Orbit Post Sitemap
If you really want to make money in this market, the earlier you develop these 10 habits, the better.
If you want to treat trading as a long-term endeavor, don't expect to build your account with just a few heavy positions. Those who truly survive in the market rely on a set of rules they have repeatedly tested themselves. The following 10 points are what I've been using over the years.
1. Don't rush to bottom-fish after a strong coin has fallen to a certain stage; after 9 consecutive days of decline, you can start paying attention to rebound signals.
2. If the coin price rises continuously for 2 days in a short period, don't blindly chase; you can appropriately reduce your position.
3. If the daily increase exceeds 7%, focus on observing the high point action the next day; don't rush to chase.
4. The stronger the coin, the more you shouldn't rush in just because of a big rise; waiting for a pullback to stabilize is often more comfortable.
5. If there is little fluctuation for 3 consecutive days, just observe; if after another 3 days there is still no movement, consider switching targets. 卧槽，家人们！这次直接梭哈做空 $SAND！ 狗庄，你这是拉不动了吧？ 既然上不去，那就赶紧往下砸！ 空单已经上车！ 这次我的 $SAND 空单进场价大概在 0.0749，现在标记价格已经来到 0.0771附近。 浮亏已经650多U，收益率接近 -43%。 说实话，看到这个数字确实有点疼。 但现在我反而不想在这种位置乱砍。 为什么？ 因为今天最猛的时候，$SAND 也只是冲到 0.08035附近。 而前面 0.08299 已经出现过一次明显压力。 现在价格再次往上拱，看起来确实很强。 但把周期拉到4小时看就不一样了： 从0.04附近一路拉到现在，短时间基本已经接近翻倍。 这种行情真正危险的，从来不是上涨本身。 而是—— 涨到最后，上面没人愿意继续接盘。 现在 $SAND 在0.077附近。 MA5大约0.0755，MA10大约0.0749。 这说明什么？ 短线趋势确实还强。 这一点我不嘴硬，多头现在还远没有彻底结束。 所以我这次赌的也不是它马上归零。 我赌的是： 0.08附近这块压力，没有那么容易直接穿过去。 你有本事就继续拉。 先把0.0803站稳，再去挑战前面的0.08299。 真同一资产同时存在于多链,到底是增加流动性,还是切碎流动性? 1/ 一个容易被忽略的悖论:发行方把资产部署到越多链上,理论上触达的用户越多,但实际结果经常是相反的——流动性没有变大,反而被切成了一堆互不相通的小池子。 今天用$ONDO $LINK $UNI $HYPE 拆一次这个悖论:多链到底是放大器,还是粉碎机。 2/ 先说结论:答案取决于"怎么多链",而不是"多不多链" 行业研究明确指出,一只代币化国债基金如果持有人分散在五条网络上,结果往往是五个浅池子,而不是一个深池子——这会压低流动性、拉大价差、让价格发现变得不可靠。更现实的成本是:没有合适基础设施支撑的跨链转移,通常需要重新铸造加反复KYC,综合成本高达2%到5%,还要等好几天才能完成。 行业测算显示,这种跨链碎片化每年从代币化资产市场里白白蒸发掉约6亿到13亿美元的价值。 3/ 问题根源:大多数"多链部署"其实是"复制粘贴",不是"同一份资产" 传统做法是在每条链上单独铸造一份"打包/映射"版本的资产,结果是同一个底层资产变成了N个互不兑换的影子代币,每条链各自维护独立的流动性池、独立的供应量,甚至可能出现同一资产在不同Rocket launch! The veteran leader in the metaverse suddenly explodes
The long-dormant metaverse sector finally experienced a long-awaited breakout on the evening of October 4. As a veteran leader in this field, SAND showed an exceptionally strong short-term trend after a prolonged consolidation, like a rocket igniting and taking off, instantly igniting the market's bullish enthusiasm.
Looking back at the starting point of this rally, the precise opening average price of 0.07403 contrasts sharply with the current mark price of 0.07737, and the long positions at the bottom have already secured stable floating profits. This is not a blind speculation but a rational game based on profound fundamental changes.
Recently, South Korea's three major exchanges (including Upbit) have successively lifted trading warnings on SAND, a major positive development that directly cleared liquidity obstacles and paved the way for capital inflows. Meanwhile, the highly anticipated Studio engine is expected to officially launch this month, and this core product iteration will bring substantial strong catalysts to the platform ecosystem.
The current trading logic centers on betting on the dual resonance of "all negative news priced in" and "version updates." Although the violent surge on the hourly chart is exciting, investors should remain clear-headed amid the cheers: short-term profit-taking pressure may emerge at any time, and caution against a pullback after the rally is necessary to navigate volatility steadily and sustainably. #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 Leverage on Dogecoin: This time, U.S. regulators have firmly nailed the table legs first.
On October 2, Kalshi officially launched Dogecoin perpetual contracts regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and today it has reached its first weekend. The rules are not complicated: one contract corresponds to 10 DOGE, with a maximum long leverage of 3.8x, and early positions clearly skewed toward the sellers.
Previously, these kinds of products were mostly run in "back alleys"—dimly lit, narrow door cracks, where if you won money you had to first find the exit, and if you lost, you could only look for customer service in the chat box. Now it's different; it has been moved into a house with a street number, where you know exactly which door to knock on regarding margin collection, forced liquidation calculations, and disclosure postings.
This means Dogecoin trading is moving from the "dark alleys" into the "main hall." For aggressive traders used to battling on native crypto platforms, 3.8x leverage might seem somewhat "mild," but this is precisely the logic of traditional financial regulation: allowing innovation while first nailing the table legs to prevent it from being overturned.
This may signal that more mainstream cryptocurrencies will enter the traditional investor's view in the form of these "regulated leveraged products" in the future. With the table legs nailed firmly, those who come to the table will naturally feel more secure, but gamblers hoping to get rich overnight might find it not exciting enough. #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 $ZEC this weekend really disgusted me!
This time I got a harsh lesson from this speculative coin: never underestimate the destructive power of an oversold rebound.
I originally thought that after a sideways consolidation, $ZEC would continue to go down, but unexpectedly the bulls suddenly pushed against the trend, driving the price all the way up to around 1330.
The 50x high-leverage short position I opened around 830 is now in a very passive state. Two positions are floating losses close to 2000U, and the return rate has dropped to below -3000.
