Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC Daily outlook & trade update Today gets interesting. My HTF primary expectation remains a corrective leg, and even in bull markets that can mean 20–30%. But I’m not forcing it - we still have to trade what price actually gives us. My swing short got stopped at entry with roughly half the profits that we locked at 2-3R. I was re-triggered overnight around the .886, but protected it early when waking up because we still have a very clean upside magnet. Above us: > growing liquidity above the $DOGE perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.09284, currently 0.09599, floating profit +169.64%.
The idea is very simple: the bottom consolidates with extremely low volume, volatility is crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have settled. A single volume-increasing bullish candle directly lifts the price from 0.092, a typical start signal, go long, not short. 50x leverage, stop loss at 0.091. The trend moves steadily upward, giving no comfortable entry points.
At this position, I plan to take profit on half of the position first, and move the stop loss of the remaining half up to 0.095 to let profits run. If 0.10 can be broken with volume, continue holding; if it can't hold, exit completely. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $OP perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.13555, currently at 0.14025, floating profit +173.36%.
The logic is simple: repeatedly bottoming around 0.135, each dip is quickly recovered, the wicks get shorter and shorter, and selling pressure clearly weakens. Once volume picks up and it breaks above 0.138, confirmed on the right side, enter more longs. 50x leverage, stop loss at 0.133. The rally is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Now move the stop loss to 0.138 to lock in profits. If volume breaks above 0.145, can hold for more. $SNDK $HYPE #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 10.6 Morning session, Sister San's strategy.
"BTC: First lock in, then wait for a shakeout"
The bull market has started, but the recovery phase won't see the monthly candle rise continuously without any pullback. Usually, a shakeout is needed midway to flush out short-term chips.
The range from 86500 to 93000 is where the chips are most densely concentrated in this upward move. I consider the first pullback a window worth entering. There are four reasons: the price has risen sufficiently, too many consecutive monthly bullish candles, concentrated selling pressure in this area, and active buying is starting to weaken.
Based on this, I plan to first do a lock-in defense. If the price falls to around 79000, I will release the lock and add profits back to the long position; if the price doesn't fall but rises instead, I will look to add short lock positions between 86500 and 90500. Once the monthly or larger cycle candle effectively stands above 93000, the lock ends, and I accept smaller profits.
Core idea: Don't bet on a one-sided move, first use locked positions to control risk, and wait for the market to give its own answer through a shakeout or breakout. $BTC
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
#贝森特：美债收益率上升符合全球趋势
#波动雷达：币种异动观察 It's important to note that BTC is currently consolidating strongly around $85,700. The next key resistance level is in the $86,600-$87,570 range. This area not only represents a dense selling pressure zone from recent pullbacks but is also a crucial level for the opening price of 2026. If the bulls break through this range with significant volume and hold above $87,400-$87,500 on the daily chart, the market will activate an ascending triangle pattern, opening a channel for an upward move toward$DOGE Damn it! The DOGE pumpers are playing wash trading around 0.096 again, jumping up and down like they're having a fit, and the retail investors have long been thrown off the bus.💡
Looking at the chart, funds are repeatedly rubbing at this position, with volume shrinking to a needle-like thinness. It's obviously a game of mutual insults among the pumpers. No news, purely technical battle. I've been watching the 0.096 level for a while; the bottom at 0.092 is solid, and the first target above is 0.105.
I'm planning to secretly lay an ambush around 0.096, with a stop loss at 0.091. If it breaks, I'll admit defeat. Don't chase the highs, wait for a pullback.
If you want to follow, check the market card below to see the order book, control your position size, and always set a stop loss.🔥
In this market, do you think the pumpers will push up first or dump first?
👇👇👇Is your TRX address still secure? TRON's quantum-resistant upgrade is entering the countdown, with only one step left before the mainnet launch
The risk of key cracking brought by quantum computing is becoming a long-term security challenge that major public blockchains must face. TRON's quantum-resistant solution has been implemented on the Nile testnet, and only governance voting remains before mainnet deployment, marking the upgrade countdown.
