Orbit Post Sitemap
$SOL
The amplitude is large, so why doesn't it equal high returns?
The 24-hour price range observed this morning was 117.13—123.79, with a trading volume of about 126 million USDT.
The intraday high-low difference is obvious, yet it remains below the window starting point. The two-way fluctuation increases the risk of making a correct judgment but entering at a poor position.
I will observe whether the volume subsequently breaks through 123.79 and holds on the pullback; if such a structure appears, it will increase the judgment of continuation. The opposing risk is insufficient support and failed rebound; if it breaks below 117.13 and the rebound cannot recover, the judgment will be downgraded. The above boundaries come from the morning window, and subsequent market changes need to be rechecked.$ZEC's current pullback is much weaker than $BTC and $ETH, with its resilience coming from ETF capital inflows and shielded pool lockups. Going forward, it is possible that funds will continue to divert to ZEC, the privacy sector will accelerate differentiation, and ZEC will have a compliance advantage due to optional disclosure; however, if the $1233 support breaks, short-term risks remain. Overall, ZEC is shifting toward a privacy-oriented store of value asset, potentially continuing to diverge from mainstream coins.
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2%
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 🔥This early morning move of BTC is quite interesting: after dropping to 83884, the bears suddenly lost momentum!
📉 The price quickly dipped but did not continue to expand downward; instead, it recovered to around 84545. For short-term trading, this "unable to fall further" state is more worth watching than a simple rise.
🔍 On the 15-minute chart, MA5, MA10, and MA20 are gradually converging, indicating that the previous downtrend is slowing, and the market is compressing volatility, waiting to choose a direction.
💡 If volume breaks through 84600 and holds, this bottom test may be further confirmed; but if 84000 is broken again, it means the bulls' support is still not strong enough.
🛑 So there is no need to rush to guess the top or bottom now; the key levels will naturally provide answers.
⚡ Real opportunities often do not appear at the most hectic times but when the direction is about to be chosen.
Do you think BTC will first surge to 84600 or first retest 84000? #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 Last night, this wave of BTC really scared me 😂
Before the non-farm payrolls were announced, Bitcoin kept rising steadily, and after the data came out, it continued to surge, at one point nearly reaching the previous high.
At that time, I was thinking:
Could it really surge to 90,000 or even 100,000 this time?
I added margin to over 80,000, but my bros kept reminding me the risk was still there.
Sure enough, not long after, the market reversed directly, dropping below 84,000 at one point in the early morning, and only then did I finally breathe a sigh of relief.
This time I managed to hold on, but holding a position is really tough.
The US added only 29,000 jobs in September, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%, with macro data continuing to affect market sentiment.
Just because I held on this time doesn’t mean I can next time.
Bros, did you make a profit or a loss last night? 👇
$BTC $ETH #BTC #NonFarm #BitcoinKeep an eye on SOL during the session. Current price is 119.47, it fell back from around 122 over the weekend, with average volume and sporadic buying below 118. The order book suggests this pullback looks more like profit-taking by bulls rather than a real sell-off. You can see the funding rate is still positive but not maxed out, indicating bulls aren't that determined. The 122 to 125 range above is this week's trapped zone; without volume, it won't break through. The 116 level below is intraday support; if broken, it will drop to 112. Weekend sessions like this are the worst time to chase because any macro news during the two-day market closure can cause volatility. In terms of handling, hold what you have and watch for 116 to hold as support; if you don't have any, don't buy near the 119 upper edge. Wait for next week's liquidity to return and for direction to become clear. During the session, everything depends on key levels; emotions are just noise. $SOL #SOL延续涨势，资金与链上需求共振 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #Solana通胀缩减提案获投票通过 🔥The low point at 83884 might be the fiercest battleground between BTC bulls and bears tonight!
📌The price rebounded from 83884 to 84545, which looks like just a few hundred points of recovery, but the real significance is: after the drop, it did not continue to make new lows.
🧠The 15-minute moving averages have also changed, with MA5, MA10, and MA20 gradually converging, indicating the market is shifting from a rapid decline to a compressed consolidation.
📊Looking at the volume, after the price stopped falling, there was no panic-driven surge in volume; short-term selling pressure is clearly weaker than before.
🚧But we can’t call a reversal just yet. 84600 is a hurdle the bulls must overcome, while 84000 is the first line of defense below.
🚀If it holds above 84600, market sentiment may further recover; if it falls below 84000, be cautious of retesting 83884.
Brothers, if it were you, would you choose to buy the dip on the left side or wait for a breakout on the right side? #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 ZEC fell 4.3% today to 1,320, showing relative weakness among privacy coins. On-chain data shows clear large holder activity. Previously, ZEC doubled from a low due to privacy narratives and ETF expectations, with a high concentration of holdings. Now near the previous high around 1,400, profit-taking and early whales have started to offload. Looking at funding rates and large transfers, there have been significant ZEC movements from cold wallets to exchanges in recent days; such moves usually indicate distribution rather than accumulation. However, the privacy narrative remains intact, and in the long term, ZEC is still a scarce asset in the privacy sector. The short-term key support is at 1,280; breaking below this suggests distribution is not over and it may test 1,200 for support. If it holds, after large holders finish selling, there will still be buyers for the narrative. Don't wait for a reversal during the decline; wait until the on-chain inflow to exchanges slows down. The 319 million BTC Liquid proposal also makes the market more cautious. $ZEC #ZEC跻身前十，机构化进程提速 #ZEC再创新高，估值重估受关注 #ZEC再创本轮新高，逼近1700美元 $BTC $ETH Bitcoin and Ethereum are oscillating and wearing traders down, altcoins are on a crazy roller coaster
This current market really tortures traders.
BTC on the one-hour chart repeatedly forms gates, with frequent false breakouts up and down, sweeping stop losses back and forth, but Bitcoin's own volatility is actually only about 10 points, so despite the noise, the space is very limited.
In contrast, altcoins are a completely different world; BTC is just moving sideways, while altcoins often surge or plunge 20 points, with spikes being commonplace.
