The G7 just announced releasing 100 million barrels of oil reserves to suppress oil prices.
Yet Brent crude remains above $102.
And OPEC+? They just held a meeting and decided to keep production unchanged in November.
What does this mean?
It means the G7 is shooting itself in the foot while OPEC+ watches the show.
On the G7 side: On October 2, they decided to release up to 100 million barrels of crude and refined products over the next four months, prioritizing diesel in the first 20 days. They also promised no restrictions on energy exports.
The IEA is even more aggressive: Of the 400 million barrels promised in March, about 325 million barrels have been released by October 3, accounting for over 80%.
On the OPEC+ side: In ten words—no action, no change in November. Next meeting? November 1. The one after? November 2026.
One side is desperately firefighting, the other is sitting still watching.
Who do you think is smarter?
3/ Let's break down OPEC+'s calculations.
Why aren't they moving? They are waiting for an answer: Will the G7's 100 million barrels dumped into the market actually cause prices to fall?
If prices fall—it means releasing reserves works, and OPEC+ will consider cutting production to support prices.
If prices don't fall—it means the market doesn't buy it, and OPEC+'s spare capacity becomes absolute pricing power.
Reuters put it bluntly: The market generally expects OPEC+ will not further adjust production before the end of 2026.
Translation: They are in no hurry.
You might ask: If OPEC+ doesn't increase production, aren't they worried about losing market share?
Good question. Look at some data:
According to the IEA's August report, OPEC+'s total effective spare capacity is only 1.09 million barrels per day—production that can be brought online within 90 days and sustained.
Of that 1.09 million barrels, the eight OPEC countries with quota obligations account for only 70,000 barrels per day.
What does this mean?
The world consumes about 100 million barrels of oil daily. OPEC+'s "wild card" is only 0.1%.
It's not that they don't want to increase production; they simply can't.
Iran's Foreign Minister Alaghezi said: Conditions met, the Strait can reopen within seven days.
Trump? He outright rejected it.
Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal called at the UN: The Strait must be restored to the state before February 28, with no fees charged.
But so far, the Strait's flow remains far below pre-war levels.
About one-fifth of global oil transport is stuck in this 33-kilometer-wide waterway.
Iran is waiting for US conditions; the US is waiting for Iran to concede. Both sides are waiting for the other to blink first.
This is OPEC+'s confidence— as long as the Strait is closed, the supply gap cannot be filled.
The US Strategic Petroleum Reserve has dropped to 298.7 million barrels—the lowest since 1983, only 42% of authorized capacity.
Global oil inventories are down 507 million barrels compared to before the conflict.
IEA data shows that from February to August, global inventories have been declining at a rate of 2.8 million barrels per day.
Saudi Aramco CEO Nasser said a blunt truth: "Rebuilding these inventories will take up to two years."
The G7 is using two years' worth of reserves to fill a hole of several million barrels per day.
Can this hole be filled?
What exactly is OPEC+ waiting for?
They are waiting for the G7's bullets to run out.
Releasing reserves is temporary; production capacity is structural. Once the G7 releases this 100 million barrels, inventories will be at historic lows.
As long as OPEC+ keeps production steady, oil prices will always have a "supply gap" floor supporting them.
When the G7 runs out of ammunition, OPEC+ will decide whether to release oil—at that point, pricing power is 100% in their hands.
Whoever acts first reveals their hand.
Interestingly, oil prices actually fell a bit today.
Brent dropped from 102.53 to 100.22, down 2.25%. WTI fell below $90.
Why? Because the G7's release gave the market some breathing room.
But analysts are clear: The G7 release only "reduces short-term supply panic," the fundamental situation hasn't changed.
Around $100 is a fragile balance.
Downward requires the Strait to really reopen. Upward only needs negotiations to collapse again.
Both possibilities are real.
Binance's report analyzed: If oil prices stay above $110, CPI rises to 3%, real interest rates exceed 2.5%, tech stock sell-offs will break Bitcoin's correlation with US stocks—triggering a "digital gold" narrative shift.
Brent is now $102. Just $8 away from $110.
And as traditional stores of value are eroded by persistent inflation, BTC with absolutely limited supply will gain new allocation demand.
The energy price baseline is moving up, a mid-to-long-term trend.
OPEC+ is not inactive.
They are waiting for the best moment to act.
The G7 is buying time with inventories. OPEC+ is exchanging time for pricing power.
On the negotiation table between Iran and the US is not peace, but the switch controlling one-fifth of global oil.
November 1, OPEC+'s next meeting.
Before then, the effect of the G7's release will become clearer. If oil prices are not suppressed—the cards in OPEC+'s hands become a royal flush.
What you need to do now is not guess who will win.
It's to see clearly the bottom cards of this game and decide which side you stand on.
The G7 has released 325 million barrels. Oil prices remain around $100. Inventories are the lowest since 1983. OPEC+'s spare capacity is only 1.09 million barrels per day.
This is not a supply crisis. This is a carefully designed standoff.
OPEC+ is watching how long the G7 can hold out. $BTC$CL$BZ#中东能源航运风险升温，两大关键海峡受扰
Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more