TRON adopts two NIST-standard post-quantum signature algorithms: Falcon-512 and ML-DSA-44. The old and new cryptographic systems run in parallel and are compatible; the original ECDSA signatures are retained, and new post-quantum signature schemes are added. Users are not required to forcibly migrate addresses or change private keys; old and new addresses can coexist, allowing users to choose whether to enable quantum-resistant protection.
The upgrade covers all scenarios including transaction signatures, super representative block production, node communication, and contract signature verification. If future quantum computers can break traditional elliptic curve algorithms, post-quantum signatures will safeguard asset security.
Roadmap:
1. Testnet phase: Quantum-resistant signatures have been deployed on the Nile testnet, with developers conducting security tests;
2. Governance voting: Proposal undergoes community voting, and upon approval, mainnet upgrade proceeds;
3. Mainnet launch: Full network upgrade planned for completion by the end of 2026.
📌 Objective note:
Currently, the feature is only live on the testnet and not yet activated on the mainnet. The ability of quantum computers to break existing cryptographic systems is a long-term risk, not an immediate threat. The upgrade requires completion of on-chain governance voting and may be delayed.$XRP perpetual 100x long position, opened at 1.486, now at 1.5142, floating profit +189.77%.
Didn't overthink it: the consolidation period was long enough, the 1.48 level was repeatedly confirmed as valid, the bottom pattern is very clear. Entered as soon as a volume-increasing bullish candle appeared, following the trend not the sentiment. 100x leverage, stop loss at 1.47. The rise was fast and steady, giving no chance for a second entry.
Locked in a safety buffer at 1.50 first. My personal judgment is that there will be selling pressure around 1.55, then I'll decide whether to exit or hold based on volume, without guessing the top in advance. $CT $DOGE #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $AKE perpetual 20x short position, opened at 0.03418, currently 0.03079, floating profit +198.36%.
The idea is very straightforward: a top consolidation with volume but stagnant price, volatility crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have loosened. A single high-volume bearish candle smashed the price down from 0.034, a typical breakdown signal, shorting is favored over longing. 20x leverage, stop loss at 0.035. The trend is continuously downward, giving no comfortable exit points.
At this position, I plan to take profit on half of the position first, and move the stop loss of the remaining half up to 0.032 to let profits run. If 0.029 breaks down with volume, continue holding; if it doesn't break, exit fully. $ZEC $SOL #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $BTC
On the 180D liquidation map, a ±10K move from current price would trigger:
• $11.00B in long liquidations
• $3.80B in short liquidations
With nearly 3x more long liquidity stacked below, price will likely at least sweep the larger clusters around 82K and possibly 79K before continuing higher toward 95K+.
Leaving the 87.5K liquidity untouched for now would favour a larger move to the upside after the liquidity hunt.Core chain's quantum-resistant solution: no private key changes, no hard forks, dual-signature fallback—this is the security BTCFi should have
The threat of quantum computing is gradually entering the view of public chain developers. While the Bitcoin community is still theoretically discussing quantum resistance solutions, Core has already proposed a differentiated upgrade approach.
Core adopts a hybrid dual-signature mechanism: each transaction carries two sets of signatures. The original elliptic curve signature is retained, while a post-quantum signature is added.
There is no need to replace users' existing private keys or execute a hard fork; the old and new cryptographic systems run in parallel with mutual fallback.
If quantum computers eventually break the traditional elliptic curve algorithm, the post-quantum signature can take over to ensure asset security; if the new cryptographic algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original signature system can still provide fallback.
Core logic: quantum attacks target not the blockchain ledger but the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Mining power and hashing are difficult to be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process.
The upgrade will be implemented progressively in three phases:
1. Phase one: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Phase two: support hybrid signature transactions, coexistence of old and new addresses, allowing users to choose whether to enable quantum resistance protection;
3. Phase three: gradually promote quantum-resistant addresses and complete network migration. $BTC
On the 180D liquidation map, a ±10K move from current price would trigger:
• $11.00B in long liquidations
• $3.80B in short liquidations
With nearly 3x more long liquidity stacked below, price will likely at least sweep the larger clusters around 82K and possibly 79K before continuing higher toward 95K+.