The main players' strategy is very clear now: use BTC's narrow oscillation to stabilize overall market sentiment, and release all the damage onto altcoins. Contract traders, whether long or short, can easily get taken out by spikes.
Prioritize BTC in the main portfolio. Bitcoin earns slowly but has a high tolerance for errors during oscillations; altcoins have high elasticity and attractive returns but are currently a high-risk gamble, so only small positions should be used to seek profits, never heavy positions.
Currently, BTC's one-hour Bollinger Bands are narrowing, with the range set between 83448 and 86459. As long as the lower boundary 83448 is not broken, it remains a range-bound market, so avoid subjective one-sided predictions;
- Regardless of direction, only after a valid breakout beyond the range boundary will a new trend open.
Reduce short-term contract trades and minimize opening and closing positions; hold BTC as the base spot position, play small positions in altcoins, and avoid chasing highs or cutting losses. Frequent trading is the biggest taboo in a range market—the more trades you open, the higher the chance of being harvested by false breakouts.
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #sec approves 3x leveraged Bitcoin and Ethereum ETP #SEC crypto asset custody new rules, plans to relax institutional self-custody restrictions
[Old Leek Observation]
I thought you could just go all-in violently. Turns out there are still details.
The US regulatory agency has approved the listing and trading on Cboe BZX of 3x Bitcoin and 3x Ether ETPs. And it's not just coins approved. 3x products for gold, silver, crude oil, and natural gas have also been approved.
Simply put, in the future, traditional US trading markets can have products that directly track the daily 3x performance of BTC and ETH.
But don't rush to understand it as "BTC can be 3x long now."
These products mainly achieve leverage through futures and reset leverage daily.
If BTC rises 10% in a day, theoretically the product aims to rise 30%; but after holding for several consecutive days, the actual returns will not simply equal BTC's cumulative increase ×3.
What is truly worth noting is another matter:
The US is continuing to place $BTC and $ETH trading tools into the product framework of traditional commodities like gold and crude oil.Some friends asked, Blast, this L2, just shuts down when it says so, do we still dare to hold ARB and other Layer 2s? To conclude first, Blast shut down because its assets dropped 98% from the peak, and its revenue couldn't cover costs. It was an operational failure of an individual project, not a collapse of the entire Rollup narrative. But it indeed serves as a wake-up call for all L2s: relying solely on airdrop expectations and locked TVL cannot sustain long-term value; there must be real fee income and ecosystem. ARB fell 3.61% today to 0.1976, mostly following the weak market, not due to fundamental problems. Its positioning remains as one of Ethereum's main scaling threads, and the developer ecosystems of Orbit and Stylus are still active. So don't dismiss the entire sector just because a minor player failed, but also don't blindly trust TVL data. The real selection criterion is just one: whether the real transactions and fees on this chain can sustain itself. $ARB #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 Microsoft's account was hacked and used to promote a Clippy-themed Meme coin.
The tweet has now been deleted.
Is this a big deal? Not really. An official account got hacked and posted a low-quality coin riding on an old Office icon; once deleted, it's over.
So why are people still rushing in? Because the word "Microsoft" looks intimidating. How to view the impact of September's nonfarm payrolls on the Federal Reserve's October decision?
More than the figure of an increase of 29,000, what is more worrisome is that the U.S. job market is "freezing."
The expected increase was 90,000, but the actual was only 29,000, and the data for the previous two months were significantly revised downward. Companies are not conducting large-scale layoffs, but they have also stopped hiring. The official unemployment rate looks acceptable, but the labor force is genuinely cooling down.
The employment structure is also intriguing: financial white-collar jobs continue to shrink, while construction and manufacturing jobs are actually increasing. What AI brings may not just be layoffs, but capital migration—funds flowing from white-collar sectors to electricity, equipment, manufacturing, and computing power fields.
The market is rapidly repricing: short-term U.S. Treasury yields are falling, but long-term yields have changed little. This also means the Federal Reserve can adjust short-term interest rates but is powerless to resolve deep-rooted issues like fiscal policy, debt, and energy. Gold is strengthening, oil prices are falling, and the market narrative has long gone beyond interest rates.
Back to the October meeting:
I lean toward the Federal Reserve choosing to hold steady.
New job additions fell far short of expectations, with a total downward revision of 60,000 for previous months, and the unemployment rate rose. After the data release, the market's pricing of a pause in rate hikes once surged to 85%.
But inflation remains a looming risk, so the possibility of a rate hike cannot be completely ruled out.
Employment has already put the brakes on monetary policy; how October will ultimately unfold depends on the upcoming inflation data. #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% $BTC $ETH $ZEC Today the market is broadly down: BTC -1.52%, ETH -1.81%, SOL -1.70%, XRP -2.52%.
But if you pull out the 7-day moving average, you'll see a different story.
AAVE is still up +15.88% over 7 days, +40.40% over 30 days. In today's broad decline, it only dropped 1.18% in 24h,
clearly more resilient than the overall market. This is the only mainstream DeFi asset still running an independent trend.
Comparing with two others in the same sector:
UNI: +59.14% over 30 days, but -5.20% over 7 days. It gained a lot but is already giving back some gains.
ZEC: +60.27% over 30 days, -14.15% over 7 days. The biggest 30-day gain but also the deepest 7-day drop—
a typical "pump and dump" pattern.
Putting the three curves together, you can see this round is not a uniform rise but internal differentiation:
some are still accumulating (AAVE), some have entered distribution (ZEC, UNI).
How to distinguish? Look at the direction of the 7-day line relative to the 30-day line.
If the 30-day gain is large but the 7-day turns negative, it usually means early investors are cashing out;
if the 30-day gain continues and the 7-day accelerates, it means new money is still coming in.
Of course, assets accelerating over 7 days also have greater volatility, so you need to weigh that yourself.
Which type do you currently hold?