What’s most painful now is not the loss itself, but the choice ahead:
Cutting losses means accepting a significant loss; holding on to the position risks the price breaking through the resistance near 1346, further increasing losses.
Caught in a dilemma, this is the most tormenting part of high-leverage trading.
This time I’ve thoroughly understood: the market won’t necessarily fall just because you are bearish, nor will it continue to fall just because it has dropped enough.
It’s not scary to be wrong about the direction, but it’s scary to use high leverage and still refuse to admit mistakes and stop losses.
The market always has the next opportunity, but once your principal is severely damaged, even the best market conditions afterward won’t matter to you.
From now on, position management and risk control must come first. Less luck, more discipline, is the only way to go further in this market. Just sold and bought back again, what is this whale up to?
Someone sold ETH at 2709 and bought it back at 2695.
4 hours ago, an address withdrew 3,283.56 ETH from OKX, worth 8.85 million. The last time they deposited to the exchange was 1,099 ETH. That means not only did they buy back what they just sold, but they also bought an additional 2,184 ETH.
Back and forth, a price difference of 14 dollars. With 3,283 ETH, they made less than 46,000. After all the fuss, they only earned the transaction fee.
But the action itself is interesting.
Selling at 2709 and buying at 2695 shows they think below 2700 is a good entry point. Withdrawing the coins might mean they plan to hold long-term or stake them to earn interest. Either way, it's better than leaving them on the exchange.
Retail investors watch the candlesticks daily trying to catch big swings, while this person only profits 14 dollars difference but increases their coin holdings. This is the most basic coin accumulation logic—ignoring price, focusing on quantity.
The above is compiled from on-chain data, not investment advice $ETH $BTC From the perspective of altcoins and the entire crypto industry, "buybacks" have indeed become a key narrative in this cycle! Believe it or not! The fundamentals of altcoins will become increasingly important in the future!
Aave, which I tweeted about a while ago, has also risen quite a bit and has been consolidating recently without much decline. Aave has strong profit-making ability and has even announced expectations for buybacks. This move will definitely be launched later, but not now.
So I took a look at Morpho in the same sector. Both Aave and Morpho belong to the on-chain lending sector.
By comparison, the two have different models: Aave mainly uses a shared liquidity pool, while Morpho emphasizes customizable lending markets and vaults.
The core of a blockchain is a series of core links, such as a DEX (Uni), lending (Aave), perpetuals (Hype), and meme launchpads (Pump). Connecting these forms the core of a chain.
The core of this chain is its profit-making ability. Look at those mentioned above— which one isn’t profitable? Profitability is a crucial test for a coin.
Many projects now announce buybacks, imitating US stock buybacks. Later, there will be dividends, and this will gradually evolve, allowing them to capture considerable price gains. The market is currently very receptive to this approach!$NEAR current net value: 24,819.71 CNY.
Today's loss -40.89 CNY,
My leg is about to break from all the pain today, I'm 🌿ed!
In the morning, I had a floating loss on a pons order, then hedged it, but who knew that in the evening, a huge bearish candle smashed through my short stop loss!
Next time, remember, never randomly place orders when hedging!
I originally stuck to the short position, now I've actually made 1500 CNY profit, but because of lack of confidence, I ended up with a loss of -1540 CNY!
It hurts so much!
The market is chaotic, and people's minds are even more chaotic.
Now I only stick to three things:
Don't overleverage, don't delay stop losses, don't be greedy with profits.
Keep working slowly and patiently.
Wait for the market to give direction, and wait for myself to be more stable. Bitcoin and Ethereum have once again retreated back into the consolidation range.
$BTC｜around 84600
$ETH｜around 2678
The 15-minute timeframe shows volatility as narrow as a crack in the door, with a thin order book and depth not fully expanded; even small orders can easily create long wicks.
BTC capital inflow is starting to cool down, while ETH shows volume-price divergence, making the rebound seem weak.
Simply put, the volume isn't keeping up; an upward surge can easily turn into a paper tiger, while a downward drop might be more decisive.
$SOL remains the same, acting according to the big brother's mood.
When prices rise, you get a taste; when they fall, you often take the hit first. Today, even the volatility seems to be on leave, leaving only drowsiness after watching for a while.
In the current market, there's no need to frequently trade over a few candlesticks.
Being out of position is also a position; waiting is itself a form of trading.
Before the market gives a clear direction, preserving your principal is more important than anything else.
#BTC spot ETF inflows return, ETH capital continues to outflow
#Federal Reserve and European Central Bank to release September meeting minutes
#US-Iran tensions persist, G7 to release up to 100 million barrels of reservesW rose about 13%, currently trading near the 24-hour high, yet the perpetual funding rate remains negative.
As of 22:15 Beijing time, OKEx spot price is about $0.01533, with a 24-hour high of $0.015347 and a low of $0.013558, daily volatility around 13.2%; spot trading volume is about $1.72 million, approximately 2.3 times the recent median daily volume, with the best bid-ask spread around 0.15%.
OKEx data shows the nominal value of perpetual open interest is about $2.53 million, current funding rate about -0.011%, and perpetual contracts are trading at a discount of about 0.24% compared to spot. The price is near the high, but shorts are still paying funding, indicating the upward move hasn't fully squeezed out the counter-trend positions.
My judgment is that this strong move is more driven by spot trading combined with short pressure, rather than overheated long leverage. The most common misjudgment is to interpret a negative funding rate as an inevitable short squeeze; it could also come from hedging and does not alone prove further price increases.
Next, watch $0.015347 and $0.0145. If the previous high is broken and the funding rate remains negative with continued active trading, the squeeze conditions will persist; if it falls below $0.0145 and open interest remains high, the current judgment fails.
$W $ENA is close to resistance, what evidence is most lacking for a breakout
$ENA 24h +1.80%, current price 0.2375, only 1.77% away from the 1-hour resistance at 0.2417. This kind of position often creates an illusion: just crossing it intraday is mistaken for a completed breakout. The real weighty answer is whether it can hold after crossing.
Position is more honest than adjectives. The current price is about 2.06% away from the 1-hour support at 0.2326 and about 1.77% from resistance at 0.2417. Putting these two distances together reveals which side needs more evidence. Looking only at price changes easily mistakes the space already traveled as if it hasn't started yet.