Leaving the 87.5K liquidity untouched for now would favour a larger move to the upside after the liquidity hunt.$ARB perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.20067, currently 0.21014, floating profit +235.95%.
Just betting on a bottom reversal: 0.20 tested three times without breaking, volume increasing stepwise, very standard bottom characteristics. Enter at the moment the bullish candle pulls up, never guess the bottom prematurely. 50x leverage, stop loss at 0.198. This wave moved very cleanly, almost no pullback.
For now, do nothing, let the bullet fly a while. Set 0.208 as the defense line to protect the principal, wait for a clear signal around 0.22 before deciding to add or not, no rush. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 Short ZEC Day 1: 1300 Support Fails to Change Downtrend
Today is the first day of shorting ZEC. Although there is some support around 1300, breaking below it may just be a matter of time.
ZEC is currently quoted at 1320, with the hourly chart showing a spike to 1368 followed by a rapid decline. After positive news was released, ETF funds shifted from a cumulative net inflow of $98.2 million to the first outflow, causing sentiment to cool quickly. RSI6 is at 39.21, indicating a weak zone; MACD has turned green, showing a clear weakening of bullish momentum; KDJ is diverging downward, indicating obvious short-term pressure. The resistance zone is between 1333-1368, with short-term support at 1300 and key support at 1270.
The market is highly correlated with BTC and ETH. After the news-driven boost fades, elasticity turns negative. The rebound should be viewed primarily as a correction and not a signal to chase longs. The current focus is on whether the 1300 support can hold; if broken, further declines to 1270 or even lower are expected.
From a time perspective, the short position has been held for nearly half the expected duration, and the trend direction has not reversed. The combination of realized positive news, capital outflow, and weakening technical indicators supports the ongoing downtrend logic. However, note that ZEC is volatile; if there is volume-supported buying near 1300, short-term fluctuations may occur, so position management remains key.
Be patient to wait for confirmation of support breakdown; do not rush to add positions or be shaken by short-term rebounds. Stick to the plan and execute it well; leave the rest to time.
Market review, not investment advice
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $BTC
On the 180D liquidation map, a ±10K move from current price would trigger:
• $11.00B in long liquidations
• $3.80B in short liquidations
With nearly 3x more long liquidity stacked below, price will likely at least sweep the larger clusters around 82K and possibly 79K before continuing higher toward 95K+.
Leaving the 87.5K liquidity untouched for now would favour a larger move to the upside after the liquidity hunt.$HYPE perpetual 50x long position, opened at 89.463, now at 94.872, unrealized profit +302.30%.
The idea is very simple: the bottom consolidates with extremely low volume, volatility is crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have settled. A single volume-increasing bullish candle directly pulls the price up from 89, a typical start signal, go long, not short. 50x leverage, stop loss at 88. The trend moves steadily upward, giving no comfortable entry points.
At this position, I plan to take profit on half of the position first, moving the stop loss of the remaining half up to 93 to let profits run. If 98 can be broken with volume, continue holding; if not, close all positions. $CT $SNDK #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $BTC
On the 180D liquidation map, a ±10K move from current price would trigger:
• $11.00B in long liquidations
• $3.80B in short liquidations
With nearly 3x more long liquidity stacked below, price will likely at least sweep the larger clusters around 82K and possibly 79K before continuing higher toward 95K+.
Leaving the 87.5K liquidity untouched for now would favour a larger move to the upside after the liquidity hunt.ETH's one-hour order book is clear-cut, with the bullish trendline repeatedly tested but not broken. The MACD is forming a golden cross above the zero line, indicating that the short-term pullback is not a distribution but a consolidation. The current price is around 2718, with bullish liquidations near 2680 not dense; bears would need extra volume to break through, which is not visible for now. Conversely, there are large bearish liquidations hanging between 2750 and 2780; if the price breaks through this range, it could trigger a chain of forced liquidations, accelerating a short squeeze.
This structure suggests only trading with the trend on pullbacks to go long, not chasing highs. I just parked the car by the roadside and took a sip of water; my phone is heating up from the sun but it doesn't affect my judgment. Entry range is set between 2712 and 2720; if there is a sharp drop to around 2705, an additional entry can be made. Stop loss is unified below 2678; breaking this means the trendline has failed and the position should not be held. Take profit targets are first between 2755 and 2770; if the price moves above 2780 with a volume spike and a long upper shadow, lock in profits and exit immediately without greed for the last leg.