$AAVE $UNI $ZEC Let's talk about LTC today. This asset usually has low visibility, but it only dropped 1.27% in 24 hours, outperforming a bunch of high beta altcoins. From a holding perspective, LTC, as a veteran payment coin, has the biggest advantage of being clean: no messy unlocks, no founder sell-offs, no flashy narratives—just pure digital silver β. When it falls, it's often when Bitcoin pulls back and funds seek low-risk positions; today is a typical example. Structurally, LTC has reclaimed the $69 level with moderate volume, not a sharp rally but more like institutions slowly accumulating. The logic of holding it has never been about getting rich quick, but as a ballast in a portfolio: if Bitcoin keeps bulling, LTC will eventually catch up; if it turns bearish, its decline is usually smaller than high beta altcoins. This kind of holding doesn't require daily monitoring—checking quarterly is enough. Holding is more important than fussing. $LTC #比特币矿企Riot获Anthropic算力大单 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 $WLD didn't give back all of last night's gains this time. Last night it was around 0.567, and this afternoon it even reached 0.571. It has risen nearly 7% in the past 24 hours, which I think is worth observing more. But a strong day alone doesn't mean it will continue to rise consecutively.
If the market continues to pull back next, and it can still hold steady and move up, that would be more convincing. Let's first see if it can hold the gains, no need to shout too far ahead.
$AAVE dropped from around 182 last night to 177.6, but it has still risen about 16% in the past week, retaining much of the earlier gains. I think there's no need to be completely pessimistic just because of this pullback, but we also can't use the weekly gains as a reason to assume it won't continue to fall. If it returns to last night's level later, it means the recovery still has strength; if the rebound becomes weaker and weaker, expectations should be lowered.
$SOL was around 119 at midday, and it has slightly declined over the past week. Here, I will be a bit more patient. 120 can be used as an observation point for now, but being just one dollar apart and crossing back and forth doesn't mean much. I want to see it continue to rise after reclaiming that level, not just stand above it briefly and then fall back. There's no need to participate in every coin now; understand what you can and wait for confirmation, and if unclear, watch more and act less.$BTC $ETH ｜Nonfarm payrolls positive but market dives, the situation is not contradictory!📉
Nonfarm data was a cold surprise, but Bitcoin and gold surged then fell back, many people don't understand.
The market moves in two phases:
✅Just after nonfarm release: employment far below expectations, market bets on easing rate hikes, US Treasury yields plunge quickly, BTC rallies short-term.
✅After US stock market opens, logic switches: funds stop speculating on short-term rate hikes, start trading on 【inflation + fiscal policy + term premium】
Crude oil strengthens, market worries about US long-term fiscal deficit, long-term Treasuries sold off, yields rebound, directly suppressing gold and BTC.
In one sentence:
The market shifts from "short-term interest rate expectations" to "long-term debt inflation risk."
Going forward, focus on long-term US Treasury yields!
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2%
#非农降温难压美债收益率，长期利率压力仍在 The seven-day waiting period for Optimistic Rollups is a challenge window for errors to be contested.
Optimistic Rollups by default accept batch validity and only re-execute disputed transactions when fraud proofs are submitted. To give independent validators time to detect and challenge errors, native withdrawals usually require a challenge period, commonly designed to be about seven days. This waiting is not because the system forgets to process but is part of the security model. Fast bridges can front funds to shorten the experience but expose users to additional liquidity and bridge risks. To judge whether a Rollup is secure, one must not only look at how quickly transactions confirm on the interface but also whether data is published, challengers can actually run, and if users can force exit when the sequencer fails. For the $ETH mainnet, Rollups move execution off-chain and return dispute finalization to L1, saving costs without removing validation responsibilities. The link between cheapness and security is hidden in the data and exit paths.
The challenge mechanism is only effective if someone continuously monitors and can submit proofs. The security gap between theoretically allowing challenges and having no runnable validators in reality is significant. Challenge funds and software availability determine whether the security model can truly be activated.Reviewing recent trades: never open positions on weekends.
You can't gain much profit, and once Sunday arrives, volatility can change at any time. What's even worse is that if you stare at the candlesticks for too long over the weekend, your mindset will be completely affected by those trivial small fluctuations.
After your trading behavior distorts, when a real market reversal happens, you won't even have time to set a stop loss and will be swept away by a sudden move. That's how my losses happened.
Engrave this sentence in your mind: staying out of the market on weekends is the best protection for your principal.
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% There was an incident on-chain today, worth looking at a few coins together. NEAR plummeted 5% to 4.72, the root cause being the NEAR Intents cross-chain bridge was attacked, with preliminary losses of about 3.8 million USD. The team said it has been fixed and fully compensated, but the cross-chain trust broken is hard to restore immediately. This exposes a common vulnerability in the entire intent trading track: aggregating multi-chain liquidity improves convenience but also increases the attack surface. You see ARB, OP, these L2s are also working on similar interoperability; NEAR’s drop serves as a wake-up call for the whole industry that cross-chain bridges remain the most fragile link in the ecosystem. So today it’s not just NEAR’s problem; any short-term narratives riding on chain abstraction must be re-evaluated for security premiums. Funds will first withdraw from flawed targets and only return after audits and reviews. The 3998 BTC withdrawn from Liquid Network is a similar warning. $NEAR #NEAR生态协议被盗380万美元资金全额追回 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 Conclusion first: While the overall market fell, $IMX rose against the trend. Today, this 4H candle broke the previous high with huge volume, not following the sector but moving on its own.
Data speaks:
$IMX rose from 0.1717 to 0.192 in 24h, +11.7%. Note the context: BTC -1.6%, ETH -1.9%, market breadth 105 up / 165 down. Running an independent gain in this environment is not retail behavior.
The key is the 4H candle at 12: O=0.1901 H=0.2032 L=0.1852 C=0.1918, volume 6.22 million contracts — 1.6 times the previous 3.79 million, and 4.7 times the 1.33 million at 04:00 this morning. Volume and price rose together, confirming a valid breakout.
Looking further back: $IMX started this wave at 0.162 on 9-27, with five bullish candles over three days and no significant pullback. The daily high today reached 0.2032, higher than the local high of 0.1949 on 9-28 — the first new high in 5 days.
$IMX is an L2 infrastructure, different narrative from metaverse tokens like $SAND and $ENJ. Today, while metaverse tokens surged then fell back, $IMX established its own breakout rhythm.