Volume does not back the price movement: the current 1-hour trading volume is only 0.32 times the average of the previous 20 bars. Low volume can also move prices quickly, but sustainability must be proven by the next phase of the market. A single touch or a long candlestick is not enough to draw conclusions.
It’s easier to understand this phase as an equipment acceptance test: running without load is not completion; stability under boundary conditions gives weight to conclusions. Let the key levels give results first, then discussing direction is more honest. Do you think this touch will turn into a valid breakout, or will it still be pushed back into the range by resistance? The market is volatile; the above is only market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is Crypto Bull speaking.Brothers!! I really can't take it anymore! 340,000 U full position, going all-in, shorting $PUMP! Dog dealer, you've been pulling for so long, aren't you planning a pullback yet? The short position is already open, I'm just waiting for you to really drop in this wave! $PUMP It's now around 0.00628, the 24-hour high once surged to 0.006601, a single-day gain close to 9%. The earlier was even more exaggerated, rising from around 0.0037 all the way to now. Every time there was a slight pullback in between, someone immediately bought it back. Strong, indeed strong. I agree with that. But here's exactly the problem: you've been strong for too long. Nowadays, anyone in the market basically thinks a pullback is an opportunity and that they can keep pushing. And when everyone else thought this way, I actually became cautious. Because at times like this, what is most likely to happen? Everyone was waiting for the price to keep rising, but Dog Broker suddenly crashed, and those chasing the higher earlier ran off together. So this time, I didn't wait anymore. I went short! My entry point was around 0.0056785, and the current marker price is around 0.00628. My position was 340,000 USD, with an unrealized loss of over 30,000 USD, and the return was close to -100% at one point. Honestly, seeing this number would definitely be tough. But what I'm really focusing on now is no longer just the unrealized loss on paper. I'm focusing on the 0.0066 area. Today, the price reached a high of 0.006601, but after surging up, it didn't break through with increased volume; instead, it shrank back to around 0.0062. This is actually the caseAchieved on time within 24 hours. Starting today and tomorrow, it can fluctuate between 83100-83600.BTC is rising again. Last night's drop—was it just a fake-out?
It surged to around 85000 last night. I judged it wouldn't break through, so I added short positions near 85000. The lowest point only reached 84500 before pulling back, and now the price has climbed back above 85200. If it moves higher, the suspense will increase.
ETH is even stronger today, rebounding all the way from 2650 and directly topping above 2700, with almost no significant pullbacks in between. If 2700 holds steady, once the gold market opens tomorrow, combined with the sentiment, it could easily accelerate again.
The key now isn't guessing the direction but watching two levels: whether BTC can effectively hold above 85000; and whether ETH's 2700 is a breakout or a false breakout. If both are true breakouts, last week's upward trend might continue; if it rallies then falls back, it would be a rebound divergence high point within a downtrend.
Don't rush to go all-in with high leverage; wait for it to give a confirmation signal on its own. What do you think—will this wave continue upward, or is it a bull trap before a drop? Leave your direction in the comments.
#美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
#贝森特：美债收益率上升符合全球趋势 The strength of $LTC is undeniable, but mistaking overheating for safety is often when emotions are at their most expensive.
Break this market move down into a conditional test:
Directional evidence: Both the 1-hour and 4-hour charts are relatively strong, with RSI reaching 76 and 58 respectively. The strength hasn't disappeared, but sentiment is already crowded; at this point, the real focus isn't guessing the peak but seeing if the high-level support can quickly recover any pullback.
Position evidence: Current price is 71.89, about 4.40% away from the 1-hour support at 68.73, and about 0.57% from resistance at 72.3. The space isn't determined by sentiment; ultimately, it depends on which of these two boundaries is effectively broken first.
No more guessing for the next step. My observation line is clear: standing back above and holding 72.3 means regaining short-term initiative; breaking below 68.73 shifts focus to the 4-hour support at 65.63. If pressure continues above, the 4-hour resistance at 72.3 is temporarily just a distant reference, not a preset target.
I don’t only share when my calls are right. How the price chooses between 72.3 and 68.73 next will be publicly reviewed in the next round.
Do you see a high RSI as proof of strength or a risk warning?
The market is volatile; the above is only market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is Crypto Bull speaking.Are ETH bulls still hoping for a one-shot break above 3000?
First, let's pull up the daily chart and take a look. 3000 was the level before the mid-February halving. That wave dropped from 3400 to a low of 1700—how many bulls got trapped above that? Don't they have a clue?
The current sideways movement is no coincidence. When it rises, trapped positions get liquidated and it crashes; when it falls, high-leverage longs get liquidated, and shorts get shaken out by sudden spikes. The market makers want liquidity, not to help you get out of your losses. 3000 is not a resistance level; it's a concentration camp for trapped positions.
Moreover, a bull market in 2025 and then a continuous rally in 2026? Dropping down costs nothing, and pulling up costs nothing either? Expecting all trapped positions at 3000 to escape unscathed in just 8 months—is the market maker a philanthropist?
Currently, the average price is 2245. If ETH keeps rising, I'll keep adding short positions. Bulls who are optimistic, go long—don't just shout, show real trades and order records. Both bulls and bears have real money on the line; keyboard warriors have no seat at the table.
High leverage on both sides is easily crushed. The key is not stubbornly holding a direction, but who gets liquidated first. It's not that ETH can't rise now; it's that if it rises to around 2400–2600, the trapped and liquidated positions will teach you a lesson.
#美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
#贝森特：美债收益率上升符合全球趋势 Brothers, this rebound of BTC really feels a bit like the "last gasp of a strong bow." The 85600 level is like an iron gate; no matter how hard it tries, it just can't break through, indicating very heavy selling pressure above.
If you opened a short position early, don't be too upset. This kind of high-level stagnation often means the bullish momentum is fading. Even with such positive non-farm payroll data on Friday, the price couldn't rise, which itself is an extremely dangerous signal—good news fully priced in turns into bad news.
Now ETH funds are still continuously flowing out, and altcoins are even weaker in following the rise. As long as BTC can't firmly hold above 86000, market sentiment is very likely to be released collectively on Monday, leading to a smooth downward trend. Be patient and wait for the pullback; opportunities come from the drop, not from chasing the rise. #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 An address that has been dormant for 13 years woke up and transferred out $43.
