation 🚨 BTC is waiting for the Fed to make the next move.
BTC is stuck around $82.5K, with $83.2K as the key breakout level. Reclaim it with volume → $83.8K–$84.2K. Lose $82K → $81.6K could be tested.
ETH is holding stronger near $2.72K, while SOL is trapped around $140 with volume drying up.
No need to chase. Let the Fed Minutes drop, then let price confirm.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $ZEC
#FedMinutes
#DailyOrbit "Rotation takeover, BTC leads the charge first"
$BTC has reclaimed 86000 with increased volume, and the market clearly shows signs of revival. This is not a single-point surge but the initial signs of rotation.
Led by $BTC, ETH and ZEC follow closely, and previously silent sectors are gradually emerging. Capital is starting to look for the next breakthrough point, with mainstream, AI, DeFi, and privacy sectors taking turns to perform; no one wants to fall behind.
Still holding short positions on BTC, ETH, and ZEC. After reclaiming 86000, if volume continues to expand, the bears will suffer again. But one bullish candle does not tell the whole story; the key is whether volume can sustain and capital can spread.
Only with volume-price coordination and continued rotation can the market go far; otherwise, a rise followed by a fall is just another bull trap.
Personal opinion, not investment advice. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $VANA just gave its tokenomics a real usage layer.
With the Vega upgrade, apps now pay when they access user data. Protocol fees are split: 60% to stakers, 20% to VANA buybacks and burns, and 20% to ecosystem growth.
This directly connects token demand to network usage. The key metric now isn't hype or price - it's whether paid data reads keep growing.#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
The Federal Reserve's September meeting minutes will be released early Thursday this week. This is a key document to observe the real internal divisions on "whether to raise rates once more within the year."
In September, the rate hike of 25 basis points was unanimous, but the dot plot shows that eight officials expect at least two more hikes, six expect one, and four expect cuts, indicating significant divergence.
If the minutes show some officials were already opposed to continuing rate hikes, it will reinforce the current dovish pricing; if they emphasize stubborn inflation, it may push rate hike expectations higher again. Recently, several officials have hinted "no need to rush into action," Williams said there might be one more hike this year but no need to hurry, and Bowman leans toward no more hikes.
Since both nonfarm payrolls and PCE after September were weaker than expected, the market's pricing for an October rate hike has dropped to about one-quarter. Experts believe this minutes will not change the data-dependent tone but will reveal whether the committee's consensus on the tightening endpoint is solid.
For the crypto market, it directly affects the short-term trajectory of U.S. Treasury yields, which is currently the most critical suppressing factor for Bitcoin valuation.Good morning everyone, this is Baiye's little lecture,
Today we talk about $ETH
Currently, the daily chart shows signs of a bottom around 2700. The contract open interest has gradually increased from less than 800,000 contracts to 850,000, even close to breaking 880,000. According to previous logic, it should surge to 2780 and then pull back. The highest point reached now is 2777, not breaking 2780, maybe the market makers saw my post and didn’t follow the script, but the overall structure remains unchanged, still rising first then falling.
Suggested short at 2780,
Stop loss at 2820,
Take profit at 2650.
No suitable entry point for long currently, but from the pattern, it should rise first then fall!
⚠️The above is for reference only, investment carries risks#OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 I said $FIL is not good,
The positive news is truly positive, but the demand hasn't materialized.
Relying solely on supply contraction to tell a story, without real business support, no matter how strong the rebound is, it's just a market pulse, not a trend reversal. Let's see after a week, we'll wait and see 🔥 BTC, ETH, and SOL are all strengthening, but each is looking at completely different things right now.
Big brother BTC is around 86.1K, approaching the 87.1K–87.3K resistance zone. A breakout needs volume; only a strong volume-supported hold above this level truly opens up space.
ETH is around 2720, testing 2740–2770. If it can't hold above here soon, beware of a potential pullback after a spike.