Do you think this L2 wave is driven by capital rotation or an independent logic?Yesterday's nonfarm payrolls were positive, and the semiconductor rebound was quite good, with the Nasdaq pulling back after breaking new highs.
However, storage has been affected by news; previously, despite price increases, no new factories were being built. But now, some are being constructed. The next question is whether Seagate and Western Digital will follow suit, and it's highly likely they will expand production. Data center growth is still ongoing, but locking orders without production or delivery turns into financial leverage. HDD leads the way; will others be far behind? So the reason SanDisk and Micron also pulled back yesterday mostly relates to supply-side bearishness. Currently, there's no way to boost gross or net profit again; price hikes won't last long due to supply expansion, similar to the logic behind Micron's recent decline—physical limits.
To capture data center market share, they can't keep locking orders indefinitely. They can afford to wait because the difference lies in the grid connection time, which is longer than the storage cycle.
Therefore, the market is a bit chaotic now, lacking the resonance and various optimistic expectations seen before July. It's better to be cautious and trade less.
With the rebound relatively high, continue shorting Hynix.
$SKHYNIX $SNDK
#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% Market sentiment is very hot, but DOGE remains calmly alone. The Fear and Greed Index is stuck at 72, in the greed zone, with funds flowing in, just not into Dogecoin.
This is not DOGE's problem; it's a matter of queue order. As the overall market sentiment warms up, the flow of funds follows a sequence: first BTC, the anchor of institutional holdings; then ETH, the foundation of the ecosystem narrative; followed by SOL, the flexible first choice. By the time it’s DOGE’s turn, the positions are already taken. This structural marginalization repeats in every greed cycle; the hotter the index, the longer the tail of the queue.
Dogecoin’s chip structure determines its position. Without an ETF channel to absorb new inflows, without staking yields to lock in existing holdings, most holders are retail investors waiting for the wind. When the wind comes, it blows elsewhere first. Musk’s topics occasionally ignite a fuse, but the fuse doesn’t burn far on this damp market.
The calm $DOGE is a mirror reflecting market stratification. The greed index measures total sentiment, while price reflects capital choices. The total amount is rising, but the choice bypasses it. For holders, this may not be bad: a marginal position means low crowding. Once the main line saturates and funds overflow, the tail will become the head. Until then, one must get used to the excitement belonging to others. 📊 Technical analysis after the non-farm payrolls. BTC is currently at 84,637, having pulled back from the non-farm high of 86,500 over the weekend. On the 4-hour chart, it is consolidating below 85,000. The super trend line is bullish but flattening, with upward momentum weakening. The MA50 provides dynamic support at 83,800, while the MA200 is further below 80K. Three scenarios: Scenario one, stabilizing over the weekend with volume, reclaiming 85,500, targeting the previous high of 88,000; Scenario two, continuing to oscillate between 82K and 85K range until next week; Scenario three, ETF net outflows continue, breaking below 82,000 to test the 80K psychological level. Currently, scenario two is more likely, as BTC ETF saw nine consecutive days of buying before turning to a net outflow of 150 million on 10/2, indicating short-term buying fading. Conclusion: Do not chase above 85.5K, no panic if 82K holds, wait for next week's data to provide direction. $BTC #BTC财库优先股融资升温 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 Please give me a break.
$BTC touched 87,200 yesterday, $ETH surged to 2,777, now back to 84,600 and 2,675. The 15-minute chart has dropped about ten times, then slowly climbed back; short-term trading is just this grinding.
Will this bull market only end at 100,000 and 3,000? Don’t rush to set the finish line. Whether it can still rise in October depends on data, capital, and sentiment, not the calendar. The softer non-farm payrolls gave a breather, but ETF outflows and high US Treasury yields are still weighing down. The rise and fall indicate many trapped positions above; to break the previous highs in one go, it must first hold above 85,000 and 2,700.
Gold is about to break below 4,100; at this level before, BTC was just over 50,000, ETH 1,900. Now gold and crypto have decoupled, each following its own logic. Big money influences the strength or weakness of the dollar, so don’t use old maps to find new roads.
Long or short? I only know chasing highs easily leads to standing by, selling in a drop easily leads to cutting losses. Wait for a pullback confirmation, try light positions, and set stop losses. The bull market won’t miss a day or two; staying alive means there’s a next wave.
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温
#非农降温难压美债收益率，长期利率压力仍在
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 1 billion coins, cost 4 million, sold for 5.36 million.
Just saw this data, my first reaction was: making this money is way too easy.
Entered private placement in July last year at a price of 0.004, held for more than a year, today fully transferred to Coinbase Prime, sold at 0.0054.
Simply put — someone is willing to take the position at this level.
A 34% profit is pretty good in traditional markets, but honestly, in the crypto world, it's not exaggerated.
What I'm curious about is another thing: why sell now?
My guess is that the private placement group might feel the short-term is about right.
After all, 1 billion coins is not a small amount; if they really dump it on the market, whether the price can hold is another matter.
So the question is — do you think this is smart money exiting, or just normal profit-taking?
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温
#Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 #SEC加密资产托管新规，拟放宽机构自托管限制 $BTC CoinCodex gives a prediction of $DOGE at $0.1954 on November 4, corresponding to a 105% return potential over 32 days. This figure is more like a mathematical extrapolation from the model rather than a market consensus.
This prediction is not an analyst's call but an algorithmic system: the model reads historical price sequences, volatility, volume, and market cycles, using machine learning to fit recurring patterns from the past and then projects forward. Its strength is in recognizing rhythms; its weakness is that it cannot see the off-chain world—it doesn't know when the next tweet, the next policy, or the next institutional capital inflow will come.
What does doubling in 32 days require? Looking back at DOGE's history, such a level of monthly increase is always ignited by strong catalysts: celebrity endorsements, rumors of payment adoption, or rotation of large market funds. Currently, these conditions are absent: macro liquidity is stable, on-chain activity has not increased, and derivatives positions are moderate. The model cannot encode "no catalyst" into its formula; it only treats past rising paths as possibly repeating.