$43. It holds 801 BTC, worth over $68 million. But it only transferred $43, as if testing whether the address is still usable.
This address accumulated 801 coins when BTC was priced between $124 and $411. The highest cost was $412, and now BTC is around $85,000, with an unrealized profit of $67.82 million. That's more than 200 times increase.
Someone who held for 13 years started testing the address today.
They wouldn't move without reason. Transferring out $43 means they are confirming the private key still works and the address can still send transactions. After testing, the next step will be serious action.
13 years ago, when BTC was still a geek's toy, they bought 801 coins. They went through the bull and bear cycles of 2013, 2017, 2021, and 2024. They never sold during each surge, nor fled during each crash. Now BTC is at $85,000, and they have awakened.
They are not here to add positions; they are here to collect money.
13 years, 200 times. How long have you held your longest coin? Let's discuss in the comments.
The above is based on on-chain data and does not constitute any trading advice.
$BTC $ETH $BTC derivatives open interest dropped sharply by 8.5% in one week to 355 billion dollars, trading volume collapsed 64% to 361.2 billion, and ETF net inflow was only 13.84 million dollars, not comparable to the 2.4 billion of the previous week.
Price rise is short covering, not incremental funds; retail investors are buying at 84,000, leverage is withdrawing; breaking through 87,000 requires real buying power.
10Y US Treasury yield at 5.34%, next week's FOMC minutes are the real test, rate cut expectations are only priced in at 40%.
Hold 81,000 to push to 87,000, reduce positions if it breaks 79,000. BTC's rise is empty; the candlestick went up but leverage fled, this kind of rebound is the most deceptive.BTC is oscillating at a high level; next week's minutes will be the real test
After BTC surged to 87,000, it faced pressure and is currently fluctuating between 84,000-85,000. The spot ETF maintains net inflows; earlier high-leverage longs were liquidated, but spot funds have not withdrawn, indicating there is still support at the bottom.
ETH is weak, with continuous capital outflows, hovering around 2,700, and obvious selling pressure above.
The real risk lies next week: on October 7, the Federal Reserve, and on October 8, the European Central Bank will successively release the September meeting minutes. The minutes record the hawkish stance before the rate hike; if they signal a hawkish bias, liquidity expectations may tighten again, suppressing risk assets.
The market seems to be supported by spot buying, but in reality, there is a hidden risk of deep pullbacks and spikes. Leverage positions are very prone to liquidation at this level, so it is essential to strictly control positions and respect market uncertainty.
#美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 $BTC long position floating loss shrinks to 13.9%, finally surfacing a bit from the deep water.
Opening average price $86,460, position unchanged. BTC currently at $85,308, nearly $480 higher than last time, loss continues to narrow but still some way from break-even.
According to current market conditions, 1-hour EMA20 is about $85,033, RSI about 66. The last three hourly candles all closed above $85,000, price continuously testing $85,300. If it closes above $85,430, next target is $85,700-$86,000.
Perpetual positions increased by about 0.5% compared to 23 hours ago, price and positions rising together, rebound involves new positions. Funding rate is positive, but longs are not crowded; if positions continue to increase while price stalls, watch for new longs to exit first.
Among OKX smart money, 20 are long and 13 are short, number skewed towards longs, but shorts account for 60.7% of the amount. Total positions increased by only about $60,000 compared to 24 hours ago, smart money has not significantly added. If price recovers above their average long cost of $85,688, short positions may face further pressure.
This week, US spot BTC ETF net inflow is $82.9 million, long-term holders’ MVRV remains above 1, spot fundamentals are solid.
I’m first watching if $85,430 can hold. If it holds, continue to wait for $86,000; if it falls below $85,000, recovery will slow, and if it breaks $84,700, beware of this momentum leaking away again. 今天总算能稍微松一口气了。 前几天被 $NEAR 的深水区折磨得够呛，今天随着大盘回暖，它总算从“ICU”里被抢救出来了。虽然账户目前依旧是“两赚一亏”，但整体心态明显舒服多了。 $BTC｜定海神针，稳如泰山 持仓均价：84044 最新价：85155 浮盈：659.09U 回报率：26.08% 大饼这波确实没让人失望，突破之后稳稳站上85000，利润已经一路逼近700U。现在防守线也同步上移到77815，继续拿着，暂时不折腾。 $SOL｜逐仓战神，全场MVP 持仓均价：117.41 最新价：121.42 浮盈：146.20U 回报率：66.05% 保证金率：12.44% 这笔逐仓单必须再夸一次。 当初行情方向不明的时候选择逐仓试水，没想到现在已经拿下66%的收益。事实证明，控制好仓位和风险，有时候比盲目梭哈更重要。 $NEAR｜艰难回血中 持仓均价：4.909 最新价：4.8561 浮亏：49.30U 回报率：-22.24% 从昨天一度浮亏-51%，到今天收窄到-22%，这波回血是真的惊心动魄。 目前强平价还在0.0306，整体账户风险依然可控。但现在距离回本已经没那么远了，反而开始让ZEC short whale traders are starting to make significant profits! The top three whales are all holding short positions, with holdings valued at about 100 million USD! They are all currently profitable, with the top-ranked whale having made about 7.53 million USD in profit. Long whale accounts are starting to see profit pullbacks but still show no signs of exiting. The fourth and fifth long positions have seen profit pullbacks of at least 50%, but they remain firmly bullish, with two liquidation ZEC position increased by 10.2%, price only rose by 1.49%, both buyers and sellers are pushing in. If $1,346 holds above, it could target $1,380; dropping below $1,317 may easily trigger buyers to reduce positions.
STRK position surged 58.2%, after touching $0.0567 then falling back. Early buyers have realized profits, the rally may face profit-taking; if it does not break $0.0525, strength remains.
Related data shows 836 coins rising, 339 coins falling, GameFi up 4.80%, risk sentiment is spreading. $BTC only increased by less than 1%, while $STRK surged 24%, currently favoring high-resilience tokens.
According to OKX data, $BTC is quoted at $85,262, $ZEC at $1,334.8, and $STRK at $0.0545. The overall market is slightly up, with STRK clearly leading.