SOL is around 121 and actually deserves a closer look. Support near 120 is still holding, with 122.5–123.5 as the key short-term resistance; a breakout could target 124–125. Meanwhile, SOL's recent open interest has dropped about 7%, with no obvious leverage buildup.
So now:
BTC looks at the trend, ETH looks for confirmation, SOL looks at resilience.
All three coins are rising, but the real question is—who can turn resistance into support.
Don't chase the first bullish candle; watch volume on breakouts and support on pullbacks.
The above is just personal market observation and does not constitute trading advice.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#OKXNOW直播：即将开启！ BTC, ETH, ZEC Capital Flow Analysis
BTC: Slight ETF Inflow, Institutional Holdings Unchanged
After the market shock triggered by the non-farm payroll data, BTC spot ETFs did not experience panic selling; instead, they maintained a slight net inflow. Institutional positions remain stable, serving as the key foundation for this rebound. However, caution is needed: the single-day inflow volume has significantly shrunk compared to previous peaks, large-scale continuous accumulation is absent, and capital sentiment is only in repair mode, far from returning to a frenzy.
ETH: Capital on the Sidelines, Weak Rebound
ETH ETFs have shown small net outflows over multiple days, with frequent in-and-out movements and fluctuating directions. Institutions lack sustained deployment willingness, showing strong hesitation. This directly causes ETH's rebound to consistently underperform BTC—without strong catalysts, it can only passively follow the rise, with capital flow clearly weak.
ZEC: No ETF Support, Pure Speculation
ZEC currently has no corresponding ETF product, so there is no institutional capital channel. The market is entirely driven by retail and contract funds, with upward moves relying on narratives and downward moves lacking support. Its volatility and drawdown exceed those of BTC and ETH. Without institutional backing, it is purely a chip game.
In Summary
$BTC has inflow support, $ETH capital hesitates, $ZEC runs naked in speculation. The current capital flow is a reparative inflow, not a trend entry—don’t mistake the rebound for a reversal. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 The $FIL market is overhyping the positive impact of the 10-15 unlock ending.
Supply improvement is a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one.
Without substantial growth in paid storage, simply speculating on the token model makes it difficult for the market to truly take off.
Let's wait and see.This round of divergence is very real and cannot be lumped together with the phrase "altcoin recovery."
$WLD: About +21% for the week, about +4% in 24 hours, showing strong short-term momentum. 0.60 is a psychological level; standing above it doesn't mean it will keep rising all the way. Watch the pullback after the breakout: a quick drop back will weaken the chasing buyers; a shallow pullback followed by a rise is considered valid. It's okay to be bullish, but don't be aggressive with your position.
$AAVE: Nearly 25% weekly gain, about 38% monthly gain, very strong this week. It didn't continue to surge today; with the weekend and previous gains combined, a pause is normal. What you really need to guard against is whether the next correction will wipe out multiple days of gains. Slowing down and stalling means the subsequent trend needs to prove itself.
$DOGE: Almost no movement for the week, slightly down in 24 hours, temporarily falling behind. Holders tend to get anxious and want to switch when they see others rising. But impulsive switching might just happen right before rotation. First admit its weakness, then wait for a signal of strength; whether to hold or switch, there must be a reason.
Overall, the rhythms differ; don't mistake divergence for a general rise. Don't neglect position management. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 $ETH back to $2700, the real signal is not the price
ETH returning to around $2700 looks like a rebound on the surface. But what’s more worth watching is its strength relative to Bitcoin.
If it’s just a rise measured in USD, it might only be a market sentiment recovery, driven by $BTC with ETH following. But when ETH starts outperforming BTC, the story changes: the market’s internal risk appetite is shifting.
This means funds may not be leaving the crypto market but could be reallocating—from BTC to ETH, then spreading to other assets. BTC has acted more like a safe haven recently, drawing most attention; once ETH/BTC strengthens, it indicates some funds are willing to take on higher volatility to seek catch-up gains and rotation opportunities.