Credibility is rated at three out of ten. Algorithmic predictions are suitable for gauging direction and volatility range but not for target prices. $0.1954 is more like the right tail of a probability distribution: possible, but betting on it is equivalent to betting on an unexpected event occurring in the next month. A pragmatic use is to treat it as a volatility signal—the model believes $DOGE is entering a high volatility window, so leave room in position management, rather than taking a single output line as a promise.The ECG is already alarming, but the patient is still lying on the table without an open chest—this is exactly what $MORPHO looks like at this moment. A 24-hour blood loss of 4.54%—this is not cardiac arrest, but myocardial stunning: the myocardium is still contracting, but each pump is weaker, and perfusion pressure is slowly declining.
First, look at the short-term vital signs. The 1-hour RSI is only 34.9, sliding toward the edge of bradycardia, but not yet in the ventricular fibrillation zone that requires defibrillation. The daily RSI is 48.9, indicating that this circulatory system is still in the compensatory phase; compensation does not mean health, only that collapse has not yet occurred.
Next, look at the position of the Bollinger Bands, which is what really makes me frown. In the short term, the price is stuck at the 12% position, with only a 0.9% buffer from the lower band, while the upper band remains high at +6.5%—the vascular lumen is compressed, and the pressure inside is being transmitted to the vessel walls. The mid-term is even worse: the price is at an extremely low 4% percentile, only 0.3% from the lower band, but there is 6.2% space above. This is not a pullback; this is pericardial effusion, where the space between the visceral and parietal layers is being gradually consumed, restricting diastolic filling of the heart and potentially progressing to tamponade at any time.
Therefore, my judgment is: this is a clearly defined ischemic lesion, not emotional palpitations. The repeated probing near the lower band essentially represents compensatory spasms of tissue under low perfusion.
From an operational perspective, I would not rashly intervene at the 1.91 level. The real surgical window is below:
📈 Long:
Entry: 1.86 (current price -2.3%)
Take Profit 1: 2.06 (+8.0%)
Take Profit 2: 2.03 (+6.2%)
Stop Loss: 1.69 (-11.6%)
The logic of this plan is: wait for the price to drop another 2.3%, reach the lower band support zone, then establish extracorporeal circulation. Take Profit 1 at +8.0% corresponds to the first wave of reperfusion after the anastomosis is patent; Take Profit 2 at +6.2% is a conservative weaning point—note that the two target levels are only 1.8 percentage points apart, indicating limited upside space, which reflects poor ventricular compliance. Don’t expect a big bullish candle to complete the bypass.
It must be clearly stated that the risk structure is: stop loss at -11.6% versus upside of +8.0%, an asymmetric hemodynamic curve. This means the procedure has a very low tolerance for error; position size must be halved, equivalent to halving preoperative blood preparation and increasing anesthesia depth. Any intubation fluctuation could breach the 1.69 aortic clamp limit—once crossed, distal organs enter irreversible ischemic necrosis.
What needs monitoring most now is not the price, but whether the 0.3% distance to the lower band will be breached. Breach means tamponade; tamponade means open-chest decompression, and all long positions will require intensive care.
Sinus rhythm still has a chance to recover, but myocardial enzyme levels are already rising.$BTC $ETH
Last night's market movement was actually quite interesting.
After the non-farm payrolls unexpectedly cooled down, US Treasury yields dropped, and BTC instantly surged, but today BTC returned to around 84600, and ETH also went back to around 2680.
This indicates that the market is not simply trading on "rate cuts/hikes" but is repeatedly repricing the Federal Reserve's next move.
The most dangerous situation in this kind of market is the first big bullish candle after chasing the news. #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 The US-Iran situation + G7 releasing reserves: In the short term, releasing 100 million barrels of reserves can suppress oil prices and ease inflation expectations, which is a positive sentiment for risk assets like BTC. However, the geopolitical conflict remains unresolved, and oil prices could rebound at any time, so it is not advisable to chase the highs. Spot players continue to defend, keeping enough cash to wait for clearer signals. Controlling your impulses is better than anything 🐮The most dangerous situation on the chessboard is never being in check, but thinking you have the initiative—$LTC is exactly in such a position now: a 2.9% increase over 24H, the price clinging to 94% of the upper Bollinger Band, with only 0.2% breathing room to the upper band and 2.5% to the lower band. This is not the start of a breakout; it is a typical structure of pawn overextension and loss of central support.
The short-term RSI has pushed to 67.3, the long-term to 61.1—both wings approaching the overbought threshold simultaneously, like two bishops diagonally blocking all retreat paths for the opponent. It looks aggressive, but the squares behind are all empty. The signal points to short; I interpret it as the opponent just made an overextended sacrificial charge, while my king’s fortress remains intact.
My strategy is clear—I won’t immediately reverse at 47.19, but will position my pieces to ambush at 48.60. That is a bait level 3.0% above the current price, waiting for the opponent to push one more pawn and completely disrupt the structure before I make my move. This is about waiting for the opponent to create weaknesses themselves, not calculating for them.
📉 Short:
Entry: 48.60 (current price +3.0%)
Take Profit 1: 45.87 (-2.8%)
Take Profit 2: 44.75 (-5.2%)
Stop Loss: 54.25 (+15.0%)
The first target 45.87 is the equilibrium point after exchanging pawns; the second target 44.75 is the true endpoint of the passed pawn—7.9% downward space from entry. Compared to a 15.0% stop loss above, this is not a favorable risk-reward endgame. Therefore, the position size must be as precise as endgame moves: small, accurate, and unwavering. The stop loss at 54.25 is equivalent to voluntarily sacrificing an entire flank pawn to buy time for the midgame transition. Whoever adds to their position here is self-destructing in an endless game.