BTC has risen above the 1-hour EMA20, with a bullish position of 0.7%, and the funding rate has turned negative. If $85,400 holds above for one hour, it may trigger a short position buyback; if not, watch $84,950 for now. At three in the morning, the myocardium under the shadowless lamp is still trembling, while in another operating room, a $3 billion private placement transfusion is being performed without anesthesia. A preoperative valuation of 140 billion, an extremely high-risk extracorporeal circulation for any surgery—but the problem is, the ejection fraction of this heart is indeed soaring: annualized revenue is approaching 70 billion, with growth exceeding 70% since the beginning of the third quarter, and enterprise-side income has directly doubled. The aortic flow is real.
But I do not praise any surgery.
First, look at the vital signs. This round of financing is classified as a “pre-IPO financing after a delayed listing,” translated into surgical terms: a scheduled surgery was forced to become an emergency bypass because the coronary conditions changed during the wait. No formal terms have been signed, meaning this body has not truly been put on extracorporeal circulation yet, heparin has not been administered, and intubation is still under discussion. More troublesome is the possible “government equity participation” statement—equivalent to the national medical team deciding who the recipient is during a heart transplant. Historically, cases handled this way do not have long-term survival rates determined by the surgeon.
High flow, high valuation, and sustainability—these three are never the same indicators on the operating table. What really needs to be seen is whether the stroke volume can be sustained and whether there are hidden distal coronary artery lesions. The steep slope of the annualized data itself is a precursor to arrhythmia—the faster the short-term acceleration, the narrower the ventricular fibrillation window during retraction. The doubling of enterprise income is myocardial hypertrophy, not myocardial strength.
Next, look at the linked peripheral targets. The collateral circulation of this body is priced as an independent heart, a typical reperfusion injury: once the main lesion deteriorates, the distal end will be impacted in reverse, with blood pressure rising first then collapsing. The financing is expansion, not hemostasis. All expectations before the IPO phase have been discounted into the current systolic pressure; any subsequent “no formal terms” turning into a “breakdown in talks” is an event on the level of an aortic dissection.
As the surgeon, I have only one judgment: this heart’s chest is not closed yet, and the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography conclusion is—the left ventricular wall motion is moving from diffuse weakening to segmental paradoxical motion. The effect of anesthesia is being overridden by the body’s own stress response. Everyone is watching the monitor; no one is listening to the new murmur in the stethoscope.
The real lesion is not in the financing scale number, but in the gap that has appeared between this body’s autonomy and vital signs. The sutures are still there, but the tension is uneven. #openai$1.4tfundingYour logic is reasonable, but 80,000 RIVER is already a very large position relative to the token’s liquidity, so I would treat this as a tactical trade rather than a conviction hold.
Current data shows RIVER around $1.22–$1.25, with roughly $23.9M market cap on DeFiLlama, while derivatives volume is much larger than spot and open interest is about $23.5M. That makes liquidation/short-squeeze dynamics particularly important.
#FedECBMeetingMinutes #BTCETHETFFlowsDiverge #BessentTreasuryYields $WLD No need to explain the market trend, it just moves, you just need to avoid making reckless moves.
While everyone is still watching, WLD pulled back and held steady, buying pressure strengthened. I suggest looking at long positions, don’t chase shorts. From 0.5481 to 0.5841, floating profit +327.49%. The earlier hesitation was real, but the move turned out to be very rewarding.
Take profit on 70% first, keep the remaining 30% at cost price for protection. Brothers, pay attention to profits; if it keeps going, let the profits run.
Have a strategy before the market opens, discipline during trading, and reflection after. The money you make is the realization of your understanding; the money you lose is the flaw in your understanding.
For those who haven’t gotten on board, listen to me: now is not the time to rush, wait for the new structure to emerge. There are still opportunities, don’t be anxious.
$LAB $DOGE $ENA
Ethena is pursuing a different stablecoin model through USDe, combining crypto collateral with market-based hedging rather than relying on traditional fiat reserves alone. That creates an innovative DeFi structure, but also introduces its own risk considerations. For ENA, sustainable growth ultimately depends on whether the ecosystem can maintain demand for its synthetic-dollar infrastructure beyond incentive-driven activity.$RE
RE is taking the RWA narrative into a less crowded area: reinsurance. Its protocol connects on-chain capital with real-world U.S. insurance underwriting and uses risk-tiered tokens within that structure. That is a genuinely different application of tokenization. The key challenge is execution—turning complex insurance risk into transparent, scalable on-chain markets without compromising risk management.On the chessboard, while the opponent is still focused on exchanging the central pawn structure, the true master has already set their sights on the promotion square on the eighth rank. Aave V4 made this move on September 25, allowing non-US users to borrow USDC using seven tokenized US stocks—Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla—as collateral, with an initial collateral cap of about $29 million. This is not a small-scale probe with a pawn on the flank; it is a classic flank breakthrough: tokenized stocks have evolved from mere trading pieces into compound forces that can be used as collateral and generate yield.
How did we view US stocks in the past? They were pieces on another chessboard—deep liquidity, stable rules—but separated from the on-chain world by a wall. Traders at most made some off-chain mirror bets, like threatening the opponent’s king’s wing with a bishop on a different color square—seemingly related but never truly reachable. Now, a breach has been made in that wall. Collateral is an identity; only things that can serve as collateral truly enter the bloodstream of the balance sheet. This move means tokenized equity is no longer just a tourist but an acknowledged garrison.
But pay attention to the opening details: the total $29 million limit is spread across seven stocks, so the collateral space for each is extremely limited. This is a tentative advance, not a full-scale attack. Aave’s governance is clearly budgeting risk, observing whether the liquidation curve will encounter slippage traps amid US stock volatility. US stocks have pre-market and after-hours trading, circuit breakers, dividends, and splits, while on-chain markets never close. Forcing two chessboards with different time dimensions to overlap, the biggest fear is the opponent making a move while you have your eyes closed.
The true strategic value of this move lies in containment. Once tokenized stocks are accepted as universal collateral, the demand for stablecoin lending will no longer be driven solely by crypto asset volatility but will be influenced by traditional equity holders’ willingness to hold. People holding Apple stock who don’t want to sell but want liquidity now have an on-chain channel. This is a brand-new synergy of forces: stocks provide collateral, stablecoins provide liquidity, and DeFi provides the liquidation engine.