So, $2700 is just the result; the ETH to BTC exchange rate is the clue. Next, watch two points: first, whether ETH/BTC can sustain strength rather than just a single-day spike; second, whether other major coins follow, creating a sector effect. If both happen simultaneously, the probability of funds spilling out from BTC will significantly increase.
In short: ETH’s rise is worth watching, but ETH outperforming BTC is what deserves a revaluation. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 $BTC Chip and Liquidation Perspective: Two Critical Levels at 80k and 88k
80,000 is the historical chip accumulation base for spot, where a large amount of relief selling pressure and long liquidation concentrate; 88,000 is the upper short stop-loss liquidation cluster, serving as a short squeeze target.
Two possible scenarios:
① Rise first then fall: Using short liquidation pulses to surge and test 88,000, completing the short squeeze payoff. However, the 80k-82k spot chips have not fully rotated, so after the surge, there is a high probability of a pullback to test the 80,000 support. Just because it surges up doesn’t mean it can hold.
② Fall first then rise: Upward attack lacks strength, actively retesting 80,000, clearing out high-position leveraged longs, and after sufficient chip exchange, challenging 88,000 again.
My personal judgment is that the market structure leans more toward the "rise first then fall" scenario.
Forcing the undecided to exit is the most common operation.In a fragmented world, sanctioned interfaces are also the ones that charge fees. Sanction risk and pricing power grow from the same point. The market's current pricing for docks is far below the actual tolls they collect, so your investment target should not be the concept of "asset globalization," but rather the scarce links that are unavoidable in the globalization process.Big Brother Maji clears out PUMP: 146 million left with only three cards
Big Brother Maji slashed PUMP in one move, leaving only BTC, ETH, and HYPE in the $146 million portfolio. He earned 1.34 million in 5 days with 10 consecutive wins on PUMP, but left after profiting: meme coins are highly volatile with strong narratives, not suitable for core holdings; funds need to be shifted to mainstream assets.
$BTC is the ballast stone: 378 coins, average price 84,700, unrealized profit 152,900, liquidation price 65,200. Non-farm payrolls only 29,000, October rate hike bets dropped from 70% to 34.9%, BTC once surged to 87,000; but ETF inflows slowed, 3 billion over 9 days interrupted, single-day outflow 148 million, BlackRock IBIT still added 196 million.
$ETH is the most worrisome: 36,000 coins, average price 2,688, unrealized profit 610,000, but burning 1.23 million in funding fees daily. Positive funding fees and falling price indicate crowded longs unable to push price up; ETFs continuously outflowing, institutions remain cold. Citi's 3,028 target is too far.
$HYPE small position for flexibility: 174,000 coins, average price 89.72, slight profit 65,200, liquidation price 45. Regulatory concerns suppress price, but platform fees increased by 7.5%, Grayscale buying in, smart money accumulating at low prices.
Waiting for the Federal Reserve meeting on October 28 for direction. Slightly bullish but slow, having ammo is more reassuring than being fully invested. #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 CORE burn accelerating! Deflation is quietly gaining momentum
🔥 $CORE supply reduction is accelerating.
From Q1 to Q3 2026, over 72,700 CORE have been permanently burned:
• Q1: 15,516 CORE
• Q2: 27,264 CORE
• Q3: 29,933 CORE
In Q4, 5,883+ CORE are pending burn, and the amount continues to grow.
The key mechanism is simple:
Staking → Activity → Fees → Burn → Supply reduction
Don’t just focus on price and hype. The real signal is whether network activity continuously generates fees and permanently reduces CORE supply.📊🔥CORE
#CORE #BTCFi #DeflationNarrativeBTC is stubbornly holding the support level, which is mentally exhausting to watch, so I just closed the main chart monitoring page. Recently, the interesting part of the market is the resilience of the public chain sector. Look at the trends of SUI and NEAR; whenever the overall market wobbles a bit, they dare to rally in the opposite direction. This counter-trend strength logic is the survival strategy in a stagnant market environment. My account hasn't moved for now; I'm watching the volume reactions of these coins. As long as there is a volume breakout beyond previous resistance, this position can be considered for entry. Don't keep focusing on those that show no signs of improvement; pay more attention to where the capital flows—that's where the opportunities are.