The truly profitable player doesn’t play move by move but calculates the position twenty moves ahead before placing a piece. The midgame of this game has not yet begun; I only need to hold that square e4. #strategyplaybookMid-term outlook for SOL. Current price 119.47, down 2.09% in 24 hours, following Bitcoin's pullback but with a smaller drop compared to many altcoins, showing relative resilience. Structurally, SOL has risen from 110 this round; 120 is a psychological barrier. If it doesn't hold today, it will pull back to 115 for support; only if it stabilizes there can we look toward 130. The mid-term logic remains unchanged: network activity, meme launch platform, and institutional ETF expectations are still intact, just temporarily pressured by weekend liquidity and macro factors. Regarding ETFs, the probability of Solana spot approval is fully priced in; once approved, it will be a mid-term catalyst. For operations, mid-term positions can be held; short-term, don't panic sell below 120, consider adding on pullbacks between 115 and 118. Set stop loss below 110; breaking that means the structure is broken. Everyone understands SOL's elasticity; holding through is more important than guessing right. $SOL #SOL延续涨势，资金与链上需求共振 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 The narrative and chip structure of XRP have always been twisted. On one hand, the US XRP ETF currently holds about 1.19 billion tokens, equivalent to 1.77 billion USD, with institutions slowly building positions as real locked-in capital; on the other hand, short-term funds keep harvesting repeatedly around 1.49, and today it fell another 1.92%, lukewarm and uninspiring. The biggest fear for this kind of asset is not a drop, but no one talking about it. Its anchor is as a compliant cross-border settlement coin, and every time the SEC or bank cooperation stirs up some noise, it pulses, relying on real adoption for sustainability. Now, institutions occupy an increasing share in the chip structure, while retail floating chips are decreasing; the process from decentralization to concentration is often a prelude to a slow bull market. But today the market is weak, and XRP fell along with it; the key is to watch the 1.46 support—if it breaks, it means short-term sentiment has leaked again. Don't expect it to double in a day like a meme coin; the way to play XRP is to trade time for space. $XRP #韩国全北银行接入Ripple，XRP能否受益 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #OKXNOW：未来已至，重磅内容正在揭晓 The impact of non-farm payroll data on the Fed's rate hike in October
The most noteworthy aspect of this non-farm payroll is not the 29,000 itself but that the U.S. job market is beginning to freeze
Expected 90,000, actual 29,000, and the data for the previous two months was significantly revised downward. Companies are not laying off many employees but are also reluctant to hire. The unemployment rate appears stable, but the labor market is clearly cooling down
What’s more interesting is the structure:
White-collar jobs in finance and other sectors continue to decline, while jobs in construction, manufacturing, and other areas have increased. The impact of AI may not just be "job reduction" but a reallocation of funds from white-collar jobs to electricity, equipment, manufacturing, and computing power.
The market quickly adjusted its rate hike expectations; short-term U.S. Treasury yields fell significantly, but the long-term response was limited—indicating that the Fed can influence policy rates but cannot solve fiscal, debt, and energy issues.
Gold continues to strengthen, and oil prices have fallen, which also shows that the market is now trading on more than just interest rates
So finally, about the October rate hike
I currently lean towards no change in October
The 29,000 non-farm payroll is clearly below expectations, the previous two months were revised down by a total of 60,000, and the unemployment rate has started to rise. After this employment data was released, the market’s pricing for an October rate hike has clearly cooled, with the probability of no change rising to about 85%
Of course, inflation remains the Fed’s biggest concern, so it cannot be said that a rate hike in October is 100% off the table
But at least for now, employment has started to put the brakes on the Fed rather than pressing the accelerator
What will truly decide the October meeting is whether inflation data can continue to justify a rate hike#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% $BTC spot ETFs saw a net outflow of about $8.2 million on October 1st, with an even larger outflow of $152 million on September 30th.
$BTC itself experienced continuous capital withdrawals in early October, with a cumulative outflow of $118 million in recent days.
Throughout September, BTC spot ETFs still managed to absorb a net inflow of about $2.65 billion, and ETH had $830 million. So the current outflows are not a complete exit by major players, but rather a divergence among funds that entered earlier at this level.
This is the most intriguing aspect right now: prices remain high, but incremental off-exchange capital is unwilling to continue supporting.
It's like climbing a mountain—you've reached halfway up, but the supply trucks behind haven't caught up. How long you can hold on depends entirely on the remaining strength. The market focus is quietly shifting from "can prices keep rising" to "who is still providing new buying power."
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% Don't just focus on the big coin today, the small cap PYTH quietly climbed over 3%, with volume picking up above 0.078. This oracle sector small-cap asset is much more elastic than the big coin; a slight move by big money can send it flying. But trading it is still trading it—PYTH isn't just pure meme sentiment; it also has real adoption backing from the Solana ecosystem oracle, making it a bit more stable than pure air. The strategy is simple: break above the previous high of 0.08 with volume and follow through; if it falls below today's opening price of 0.076, exit immediately—don't get emotionally attached. The whole sector is weak today, dragged down by BTC's pullback; PYTH moving against the red shows there is capital picking up the dip. Resistance is at 0.082 above, support at 0.074 below; breaking either means the catch-up rally is over. Trading small caps is like licking a knife's edge—keep your position size at a level you can sleep with; profits are luck, losses don't blame the market. $PYTH #OKX预言家：第二赛季即将收官 #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 Macroeconomic Data Released: Buy the Rumor, Sell the Fact, Divergence in the Performance of Three Major Assets
Employment increased by only 29,000, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%, far worse than market expectations. In theory, weak employment data would strengthen market expectations for rate cuts, benefiting risk assets. However, the market did not experience a mindless rally; instead, it showed a typical "buy the rumor, sell the fact" pattern. After the macroeconomic positive news was released, funds took the opportunity to cash out, and market sentiment turned cautious.
SOL
Whales have recently taken slight profits, with the price retreating after surging to 124.95. Selling pressure has appeared above, so short-term attention should be paid to the support strength at key levels. The attack level is seen at 123, and the defense level is at 116.
HYPE
Despite positive buyback news acting as a catalyst, market reaction was limited, with the price surging and then falling back. On-chain data shows whale holdings are diverging, increasing the long-short disagreement. The attack level is seen at 91.5, and the defense level is at 85.
$XRP
ETF-related news is still unfolding, and the market is awaiting further policy guidance. Before clear signals emerge, it is expected to maintain a range-bound oscillation, with a recommendation to mainly observe. #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 Woke up to a market crash.
I was up over $480 on $PEPE yesterday but didn't sell, now I'm down over $300. Every time I blink, money disappears. I thought if I waited a little longer it would go higher, but waiting only brought disappointment. Now seeing the red in my account really hurts.