The risk point is strong resistance above 2780, which can easily lure bulls before a quick pullback, so do not max out your position and keep leverage within safe limits. The overall direction is bullish, but only trade the confirmed liquidity segment.
$ETH
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
@OKX星球 shifting from "telling stories" to "buying spot"
Just now, BTC once approached $87,000, hitting a new 8-month high. Weak employment data suppressed US Treasury yields, accelerating market bets on the Federal Reserve's policy shift toward easing.
Institutions are voting with real money. BlackRock IBIT saw a single-day net inflow of $196 million, with a historical total inflow reaching $65.5 billion. Strive last week bought 2,000 BTC at an average price of $84,422, Daily Crypto Talk｜BTC 4H Range Consolidation, Breakout Still Awaiting Volume Confirmation
As of 10-06 06:08 (Beijing Time), Binance Spot BTC/USDT at 85907.16, 24H -0.29%. Daily chart shows range consolidation, 4H chart also consolidating.
Resistance at 86921.07—87077.15, 87317.63—87473.71; Support at 85150.57—85306.65, 84730.07—84886.15.
[Conditional Trading Plan]
Direction: Long; Enter limit order at 85228.6 after confirmation, stop loss at 84730.1, take profit at 86999.1 USDT; planned risk-reward ratio 3.55:1 (excluding fees).
Trigger: After 4H candle closes firmly above MA20 and then retests near 85228, 1H volume must confirm at no less than 0.8 times the average volume of the past 20 bars. After confirmation, only place limit order at this entry price, no chasing price; invalid if stop loss is hit or no execution within 8 hours from data time.
Attached chart includes full indicator analysis. For technical analysis only, not investment advice.BTCFi is the only public chain in the BTCFi sector that has deployed quantum-resistant technology. What is the valuation of the Core chain?
Quantum computing threats are becoming a long-term foundational security issue for public chains. The Bitcoin community is still at the theoretical discussion stage; the BIP quantum-resistant proposal remains a draft and has not yet been implemented in an official roadmap. In contrast, Core, as a public chain in the BTCFi sector, is the first to disclose its quantum-resistant defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously—one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other employing a post-quantum signature algorithm. If future quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signatures, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering dual protection.
The core logic: quantum threats do not attack the ledger itself but target the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining power will not be directly compromised by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. This Core upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid asset theft risks caused by future quantum computers breaking keys.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. First phase: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Second phase: support hybrid signature transactions, allowing old and new addresses to coexist in parallel, enabling users to switch independently;
3. Third phase: gradually promote quantum-resistant addresses to complete the overall network migration. $SAND perpetual 50x short position, opened at 0.07388, currently 0.06881, floating profit +343.12%.
The idea is very simple: a top horizontal consolidation with volume but stagnant price, volatility crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have loosened. A single high-volume bearish candle smashed the price down from 0.073, a typical breakdown signal, shorting is favored over longing. 50x leverage, stop loss at 0.076. The trend is continuously downward, giving no comfortable exit points.
At this position, I plan to take profit on half of the position first, and move the stop loss of the remaining half up to 0.07 to let profits run. If 0.065 is broken down with volume, continue holding; if not, close all positions. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 Currently, I personally believe that Bitcoin $BTC and Ethereum $ETH are more suitable to focus on shorting opportunities, with key levels around $87,000 and $2,800 respectively.
Why am I so firm about this now? 👇
First and foremost, the most important factor is that U.S. Treasury yields remain high!
Even if there is positive news, the market will quickly be suppressed.$BTC, 1M At the moment, price has reclaimed 2Y rVWAP & Two-Year PP 84.1K, and for confirmation we need to see current month close above it. Reclaiming and holding this confluence opens the way toward targets above at R1, R2–R3, where TL is also running Previously, I presented a number of arguments that increased probability that bottom was in 50–60K area, where we had confluence of supports: long-term 7-year TL, VWAP from '22 uptrend, bullish monthly OB and UO signaling oversold conditions. Now$MUBARAK perpetual 20x long position, opened at 0.063765, now at 0.074466, floating profit +335.63%.