$BNB $CAKE $TWT Preparing for thoracotomy. The 10-year US Treasury yield surged to 5.34%, the highest since 2002—this is not just high blood pressure, it’s an aortic dissection, with the tear located on the ascending aortic wall of the global bond market. Bessent said this is just a global resonance, not a unique US lesion, so it "does not yet constitute a major concern." As a surgeon, I understand the weight of this statement: he acknowledges the bleeding exists, but judges it is still within a controllable collateral circulation.
But vital signs never lie. Weak nonfarm payroll data, yields only briefly dipped before bouncing back to highs—this is called "ineffective volume resuscitation" in hemodynamics. The normal compensatory mechanism should be: weak economic data → rising rate cut expectations → long-term yields falling. Now this reflex arc is broken. This indicates the problem is not on the demand side, but on the supply and credit side: the market is not pricing growth, but pricing fiscal deficits, term premiums, and inflation stickiness. The 30-year yield hitting a 20-plus-year high means the heart’s afterload is continuously rising, and the left ventricle is quietly hypertrophying.
He specifically mentioned "no obvious fund flow from US Treasuries to German or Japanese bonds." This is a key interpretation. If blood only flows to other vessels, that’s shunting, and the body can survive; if blood starts leaking from the entire circulatory system, that’s disseminated intravascular coagulation, and no organ can remain unaffected. Currently, it looks like the former, but the waveform on the monitor is not smooth.
Linked to the US stock token $xQQQ, this "pump" is directly connected to the ascending aorta of long-term yields. The longer the duration of an asset, the more sensitive it is to discount rates—tech growth stocks are the apex myocardium, consuming the most oxygen with the least collateral circulation; once perfusion pressure fluctuates, ischemic changes appear first. When yields rise rapidly, the valuation expansion channel immediately narrows; this is not an emotional issue, but mathematically a decrease in stroke volume.
My current intraoperative judgment: the real lesion is not how high the yield itself is, but its "speed" and "structure" of ascent. Slow rise is compensation; rapid rise is decompensation. When long-term yields refuse to fall despite weak employment data, it means the market’s trust in fiscal credit and inflation path is decoupling—this is an intraoperative sudden arrhythmia that requires immediate differentiation between ventricular fibrillation or sinus tachycardia.
Postoperative monitoring points are clear: closely watch term premiums and subscription multiples of long-term auctions; these are the echocardiograms observing the heart’s pumping reserve. If the next round of long-term supply is weakly absorbed, yields violently spike again while stocks fall simultaneously, that is an early sign of cardiac tamponade—blood pressure drops, jugular vein distension, distant heart sounds; once these three signs appear together, the rescue window is extremely short.
As for $xQQQ, it is waiting for a signal: will long-term yields peak and fall or suffer a second tear? If yields stabilize, myocardial reperfusion occurs and the growth stock valuation channel reopens; if yields continue to hit new highs, it’s a sustained low perfusion state, and even the best underlying myocardium will gradually necrose. #bessenttreasuryyieldsThe most dangerous moment on the chessboard is never when the opponent sacrifices the queen for a fierce attack, but when you realize the opponent is simultaneously mobilizing forces on both flanks—consolidating the center on one side while quietly withdrawing defensive pieces from the flank. Before September 30, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot funds advanced in unison, launching nine consecutive attacks with about $3.1 billion in capital pouring in, like a complete chain of pieces pressing over the center line. Then, on September 30, the offensive stalled. At this point, divergence appeared: Bitcoin made moves again on October 1 and 2, with inflows of approximately $103 million and $31.7 million respectively, effectively repositioning the rook back to the open file to continue the pressure. Meanwhile, Ethereum experienced net outflows for four consecutive days starting September 29, with a single-day outflow of about $17.3 million on October 2 and a cumulative outflow of roughly $135 million—this is not a simple piece exchange, but a systematic withdrawal of flank forces.