Taking a step back, you can't be greedy. In trading, being content and sticking to your own plan is what matters most.
$BTC $ETH#USNFPDataCools $BTC $BTC
After the non-farm payrolls came out last night, BTC once surged to around 87200, but was quickly pushed back down.
In September, US non-farm payrolls only increased by 29,000, significantly below the market expectation of 90,000, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%.
The data itself is somewhat positive for risk assets, but BTC couldn't hold above 87000, indicating that selling pressure above remains heavy. Moving forward, rather than "positive news," I want to see if 87000 can truly hold. Discussing the impact of the nonfarm payroll data on the Federal Reserve's October interest rate decision.
This time, the focus is not on the 29,000 figure, but on the fact that the U.S. labor market is already showing signs of "freezing."
The expected increase was 90,000, but the actual was only 29,000, and the data for the previous two months was significantly revised downward. Companies are not laying off many people, but they are also reluctant to hire. The unemployment rate appears stable, but the labor force has actually cooled down.
The employment structure is also quite interesting: financial white-collar jobs continue to shrink, while construction and manufacturing jobs have increased. The changes brought by AI may not just be about eliminating jobs, but about capital flowing from white-collar industries to electricity, equipment, manufacturing, and computing power sectors.
The market quickly repriced interest rate expectations: short-term U.S. Treasury yields fell, but long-term changes were limited. This also shows that the Federal Reserve can adjust policy rates but finds it difficult to solve deep-rooted issues like fiscal policy, debt, and energy. Gold strengthened, oil prices fell, and the market is trading on more than just the interest rate narrative.
Back to the October meeting:
I tend to think the Federal Reserve will hold steady this time.
The 29,000 new jobs are far below expectations, the previous values were revised down by a total of 60,000, and the unemployment rate rose. After the data release, the market priced in an 85% probability of a pause in rate hikes.
However, inflation remains the Federal Reserve's biggest concern, so the possibility of a rate hike cannot be completely ruled out.
Employment has already started to put the brakes on monetary policy. Ultimately, how October will go depends on whether subsequent inflation data can still provide a basis for rate hikes. #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% $BTC $BTC The main force behind $BTC is just that good at playing
They used yesterday's non-farm payroll to wipe out most of the shorts who had stop losses around 87000
Including me
After waking up yesterday, I didn't care about the price and went in again
I was betting on one thing
And it really was a fake breakout
First, let's see if it can break the previous low at 82500
Then there's the continuously rising 4H MA200
In a few days, it should rise to around 81000 The Achilles' heel of PONS is actually not the narrative, but that no one is willing to wait even one more second for it. How many more days can you hold that "faith ticket" in your hand? I've been pondering a question recently: who will be the last survivor in this meme cycle? Watching the group go from spamming every day to gradually quieting down, I'm increasingly convinced that the real fragility is not the price, but patience. PONS has recently been regarded as the strongest challenger, yet it hasn't even shown the ambition to build its own Swap, which makes me a bit discouraged. A meme without underlying infrastructure to support it, no matter how fast it rises, is like a rootless potted plant that will tilt with the wind. In contrast, PUMP's team is from the post-2000 generation. While we were still shouting orders and chasing small coins in the group, they were already building their own territory. This kind of awareness and execution honestly made me stop and think for a long time. Not because they are young, but because they are really building a product. From 0.0026 to 0.0061, I sold S at the top and bought B again when it pulled back to support. Now the price is back near 0.0055, with MA20 steadily supporting at 0.00455, and MACD hasn't deteriorated. Plus, Ansem publicly said that Q4 is overall bullish, giving a positive evaluation for PUMP entering a new cycle. But what I want to say is another layer. The market is no longer trading on "who will rise," but on "who is still worth waiting for." After the FOMO tide recedes, hesitation and narrative fatigue become the dominant emotions. The bullish logic of PUMP is very clear: product ambition plusTesla's Q3 delivery beat matters less as a demand verdict than as a reset of near-term expectations. Deliveries topped forecasts while production lagged deliveries, suggesting an inventory drawdown may have helped bridge the gap.
The earnings report should show whether that mix translated into durable margins, not just a headline relief rally.
#TeslaQ3Deliveries How do I explain my short position on $ZEC? I've held it for 2 days and experienced a 7% drop.
Let me explain again to avoid misleading anyone:
1. I usually trade spot and avoid contracts. Because in 2022, I lost several million due to a contract liquidation, which was very painful. I realized that even low leverage can lead to liquidation.
2. I only open low-leverage contracts with money I can afford to lose when I believe there's a high probability of a price drop. For example, I only used 3x leverage on ZEC.
3. Of course, I know that 10x or 50x leverage can earn more, but it can also lose a lot. The people in the screenshots are victims of high leverage on $BTC.
So why do I think $ZEC is likely to drop?
After breaking the support level, it didn’t have a decent rebound. The difference between a real break and a wick is this: a wick is recovered the next day, but a break means the price gets lower day by day.
Also, the old holders are exiting while new holders are entering. Whether the baton can be passed successfully will take time to verify.
That’s why I dare to open a small position with low leverage to short it.Teachers, the non-farm payroll data has been released, with only 29,000 new jobs added and the unemployment rate rising to 4.2%, far worse than market expectations.
Theoretically, weaker employment should strengthen rate cut expectations, but the market did not blindly rally; this is a typical case of buying the rumor and selling the fact.
Looking at three assets:
$SOL: Whales have recently taken some small profits, retreating after a high of 124.95. Attack level at 123, defense level at 116.
$HYPE: The positive buyback news had limited catalyst effect, rallying then falling back, with whale holdings showing divergence. Attack level at 91.5, defense level at 85.
$XRP: The ETF story is still ongoing, but short-term momentum is weakening. Attack level at 1.54, defense level at 1.43.
Data release does not equal a one-sided market; do not rush in just because of good news. The market is very conflicted, and chasing gains in a volatile pattern has very low cost-effectiveness. 1003 07:59
Brothers and sisters, I woke up to the sky falling! 😱
Where should I go from here?