The midgame has just begun. If collateral limits are gradually relaxed and liquidation mechanisms can absorb gap jumps, traditional equity could become a true heavy piece in the on-chain world. Conversely, any chain liquidation triggered by extreme market conditions would turn this move into a costly sacrifice.
Arbitrageurs have already sensed the endgame, while most retail investors are still stuck at reading headlines. The real killer move is never the first move of the opening. #tokenizedstocksonaave$SNDK market update for today
Looking at the 3-minute short-term chart, the Bollinger Bands are narrowing with the current price stuck around 1721, support at 1720.4, and resistance at 1733.
Currently holding a long position with an average entry price of 1733.3, temporarily at a floating loss.
Short-term moving averages are intertwined, the market is oscillating and pulling; for this small time frame, it’s all about mindset, no longer daring to heavily bet on direction 😩The IMF approved over 100 million dollars for El Salvador and even gave a special exemption — they openly hoard $BTC, and the International Monetary Fund tolerated it.
This was unthinkable three years ago. Back then, when El Salvador made $BTC legal tender, the whole world laughed at it. Now the review has passed, and the money keeps flowing.
My feeling in two words: a change of era. Before, it was like a wild kid secretly buying; now they’re buying with other people’s money and can even use the terms on the IOU to calculate.
Looking at the chain again, the spot ETF attracted over 6 billion dollars this quarter, the numbers are accumulating for you.
But don’t get too excited yet. $BTC is now hovering around 85,000, with volume shrinking as if it’s still waking up, only 600 million dollars traded in a day, much less than I expected. It already had a rally in the first half of the month, and now it’s stuck mid-level, neither up nor down. Anyone betting on data will get slapped; just wait for it to figure itself out. I’m neither adding nor reducing, just watching. $BTC $HYPE
Hyperliquid’s biggest strength is not simply being another Layer-1; it is the tight integration between its chain and an on-chain perpetuals market. That design gives HYPE a direct connection to trading activity and liquidity. The longer-term question is whether Hyperliquid can keep attracting traders while expanding beyond its flagship exchange into a broader financial ecosystem.$BNB 都快到800了，但$OKB 还在120上下横着，看到大家都在盯着发布会了。 这么一看，至少有个好处就是，$OKB 不会因为发布会不足预期就下跌，毕竟现在没炒起来，说明大家预期不高。 OKB好在盘口干净：120上下横了七天，MA7/MA14都在这里，下方117是过去一个月反复验证的地板，支撑力很强。 而且发布会越来越近，X-Perp货架已经铺了10多个新交易对。现在我反而是偏乐观，横得越久，发布会那天的爆发力越值得等。 X layer从去年的0到现在的10，生态越来越完善，跟BSC的差距也在越来越小。可以想象，现在不是X Layer的终点，它未来还有很大的空间。 希望这些空间都会反映在OKB以后的币价上 $AI
Gensyn approaches the AI narrative from the infrastructure side, aiming to create open markets for compute, data, and information exchange. That makes its thesis fundamentally different from AI tokens built mainly around applications or speculation. The important test is practical demand: can decentralized machine-intelligence infrastructure attract sustained usage from developers and AI workloads rather than remaining primarily a narrative-driven asset?I stared at this structural diagram for three minutes, not because the lines were complex, but because the load-bearing logic was so clean — the all-time high of $237.88 is like adding a shear wall on top of a foundation already pressed to its limit, and the entire building shows no settlement cracks.
A momentary market value of $5.7 trillion is not just a renovation rendering; that is the actual measured elevation after the main structure was topped out. What really unsettles peers is the additional $150 billion buyback authorization — in architecture, this is called "structural self-support," meaning the owner doesn’t need external capital injection and can reinvest cash flow back into the foundation slab. The remaining $235 billion, used through fiscal year 2028, is a construction schedule spanning three fiscal years, not a temporary scaffold to rush the project.
Morgan Stanley again gave a top pick rating, citing demand for AI infrastructure and customer base expansion. Translated into construction blueprint language: the building’s functional zoning is transforming from a single factory to an urban complex; the tenant structure is thickening, not relying on a temporary showroom floor to support height. Quarterly revenue of $96.2 billion, up 106% year-over-year, with next quarter guidance of $105.8 billion to $110.1 billion — this is continuous climbing formwork construction, where each floor is poured only after the concrete strength of the previous floor meets standards.
Now look at the linked asset XIWM. The relationship between tokenized US stocks and underlying assets is essentially a "structural transformation layer" issue. Tokens are not the original building; they are a retrofit and addition on top of the existing main structure: external market synchronization, liquidity channels, settlement time zones — all connectors and dampers. If the connectors lack stiffness, a nighttime fluctuation can crack the facade, even if the original building inside remains perfectly still.
When reviewing diagrams, I fear two types of people most: those who only draw facade effects, and those who only calculate reinforcement ratios. The former ignore the foundation; the latter ignore the skyline. The current situation is precisely both happening simultaneously — the underlying computing power demand is thickening the load-bearing system, while the token layer tries to match the stress distribution of this skyscraper with lightweight components. Lightweight components can make eaves, but cannot make the core tube.
What truly determines the long-term scalability of such assets is never the promotional blueprints, but three things: redundancy design of data mapping, wind load resistance of the clearing window, and whether there is a controllable load transfer path when a fault occurs. These three can be checked on the blueprints and can also be faked; the difference lies in whose lower structure remains in place when the first hurricane hits.