As someone who has sat before the chessboard for thirty years, I tell you: such divergence is never noise, but an indication of the opponent’s strategic intent for the next phase. When two highly correlated assets begin to diverge directionally, it means capital is making structural choices rather than betting on direction. Bitcoin is once again treated as the central piece, serving as the anchor; Ethereum temporarily retreats to the sidelines, becoming a sacrificial piece. Sacrificing a piece is not necessarily bad, provided there is compensation afterward—but if there is no compensation for four consecutive days, it means the position is truly being thinned out.
A true grandmaster does not panic because the opponent makes a strange move, nor does he gloat over winning a pawn. The focus is on piece structure, timing differences, and control of key squares. The current situation is a classic "asymmetric double flank": one flank is reinforcing defense, the other is reducing it, while the central channel remains unopened. Whoever manages to reinforce the lagging flank first in the midgame will gain the initiative in the endgame. As for the line linked to the US stock market—that is not a piece on the board, but a timer outside the board, determining how many moves you have left to think.
Now, don’t ask who is strong or weak. Ask instead: when your opponent is placing pieces on both flanks simultaneously, do you still have pieces on your king’s side to defend? #btcethetfflowsdiverge The new week starts off well, but the pace is diverging.
$ONDO is reported around 0.4965, almost unchanged in 24 hours, but up about 35% in the past month. No rise today doesn't mean it hasn't performed before. Those with floating profits can wait; new entrants shouldn't rush to accelerate. 0.50 is the observation point this week; holding above it is more important than just touching it; if there's no improvement, don't force a catch-up rally.
$TIA is below 0.49, about 98% down from its historical high, with a rebound of about 9% in the past week. Cheap doesn't mean a return to promises. Having sold at over twenty before doesn't mean it will return to over twenty. Using old highs to calculate space makes it harder to let go. First, see how far the rebound can go; don't rush to pre-spend on break-even or doubling.
$ETH is around 2730, up about 1.2% in 24 hours, not very strong. I want to see if it can hold when it falls back. Slow gains are fine, but if a drop wipes all gains, patience will wear thin. Whether it can make people willing to hold a few more days this week is more important than a sudden spike.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 Sustained strength during recovery is more important than single-day gains.
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 The moment sixty-three prefabricated piles were simultaneously driven into a century-old foundation, what I cared about was never how dazzling the upper glass curtain wall was, but whether anyone was guarding the settlement monitoring points at midnight.
The white paper is the blueprint; what’s always sold is the facade imagination. What truly determines how long a building can stand are the pile foundation, load-bearing walls, and node welds. The permit submitted now is essentially an application for temporary structural support for an entire standardized new floor—five years, conditional, and removable at any time. Temporary support is called a measure project on the drawings; it does not enter the permanent structural calculation model, and the scaffolding must be dismantled once wind load exceeds limits.
The sixty-three items are sixty-three prefabricated floor slabs of the same specification. The value of prefabrication is not in aesthetics but in replicability, batch hoisting, and compressing the construction period from three years to eight months—this is the first time modular construction is allowed directly beside a main road. But please flip the section drawing to the bottom floor: where is the settlement clearing, where is the custody, where is the transfer registration? These three are shear walls, seismic rating, and the source of the entire building’s stiffness. If they still rest on the old system’s raft foundation, then no matter how transparent this blockchain layer is, it’s just a decorative curtain wall hanging outside the structure. Curtain walls are non-load-bearing; once displacement is large, joints crack first.