Thinking about quitting the circle, please advise me, give me some tips 🥺
At midnight, the account still had over 8000, but when I opened my eyes, only 7000 was left; luckily, yesterday's profits cushioned the blow, so the damage isn't too deep.
$BTC 100x long stopped out at 84000, actual loss 1520, return rate -213%. I originally bet on oscillation above 83500, but the spike directly taught me a lesson; high leverage full position is just gambling on size.
$SAND short is even more painful, last night had 600 floating profit but didn't take it, didn't reach the take-profit line, now floating loss is 500, one in and one out evaporated 1100. The 10x small coin shorts on CAPU and ENJ were also emotional trades, liquidity is thin, easy to be shaken by the market.
Current market: post-nonfarm rate cut expectations fluctuate, BTC/ETH spot ETF inflows slow down, US Treasury yields remain high, risk asset sentiment cools. The BTC structure isn't completely broken yet, but don't use 100x leverage to test your judgment. Stop for now, switch to isolated margin, floating profits must be protected, no trades without a plan. Don't think about quitting the circle yet, survive this week first. $BTC $ETH $ZEC Let's look at the historical time cycles:
End of 2019 bottom → All-time high: 728 days
End of 2022 bottom → All-time high: 476 days
Interestingly, the time required for the cycle is shortening.
If this pace continues to accelerate, will this time from bottom to all-time high be faster than 476 days?
Even less than 400 days?
If so, BTC's all-time high of $120,000 might not be as far away as imagined.
Time will tellThe low position of $NEAR is starting to attract attention, but cheapness alone can never replace evidence of a bottom.
Let's break down this market move into a conditional test:
Directional evidence: Both the 1-hour and 4-hour charts are weak, with RSI at 38 and 24 respectively. Oversold conditions can explain the demand for a rebound but cannot alone prove a trend reversal; price stopping new lows first is more convincing than any statement like "it can't fall further."
Positional evidence: Current price is 4.701, about 2.36% above the 1-hour support at 4.59, and about 6.79% below resistance at 5.02. The space is not determined by sentiment; ultimately, it depends on which of these two boundaries is effectively broken first.
The next step is not based on guessing. My observation line is clear: only by standing back above and holding 5.02 can the short-term initiative be regained; if it breaks below 4.59, attention should shift to the 4-hour support at 4.59. If the upper side continues to be pressured, the 4-hour resistance at 5.54 is temporarily just a distant reference, not a preset target.
I don't only share when my judgments are correct. How the price chooses between 5.02 and 4.59 next will be publicly reviewed in the next round.
Do you think oversold conditions alone are enough to change your judgment?
The market is volatile; the above is only a market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is Coin Circle NiuNiu speaking.Chuanmu's Chant
Regular investment as the foundation, users as the core.
If you have money, save money; if you don't, withdraw money.
Saving is for idle funds, withdrawing is for urgent needs.
With both saving and withdrawing, funds flow.
You withdraw, I save, preventing a run.
You save, I save, everyone saves together.
When everyone saves, everyone wins.
The bank operates, funds settle.
Fame in three years, king in ten.
Ten thousand people invest regularly, building a golden pool together.
PS: Only a banking mindset can achieve greatness; speculative tricks are just a mess. Funds that cannot settle are all ineffective assets. This is not a phase of chasing the rise, but more like a fast-paced game of shaking out positions. Have you noticed that the moment the price surges the most is often when the sentiment is the most dangerous? Last night, BTC surged straight to around 87,200, and ETH also broke through 2,750, catching the shorts off guard. In 24 hours, nearly 78,000 global liquidations occurred, with a total liquidation amount of about $358 million, the largest single liquidation happened on BTCUSDT, valued at $11.72 million. Negative funding rates have accumulated for too long, forcing shorts to pay to hold positions, and a single bullish candle sent them all off. But the story isn't over. BTC dropped directly from above 87,200 back below 84,000, and ETH fell from 2,750 to around 2,660. Those who chased the highs were immediately squeezed out, both sides got hurt. This is not a one-sided market; it's a tug-of-war between sentiment and leverage. The signal I see: US Treasury yields remain relatively high, and whenever prices spike, there are sell-offs. Whales are quietly accumulating at low levels, while retail investors mostly watch from the sidelines. In this structure, rises are short squeezes, and falls are profit-taking; rhythm matters more than direction. In cross-market linkage, BTC and ETH show strong synchronicity this time, indicating that capital preference remains with mainstream coins, and altcoins have yet to receive significant spillover. If BTC can hold above 84,000 and ETH defends 2,660, risk appetite may recover, giving altcoins a chance to rotate. Conversely, if US Treasury yields continue to press down, BTC fails to hold 84,000, and ETH breaks below 2,660, this rebound will just be short covering, not a trend reversal. Bullish path: after negative funding rate correction, if spot can take over The U.S. SEC has approved Volatility Shares to launch a 3x leveraged ETP on Cboe, covering Bitcoin, Ethereum, as well as traditional commodities like gold and crude oil, now all having the same compliant high-leverage vehicle.
Many people's first reaction: liquidity boost, bull market celebration. But those who have used high-leverage tools understand that such products can easily become a capital-consuming crusher for ordinary retail investors.
It uses a daily rebalancing mechanism, and volatility causes huge losses. BTC price spikes of 5-10% can happen; even if the coin price fluctuates and returns to the original point, a few days of sideways movement will continuously erode a large portion of the 3x leveraged ETP's net asset value.
Regulatory approval does not mean "injecting liquidity" into the crypto market, but rather aligning crypto assets with traditional commodities by turning volatility into a compliant tradable product.
The issuer profits from management fees and rebalancing loss gains; institutions gain a compliant account for intraday hedging and arbitrage tools.
If retail investors hold this for the long term, they will easily find it is not a bull market amplifier but rather indirectly provides liquidity for institutions.
Do not blindly celebrate; understanding the loss mechanism of derivatives is more important than simply betting on price rises or falls.
$BTC $ETH
Risk warning: Leveraged financial products carry extremely high risks, and virtual currency trading is not protected by domestic laws. #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温