The logic is very simple: repeatedly bottoming around 0.063, each dip is quickly recovered, the wicks get shorter and shorter, and selling pressure is clearly exhausted. Wait for a volume breakout above 0.068, confirm on the right side, then add more longs. 20x leverage, stop loss at 0.06. The rally is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Now move the stop loss to 0.072 to lock in profits. If there is a volume breakout above 0.08, you can hold for more. $SNDK $HYPE #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $BTC 📈
Stupid PA continues... price wandering around like me after 10 beers looking for the kebab shop.
Hard to find a good reason for this latest move back above mrVAH, after price lost key support at mrVAH earlier today.
No real intent from perps yet.
No real spot participation yet.
But also no defense from passive sellers, with price simply walking through resistance as shorts keep covering. Quantum Security = BTCFi's Ultimate Narrative? Core Chain's Move Is Huge
The quantum computing threat is becoming a long-term foundational security issue in the crypto community. The Bitcoin community is still at the theoretical discussion stage and has not yet implemented a formal anti-quantum roadmap, while Core is the first to disclose an anti-quantum defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously, one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other equipped with a post-quantum signature algorithm. If future quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signature, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering dual protection.
Core logic: The quantum threat does not attack the ledger itself but targets the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining power will not be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. Core's upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid asset theft risks caused by quantum computers breaking keys in the future.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. Phase one: Add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Phase two: Support hybrid signature transactions, with old and new addresses coexisting in parallel, allowing users to switch independently;
3. Phase three: Gradually promote anti-quantum addresses to complete the overall network migration.
Objective reminder: This is currently only a planned roadmap and has not yet launched on the mainnet. Large-scale commercial use of quantum computers is a long-term event, representing early layout for long-term security infrastructure.$CT perpetual 20x short position, opened at 0.4828, currently 0.3982, floating profit +350.45%.
Didn't overthink it: the previous consolidation lasted long enough, the 0.48 level was repeatedly confirmed as valid, the top pattern is very clear. Entered as soon as a high-volume bearish candle appeared, following the trend not the sentiment. 20x leverage, stop loss at 0.50. The drop was fast and steady, giving no chance for a second entry.
Locked in a safety cushion at 0.42 first. My personal judgment is that there will be support around 0.35; then I'll decide whether to exit or hold based on volume, without guessing the bottom in advance. $SOL $DOGE #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $CORE $CORE $CORE Price weakness ≠ decentralization is just a slogan, don't mix these two things together
In discussions, one viewpoint is very practical: even if the chain cannot be tampered with, when large holders unlock and dump, the price drops and retail investors still lose money; chain security does not equal price security. I fully agree with this.
Price fluctuations are determined by market funds, bull and bear cycles, and the rhythm of chip release. No crypto project can guarantee a continuously rising price, and CORE naturally faces this issue, with the selling pressure risk from large locked positions maturing, which everyone needs to be aware of.
But the core of our discussion—decentralization—is defined as whether a few people can tamper with on-chain transactions or control the entire public chain. This concept has never included "guaranteeing the price won't fall."
Take Bitcoin as an example: price crashes in bear markets and large whales selling are normal, but no one says Bitcoin's decentralization is just a slogan because of price drops.
A quiet ecosystem is a shortcoming CORE currently needs to address, which belongs to the ecosystem construction level; large holders unlocking and dumping is a secondary market trading risk; underlying network decentralization is about the public chain ledger security level. These three are independent and cannot be lumped together.