I care more about the expansion joints. Two systems joined must have deformation joints, settlement joints, and seismic joints. The settlement rates, elastic moduli, and thermal expansion coefficients differ between traditional ledgers and on-chain ledgers. Who designs this joint? How wide should it be? What sealing material to use? Without answers to these parameters, it’s equivalent to forcibly rigidly connecting two different geological layers, causing stress concentration inevitably at stiffness transition points—that is, the segment with the most active transactions and densest loads.
As for that linked item, I see it as the lobby’s atrium. When traffic flows upward unidirectionally, the atrium looks grand; once people flow out in the opposite direction, what determines life or death is only the evacuation width, not the atrium height. The width exists, but only just enough.
I don’t look at renderings. I look at geological survey reports, structural calculation books, the contractor’s historical performance records, and every signature from the supervisor. Long-term scalability is never about "can another floor be added," but how much redundancy remains in the foundation’s ultimate bearing capacity. What this building is doing now is anchoring an entire new steel structure floor into a set of old brick-mixed walls: if anchor bolts are properly installed, it’s a textbook case of reinforcement and renovation; if not, it’s a structural error in the load transfer path.
My judgment is simple: this is a beautiful building permit, not a qualified structural acceptance report. #okxicetokenizedstocks$ETH — 2,745.68 for a second week — a gap of just 0.33%. Glamsterdam hits the Sepolia testnet tomorrow (Oct 6), the final rehearsal before mainnet. Market cap near $330–332 billion.
#FedSeptemberMinutes
#NvidiaRecordHigh A quiet market might first disappoint those who are waiting, meow 😿😿
$BICO didn't move in the expected direction this time. The latest price is around 0.02112, already close to the 24-hour low of 0.02108, with the previous narrow range starting to extend downward. I will withdraw the expectation of a "quick catch-up". Being a bit cheaper is not evidence that buyers are willing to bid. Especially don't keep averaging down just to lower your cost. The cost number looks better, but the position may bear greater volatility. What is needed now is an effective rebound after the bottom holds; just a long sideways period can't support a bullish case.
$NEAR is back above 5, having risen about 110% in the past month, but only less than 1% in the past week. This is where expectation mismatches easily occur: seeing the monthly gain, one might think it is still rising rapidly; in reality, recent momentum has slowed. My judgment is that the previous performance is worthy of recognition, but the next phase needs new buying. Just passing the integer level is not enough to declare acceleration.
$TAO is around 299, having fallen about 2.5% in the past week. The number 300 is eye-catching, but between 299 and 301, there is no wall that can decide the trend. I care more about whether the rebound has sustainability. Being pessimistic just because it fell below the integer, or excited just because it crossed back over, can easily be swayed by a few trades. Tonight, I will control my position and extend the judgment period a bit.Crypto Watch: Rebound Settles, Breakthrough Yet to Come
Employment data is soft, risk appetite briefly warms up, Bounce is back again. But the market looks more like a recovery rather than a breakthrough.
BTC oscillates between 85.4K–86.4K. After data release, it marked above 87K but fell back over the weekend, with 85.2K back in sight. The weekly high remains 87.4K, no firm hold above. If it breaks below 82.8K, next focus is 80K.
ETH follows the broader market, hovering between 2,705–2,728. 2.60K is support, 2.77K still resistance. No independent strength, rhythm follows BTC.
SOL around 121. 117 supported the whole week, 125 is a local high, 123 is the first target. Structure is relatively stable but also needs breakthrough confirmation.
Overall, there is a rebound but no breakthrough. Before key levels are broken, the market is still probing within the range. This is only a market record and does not constitute advice.Nightclub hostess's diary of trading crypto after quitting
The popularity is still on the charts, but the price quietly turned down, with three popular coins collectively turning green.
$WLD's market is the most contradictory. 24-hour trading volume is $140 million, community discussion remains high, but the trend is a rise followed by a fall. It rose 3.8% the previous day, then fell 2.67% today. Funds enter quickly, but subsequent buyers willing to chase the highs can't keep up.
