Post

colword.std
colword.std
Show original
风险账:夏普差出一倍,波动算平手 年化波动率 $BTC 20.3% 对 $ETH 19.2%,差一个多点,基本平手,俩都不是省油的灯,插针谁也躲不掉。夏普比率 8.76 对 4.73,差出将近一倍:同样担一单位风险,$BTC 挣的钱接近 $ETH 的两倍。这账不用翻,$BTC 的波动换来的是钱,$ETH 的波动换来的是心跳。上期 $ETH 靠 3.10 的夏普赢下 PK,这期 $BTC 用 8.76 把场子找回来,加密圈的稳健人设,保鲜期三天。
colword.std
colword.std
BTC vs ETH Money-Making Ability Comparison, 2026-10-04 | Issue 24, PK Day | Verdict $BTC Scoreboard first This round $BTC wins, no suspense: 7-day window return +2.93% vs $ETH's +1.47%, max drawdown 0.5% vs 1.4%, Sharpe 8.76 vs 4.73, contract OI net inflow 684 million vs 176 million, all four cards stacked in favor. Last issue the scoreboard just voted for $ETH, praising its stability and capital attraction, three days later $BTC's big bullish candle on 10/04 directly overturned the table, what does it mean? It means the tide has turned, the steady image can't be relied on, it still depends on whose wallet is moving. This round $ETH longs are more expensive, the average fee rate 0.0055% is higher than $BTC's 0.0046%, and the key is it hasn't achieved a painless effect: paid more rent but didn't get the meat. Return situation: one big bullish candle decides Over 7 trading days, $BTC rose from 83,624 to 86,079, a +2.93% return, with the big bullish candle on 10/04 contributing more than half; $ETH during the same period moved from 2,677 to 2,716, +1.47%, all accumulated by small steps.

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!