The ecosystem needs continuous development, market risks cannot be ignored, but the decentralization progress of the underlying network cannot be denied based solely on market performance. Everyone is welcome to discuss rationally. Single Coin Transaction Linkage｜Last 15 Minutes
$CT contract's final segment transactions differ from the entire segment: the entire segment spot/contract active buy-in rates are 89.0%/39.4%; the contract's final segment is 40.2%. The final segment has shifted to nearly balanced buying and selling, so the same-direction or opposite-direction labels for the entire segment do not represent the transaction relationship at the end of the window.CL price has now returned to around $86,400, indicating that there were indeed buyers around the $84,000–$85,000 range earlier, so the money hasn't left. But there's a detail to note: as the price moves up, the contract open interest has reached about 97,761 BTC, and the funding rate has risen to around +0.008%. Simply put, some people have already started betting on a continued rise in advance. $SPCX perpetual 75x long position, opened at 159.02, now at 171.17, floating profit +573.04%.
The idea is very simple: the bottom consolidates with extremely low volume, volatility is crushed to the floor, indicating that the chips have settled. A single volume-increasing bullish candle directly pulls the price up from 159, a typical start signal, go long, not short. 75x leverage, stop loss at 155. The trend is continuously upward, giving no comfortable entry point.
At this position, I plan to first reduce half of the position to take profits, and move the stop loss of the remaining half up to 168 to let profits run. If 180 can be broken with volume and hold, continue holding; if not, exit completely. $ZEC $SOL #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 $ZEC suddenly surged nearly 2% in the early session, making one suspect it might be a short squeeze trap. However, it turned down without even touching the 7-day moving average at 1391, indicating that the resistance above remains. The rebound below the moving average can only be considered a weak recovery, not a trend reversal.
Futures open interest shrank by nearly 20% over the week, with leveraged funds clearly retreating, mainly due to profit-taking by the bulls leading to position reduction. Although the chips have lightened, the bearish structure remains unchanged.
Continue to maintain a bearish outlook, first watching if 1215 can be broken; if the price pulls back up to 1440, then follow the discipline to stop loss.Sometimes you really can't blame the whales for dumping; if I were them, I'd run even faster. 😂
An ancient whale from an ETH ICO, after being silent for 6 months, transferred 13,330 ETH, worth about $36.37 million, to Coinbase.
He bought 170,000 ETH back then at $0.31 each, costing just over $50,000.
How much is it worth now?
$460 million. 😂
I'm not afraid whether this whale sells or not; what I really want to see is:
Can ETH hold up against such a huge profit-taking pressure? Quantum computers will break Bitcoin in 3 years? Core chain has secretly set up this "quantum firewall"
The threat of quantum computing is gradually entering the field of public chain developers. The market has optimistic estimates: quantum computers capable of breaking elliptic curve encryption may be realized in about 3 years at the earliest. The Bitcoin community is still discussing solutions and has not yet launched an official anti-quantum roadmap, while Core has taken the lead in disclosing its anti-quantum defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously, one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other equipped with a post-quantum signature algorithm. If quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signature in the future, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering two-way protection.
The core logic: the quantum threat does not attack the ledger itself, but the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining computing power will not be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. Core's upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid the risk of asset theft caused by quantum computers breaking keys in the future.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. First phase: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Second phase: support hybrid signature transactions, with old and new addresses coexisting in parallel, allowing users to switch independently;
3. Third phase: gradually promote anti-quantum addresses and complete the overall network migration. $FIL perpetual 50x long position, opened at 1.0623, now at 1.1969, floating profit +633.64%.
The logic is very simple: repeatedly bottoming around 1.06, each dip is quickly recovered, the wicks get shorter and shorter, and selling pressure clearly weakens. Wait for a volume breakout above 1.10, confirm on the right side, then go long. 50x leverage, stop loss at 1.05. The rally is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Now move the stop loss to 1.18 to lock in profits. If volume breaks above 1.25, you can hold on for more. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 ARB surged onto CoinGecko's trending list, but the price only rose by 3.4%
ARB surged onto CoinGecko's trending list, but the price only increased by +3.4% — $ARB current price is 0.21, the hype hasn't turned into money yet. No detours in direction: I am bullish at this position.
Daily RSI is 57.3, moderately strong but not overbought; short-term moving averages are in a bullish alignment, MA7 is above MA30; funding rate is 0.0001 near zero, leverage hasn't ignited, this move is driven by spot buying alone. The only flaw is OI down -3.86%, contract positions are withdrawing — for the hype to turn into real gains, spot volume must take over, but 24h trading volume is 15,465,533 USDT, volume ratio 0.424 is still shrinking, so trade position for safety, not enthusiasm for catching the dip.