$FIL also played out a rise and fall scenario. It rose 2.89% yesterday and pulled back 2.12% today, with a 24-hour trading volume of $26.88 million. Compared to previous hype, market attention has clearly cooled, and the market lacks momentum to continue pushing upward.
$TRUMP is the weakest performer, down 4.13% the previous day and down another 1.30% today, with a 24-hour trading volume of $41.14 million. Market discussion heat continues to decline; bears are not aggressively dumping, and bulls lack strength to counterattack.
The commonality among these three coins is not how much they have fallen, but that their volatility is contracting. Previously, the market had big swings; now it is stuck grinding back and forth in a narrow range. Short-term funds no longer actively chase but have turned to a wait-and-see stance. Trading volume remains, but prices lack strength to rise. Popularity and market trends show obvious divergence. The excitement will gradually fade, and narrow-range oscillation will most likely become the main theme going forward. BTC breaks the deadlock, ETH follows with weaker gains
Bitcoin finally broke a one-week deadlock today. The current price is about 86700, up 2.3% in 24 hours, rising from 84700 to 86700 during the session, forming a strong bullish candle with over 2000 points, reaching a high of 87000. The previously repeatedly suppressed 85000 level was broken upwards, and short-term sentiment clearly warmed.
The driving force comes from weaker US labor data, easing market concerns about a Fed rate hike in October, leading to a collective rebound in risk assets, with BTC as the main beneficiary. Technically, 85000 has shifted from resistance to support on pullbacks, with attention on the dense previous highs between 87000 and 87400. It has risen 2.9% over the past 7 days, choosing to move up after weekend consolidation.
ETH followed with moderate gains, currently at 2728, up 1.4% in 24 hours, noticeably weaker than BTC. Although it has reclaimed 2700, it has not yet opened up space; the ETH/BTC ratio remains weak, indicating funds favor Bitcoin more, with Ethereum passively moving up for now. Short-term support is seen at 2680–2700, resistance first at 2750, then 2800. Its 30-day gain is about 10%, with a decent mid-term structure, but short-term elasticity is less than BTC.
Overall, BTC is responsible for breaking the deadlock, ETH for following. If BTC holds 85000, risk appetite may continue to recover; if it fails, a pullback to confirm is possible.$FIL's notorious reputation in the community is not without reason: early mining harvesting, unlocking sell pressure, fake computing power, countless people were deeply trapped.
The core logic behind this rise is simple: the team's unlocking has completely ended, token issuance cut by 75%, and supply has sharply contracted.
Note: supply contraction ≠ guaranteed sustained rise.
The biggest current issue: the actual paid storage revenue volume remains thin.
The positive is real, but it only improves the supply side.
Whether the gains can hold depends on two things:
① After Solstice is launched, whether on-chain paid storage can truly scale;
② Whether AI storage can bring real commercial orders.
Without real demand support, no matter how attractive the token model is, it’s just a hype story.
Be cautious of positive news being priced in when events unfold; data is the only true touchstone. #OKXNOW直播：即将开启！ $BTC $ETH Originally wanted to cut losses as a sacrifice, but the sacrifice didn't happen, and the meat cooked itself. When the screen was full of green light, $DOGE's rebound was weak, heavily suppressed from above, with strong selling pressure. I reminded DOGE not to rush to buy the dip; the short position structure is still intact.
When others were running away, what I saw was not panic but insufficient support. Every rebound was soft, volume didn't keep up, so I kept holding the short positions around 0.09612, waiting for it to go down on its own.
Now at 0.09560, the return rate is +27.56%, a big gain, worth the wait. Took profits on 80%, keeping 20% at cost price as protection, letting the remaining run with the downward move, and not letting profits become uncomfortable if it rebounds.
Don't let profits inflate, don't despair over pullbacks.
Don't lose patience in the consolidation and then try to regain dignity in a one-sided move.
For friends who haven't gotten in yet, listen to me: chasing highs easily leaves you stuck at the peak. Wait for a more comfortable position in the next round; I will notify you immediately.