As for whether this asset can stand, it depends on whether its foundation is an independent pile foundation or relies entirely on the adjacent building’s soil bearing capacity as friction piles — if the latter, when that building sneezes, this leg’s problem won’t be cracking. #nvidiarecordhigh$RSR
Reserve Rights has an interesting stablecoin architecture, but there is an important distinction investors should not overlook: OKX states that Reserve’s mainnet version has not launched yet. That makes RSR particularly dependent on future protocol execution. The real fundamental milestone will be whether the planned stablecoin infrastructure develops into meaningful usage, liquidity, and sustainable economic activity.比特币目前仍处在关键选择区，短线重点关注 $82.5K–$83K。 🔹 多头 сценарий： 只要 BTC 守住 $82.5K 附近，并维持上升趋势线，同时放量突破 $85K–$85.5K，那么下一目标可以关注 $87.5K–$88.5K。 🔻 空头 сценарий： 如果 $82.5K 支撑失守，而且反弹无法重新站回该区域，市场可能进一步回踩 $80K，甚至测试 $78K–$79K。 近期 ETF 资金、美国利率预期以及宏观数据仍可能放大 BTC 的短线波动。现在更重要的不是猜方向，而是等待价格给出确认。 两种 сценарий，都先让市场说话。 不追涨，不提前抄底，等突破或失守后再行动。 📈📉 #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #BTCAnalysis #DailyOrbit$DYDX
The interesting part of dYdX is the relationship between its token and an actual trading-focused ecosystem. Perpetuals, margin products, liquidity pools, and trading incentives create several mechanisms that can generate activity. But derivatives markets are highly competitive. Sustained trader participation, deeper liquidity, and efficient execution will matter far more than short-lived speculation around the token itself.When mining is not profitable, miners haven't left yet, which explains the situation better than any positive news. Bitmain's mining machine calculator once provided a comparison: when DOGE was at $0.22, miners' annual revenue was about $22.7 million; when the price dropped to $0.093, the same computing power crossed the breakeven line, and the machines were running at a daily loss. Someone is still doing loss-making business for only one reason—the mined coins are not flowing into the market. TGood afternoon, brothers, I am Bai Qing, determined to become a genius teenager in the crypto circle!
Currently on the 39th day of compounding starting with 500U, total assets around 3000.
$ETH It's the weekend, no market activity as usual, no significant movement. Looking at the trading volume, it has dropped to 1.5 billion, the lowest I've seen in all this time playing. What is going on? Clearly abnormal, there must be a big change coming soon. I've basically maxed out my position, just waiting for the flowers to bloom! Whether it's a mule or a horse, we'll see in the next few days. Let's do this, brothers, good luck!Brothers, this recent market really makes me feel both love and hate. $BTC is grinding back and forth between 83,000 and 84,000, with daily volatility less than 1%, and volume has shrunk to the point where "there's no strength even to spike a needle." $ETH is even worse, stuck around 2,500, unable to rise or fall, with L2s absorbing most of the mainnet revenue. Meanwhile, US Treasury yields have surged to 5.31%, a level unseen since 2002. This kind of macro and on-chain tension happening simultaneously is exactly when the harshest shakeout occurs.
Let me start with the harshest truth: if you still come in hoping to "find a 100x coin to turn things around," this round of the market is a harvesting machine made just for you.
---
$BTC and $ETH are no longer the same thing
Many people still look at $BTC and $ETH as "big coin one and two" together, but institutions have long since placed separate bets. BlackRock's IBIT absorbed nearly $200 million in one day, directly pulling the $BTC spot ETF into a net inflow of over $100 million. But what about $ETH? It has seen net outflows for three consecutive days, with Fidelity and Grayscale products being redeemed the hardest, with single-day outflows exceeding $55 million.
In short, institutions are buying $BTC but not $ETH. This is not short-term noise; it is a structural change in capital preference. If you are heavily invested in $ETH hoping it will fly in sync with $BTC, you need to think clearly first: what narrative is supporting ETH now? If the issue of L2s siphoning mainnet revenue is not resolved, the divergence between its price action and $BTC will only become more obvious.
Citibank just raised $BTC's target price from 82,000 to 113,000 and $ETH's from 2,240 to 3,028. But notice, Citibank's premium for BTC is much greater than for $ETH, which truly reflects institutional sentiment.
The US Treasury yield knife hangs over everyone's head
Besent says "rising yields align with global trends," but in reality, the US Treasury is desperately buying back long-term bonds, using the entire $6 billion limit at once. Yet yields still rise.
The logic is simple: the higher the US Treasury yield, the less attractive non-yielding assets like $BTC become. With the 10-year Treasury offering over 5% risk-free returns, why would institutional funds stay in a crypto market with 30%+ volatility? When Besent hinted at expanding buybacks in August, $BTC did spike, with the 30-year yield briefly dropping from 5.29% to 5.20%, and $BTC breaking above 85,000 in response. But that was emotion-driven, not a trend reversal. As long as yields continue to rise, $BTC's leverage costs will keep increasing, and correction pressure remains.
So don't call a bull market just because of one green candle. Watch the US Treasury yields—they are more reliable than any candlestick pattern.
The bull market is still on, but don't expect 10x gains anymore
CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju recently spoke bluntly: this bull market's BTC gains are likely 3 to 5 times, not the parabolic 10x+ surge of the last cycle, and the following bear market will be much milder. His reasoning is solid—MVRV has never fallen below 1 this cycle, and even at lows, $BTC hasn't dropped below holders' average on-chain cost. The market is thickening, participant structure is maturing, and the space for wild swings is compressed.
But analyst alicharts paints a bigger technical picture: if $BTC breaks the previous high of 125,000, the upper boundary of the ascending channel points to 190,000; if $ETH breaks above 5,000 channel resistance, the target is 8,800. $SOL's cup-and-handle neckline is at 295, and a breakout points to above 2,700.
These two views are not contradictory, but you have to pick one to trust. My judgment is that Ki Young Ju's framework is closer to reality. Technical targets can be noted but shouldn't be the basis for positions. In an institution-led market, gains and losses are slow; holding $BTC for 3 to 5 times return already beats 95% of people.
What to watch in the Fed and ECB minutes
Next week, both central banks will release their September meeting minutes. The market is now focused on how many hawkish votes there really were in September, and how many reluctantly followed. Weak nonfarm data, sluggish wage growth, and PCE revisions showing inflation lower than previously estimated all point to one conclusion—the bar for another rate hike in October is very high.
If the minutes show a more divided hawkish stance than expected, that will be a short-term risk appetite release window. But don't treat it as a trend signal. The Fed is really waiting for hard evidence of price pressures returning. Until then, the market's patience game continues.
---
To summarize my current strategy:
Hold BTC as a base position, watch ETH without adding, and keep a small position in SOL to follow the ecosystem. Sector-wise, protocols generating real fee income (like decentralized derivatives platforms such as Hyperliquid) are much more reliable than pure narrative coins. RWA and AI proxy directions have fundamental support but require extremely selective picks.
The biggest position management discipline: always keep bullets in your chamber. If BTC pulls back to the 77,000–80,000 support zone due to October CPI or Fed meetings, that's when you should act. Chasing at around 84,000 now is poor value.