$BNB $LAB $SPCX a rocket, rising 8% in one day, with a market cap of 2.2 trillion.
For the first time in human history, "going to space" has become a pay-per-use business. The only thing left is to cut the unit price down."The start is a bit warm, but don't rush to call a bull market"
At the start of the new week, risk appetite has warmed up slightly, but don't get carried away just because you see a red board. Rhythm, demand, and support are much more important than a momentary surge.
On the BTC side, I prefer to see a slow, steady rise with fluctuations rather than a sharp spike followed by a pullback. Once the rise stabilizes and is confirmed, the space will gradually open up, and confidence won't be repeatedly shaken. The return of ETF funds is a plus, but ETH is still flowing out, so the strength divergence hasn't disappeared.
ETH rose about 2.3% over the week, which is not strong. It needs to give holders a reason to keep waiting: not only must it resist declines, but it must also actively move upward, and corrections shouldn't wipe out all the gains. Only then can expectations be revised upward. It's worth watching now, but no need to rush to chase.
SOL has risen about 15% in the past month, and previous gains haven't been fully given back, so the structure isn't bad. If the market continues to warm up, it should perform more proactively; if it just follows the crowd, there's still a chance for an upward fluctuation.
The key for OKB is not the "21 million tokens" story, but whether there is real usage on the X Layer. No matter how scarce the token is, without on-chain demand, it can't sustain continuous imagination.
RE's circulating supply accounts for about 16% of the total. Don't just look at the market cap of circulating supply; there is still supply to be released later, so new demand must be there to absorb it. Short-term strength is acceptable, but don't ignore long-term pressure; control your position if participating.
In a word: the start is warm, but don't mistake the rebound for a reversal. Rhythm, demand, and support are what determine how far it can go. This is my personal observation and does not constitute investment advice.
$BTC $ETH $SNDK First, it relies on NAND price increases to survive, and the price hikes are due to shortages—shortages will eventually be filled by new production capacity;
Second, its competitors are Micron, Kioxia, and SK Hynix, all capable of expanding production, so the moat is "technology rhythm" not "monopoly";
Third, the 1716 price already factors in the good expectations for 2028.
So buying SanDisk is not buying AI, it's buying "how long supply-demand tightness can last."
And historically, no one has ever sustained it for three full years.Nightclub hostess's diary of trading crypto after going ashore
BTC is currently waiting for the Federal Reserve to release the next signal.
BTC is consolidating around 82500, with 83200 as the key breakout point. Once the volume picks up, the target above is 83800–84200. Conversely, if it falls below 82000, it will test the 81600 support.
ETH is relatively stronger, stuck around 2720. SOL is trapped around 140 dollars, fluctuating back and forth, with volume continuously shrinking.
Don't rush to chase the rise now; patiently wait for the Federal Reserve meeting minutes to be released, and wait for the market price to confirm the signal before acting. Many brothers ask me, since you already know it will rise, why not close the short positions first and then short again after it rises to a certain level?
I just want to say, trading requires fewer operations.
Currently, looking at the trend of $ZEC, it dropped from 1697 to 1270, now rebounding to 1368. The daily EMA20 is pressing around 1372, MACD green bars have shrunk but are still below zero.
In the short term, there are indeed signs of stabilization, and it might even bounce a bit more, but I still do not plan to close my short positions.
Has the long-term bearish logic changed?
No.
Macro pressure remains, insider selling continues, and the expectation of oversupply persists.
None of these can be resolved by a single rebound bullish candle.
So I don’t move, not because I’m stubborn, but because I know which part of the profit I’m making.
The current trading advice is: when ZEC rebounds to around 1380 to 1400, you can try shorting.
Or try going long near 1330, with a target around 1380.
Short term looks like a pullback, long term still bearish.
Patience is more important than action; the market never disappoints those who can hold on.
$BTC
$ETH
#This week the Fed will release the September meeting minutes
#BTC spot ETF inflows return, ETH funds continue to outflow