The bull market is still on, but the way to make money has changed. It used to be about who was braver; now it's about who lasts longer.
#BTC财库优先股融资升温 #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 The last trade I made was with $CHIP. Seeing an opportunity, I used 30% of my position to go long, and later I took profit and sold. I haven't watched the market for the past few hours; I'm a bit tired. Today, I was working while watching the market, and my mental energy is almost drained. The remaining opportunities are yours to take; I need to rest now. From about 11 PM last night, I recharged 1.48u to now 18u, a tenfold return in one day, which is good. It will only get harder from now on. Why? Large capital is also a problem because the fees take a big share. Personally, I prefer short-term compound operations, meaning buying low and selling high. Today's operations probably involved no less than twenty trades. Secondly, I maxed out leverage, which makes it easy to profit quickly but also easy to lose big quickly. Thirdly, if the capital keeps increasing, it becomes a live target in the market. For example, I started with ten dollars and made over four hundred dollars in three days, a 40x return. Later, overconfident, I went long on the then-new coin $UB, but in less than eight seconds, it was smashed with a super long bearish wick, causing a liquidation. The biggest lesson I learned is that the more capital you have, the less you should go all in. Alright, that's it. To summarize today's profit: Cost 1.48u, today 18u, return rate 1116%. Good night to all crypto friends, wishing you all daily success.Scrolling through the group chat, I saw someone posted a screenshot showing a $BTC long position, up 50%.
Entered at 84815, current price 85242, 100x leverage. The price only went up a few points, with an unrealized profit of over 6500 U. This guy held on steadily all the way up.
I glanced at the chart twice, about to feel sour, but then I noticed four small words in the corner — "simulated trading."
Wow, making 6500 U on a demo account and coming to the group to post a screenshot. My FOMO instantly calmed down, and I even felt like laughing.
Is there anyone in the comments who almost got fooled by a simulated account like me? Let's talk.😑#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 #SEC加密资产托管新规，拟放宽机构自托管限制 #波动雷达：币种异动观察 +464.65% looks like a war god, but a 50x pullback can wipe out most of it. $STRK perpetual 50x long (0.05305→0.05798).
Floating profit does not equal realized profit; small pullbacks at high leverage eat into gains. Entry price 0.05305 serves as the bottom reference, marked price 0.05798 tests the upper boundary.
Protecting profits is harder than opening a position. Strategy: keep holding above 0.056, defend if it falls below 0.054; only consider acceleration if volume supports a stable break above 0.058. Don’t count money early, only when closed. $BTC $ETH #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 $ETH current price is 2697.95, fluctuating back and forth on the hourly level. After surging to 2706.99, it failed to hold, closing with a small upper shadow, indicating repeated battles between bulls and bears here.
Short-term resistance is at 2710, with key support at 2674.
If 2674 holds, there is a chance to retest the previous high of 2707; once this level is effectively broken down, bullish momentum will weaken, leading to a further pullback near 2660 to seek support.
The overall market follows $BTC's movement, with Bitcoin oscillating around 85288 without a clear direction, making it difficult for Ethereum to develop an independent trend. On the macro level, the market is awaiting further statements from the Federal Reserve, causing funds to become cautious. Trading volume is insufficient, so rallies easily face selling pressure.
Currently holding 0.153 contracts with 50x leverage, entry at 2674.45, floating profit has reached 42.13%, and today's account profit is close to 28%. No plans to blindly add positions; will hold the existing base position, strictly guarding support levels, and avoid greed in betting on unlimited upside. In a high-level oscillating market, avoid chasing highs or selling lows; patiently wait for a directional choice.
Follow me to learn more about cryptocurrency trends.
$BTC $ETH
#BTC and gold 90-day correlation rises to +0.50
#Federal Reserve officials say rate hikes are needed, September probability rises to 58.6%
#ZEC rises to 10th in cryptocurrency market capitalizationTen years of experience in the crypto circle, from 500U to 30 million: survival rules for trading:
Ten years of trading crypto, enduring sleepless nights of anxiety and surviving the lows of significant account drawdowns. I've seen people achieve leaps through a single market cycle, and I've also witnessed too many lose years of accumulation due to impulsive trades. Only at the end do you realize that long-term success in trading never relies on secret tricks; it's all supported by those seemingly ordinary good habits.
✅ Eight core trading habits:
No trades without signals: Market fluctuations happen daily, but certain opportunities are rare. If the pattern isn't clear or the logic isn't confirmed, never trade just for the sake of trading. Most losses come from meaningless frequent operations.
Don't be swayed by emotions: Daytime is full of flying news and constant community calls, making it easy to be swept into impulsive decisions. The market is clearer late at night; away from group noise, your judgment becomes calm and objective.
Regularly lock in floating profits: Floating profits in your account are always just paper gains and can retract anytime before you withdraw. After each profit, transfer out a portion to gradually turn market numbers into real money that belongs to you.
Tools matter in quality, not quantity: Use MACD to see trends, RSI to gauge strength, and Bollinger Bands to observe price volatility. Mastering these three basic tools is far more effective than piling up a dozen conflicting indicators.Yesterday I almost wrote "Wait until it reaches 0.091130 to talk." Today I deleted that sentence.
The reason is that the chain took the first step: The Sandbox's related address deposited 92.94 million $SAND into Binance, which is about 7.32 million USD at the current price, roughly 2.2% of the daily trading volume and 3.3% of the circulating supply. And SAND is actually very thin on-chain, with only $270,000 depth in a single pool — this thing can't really be sold on-chain, it can only be sold on exchanges.
So why does the project team need money? The 1:1 compensation claim for the cross-chain bridge vulnerability on August 22 has already opened, involving 14.74 million tokens; the company cut 50% of its staff, the founder stepped down, and Animoca took over; the business is still shifting from the metaverse to Web3 applications and Launchpad. None of these three are profitable, they only spend money.
There is another key change: yesterday the fee rate was −0.3250%, today it narrowed to −0.0469%, and the open interest actually rose by 9.6%. This means the "short squeeze" phase is almost over, and future rises will depend on real buying pressure. And today's high was 0.080790, not even surpassing yesterday's peak.
To be honest, I lost money in this wave. The short grid net loss was 197.92, and the account dropped from 723.54 to 610.48. I read the chain correctly, but entered too early — this is something I've been thinking about these past few days.