Resistance above: 0.2111
Support below: 0.1952
Fear and Greed Index at 70, sentiment leans greedy, market phase judged as offensive, risk preference is risk_on. Execution path is straightforward: enter directly at current price 0.21, cut losses if it breaks below 0.1952; hold if a strong volume surge candle closes above 0.2111 for extension. Entry and stop-loss levels are fixed in advance, no last-minute changes.
Follow me, so you won't get lost in the next market move.
$ARB $BTCNo operation, no analysis, just relying on luck; I feel embarrassed even to share this record. While everyone else was still watching, $SHAZ was under high-level pressure, volume didn't keep up, and sell orders piled up layer after layer above. I directly warned not to chase SHAZ, and short positions could look for a pullback.
Just after lunch when I checked the market, it was still oscillating repeatedly, with each rebound weaker than the last, insufficient support, heavy signs of a bull trap. The short positions around 48.77 were taken with peace of mind.
Now 48.07 is right in front of us, with a return of +15.58%. Those on board should be waking up smiling. Pocket the big gains first, close 80% of the position, keep the remaining 20% at cost price as protection. If it continues to drop, let the profits run; if it rebounds, don't give back what you've gained.
The premise of compounding is survival; the shortcut to getting rich quick often leads to zero.
Hold on if the trend is intact; run if it breaks. Don't fall in love with stocks.
For friends who haven't gotten on board yet, listen to me: the market is not short of opportunities, but it lacks patience. Wait for a more comfortable position in the next round, and I will notify you immediately.
$BTC $SNDK BTC is not panicking yet, Core chain takes the lead: Quantum-resistant upgrade roadmap revealed for the first time
The threat of quantum computing is gradually entering the field of public chain developers. The Bitcoin community is still continuously discussing quantum-resistant solutions and has not yet finalized an official roadmap, while Core has taken the lead in disclosing its quantum-resistant defense upgrade plan.
Core adopts a hybrid signature scheme: each transaction carries two sets of signatures simultaneously, one using the existing classical cryptographic algorithm, and the other using a post-quantum signature algorithm. If future quantum computers break the traditional elliptic curve signature, the post-quantum signature can take over asset security; if the new algorithm has vulnerabilities, the original cryptographic system can still provide a fallback, offering dual protection.
The core logic: the quantum threat does not attack the ledger itself, but the transaction signatures corresponding to users' private keys. Hashing and mining power will not be directly broken by quantum technology; the risk is concentrated in the signature verification process. This Core upgrade aims to reinforce the signature layer in advance to avoid asset theft risks caused by future quantum computers breaking keys.
This is not a one-time hard fork transformation but a phased implementation:
1. First phase: add post-quantum cryptography precompiled contracts to the underlying protocol for developers to test first;
2. Second phase: support hybrid signature transactions, with old and new addresses coexisting in parallel, allowing users to switch independently;
3. Third phase: gradually promote quantum-resistant addresses to complete the overall network migration. It is worth noting: this is currently only a planned roadmap and has not yet been launched on the mainnet. Large-scale commercial use of quantum computers is still a long-term event; this is a proactive measure 87000 is just the first level? The next target for Bitcoin is 89500
$BTC has recently been oscillating in a small range, but the lows are gradually rising, with support moving up to around 83700. The downward space is getting narrower and narrower, showing strong signs of sideways movement instead of a drop.
The weekly candle closed with a small bullish candle, and after the daily MACD death cross, the fast and slow lines are tangled without diverging downward; instead, a golden cross could happen at any time. The 4-hour chart already shows a golden cross above the water line.
Currently stuck at the 87000 resistance level, but the willingness to fall is weak—if it should fall, it hasn't yet, so watch for a potential upward breakout. 87000 is very likely to be taken out, and the previous head and shoulders neckline has moved up to 89500, which is the major resistance.
Most short positions in the market are placed between 89000 and 90000. If 89500 breaks, it is very likely to continue sweeping liquidity above, with a spike reaching 91000 or even 92000.
$BTC $ETH $SOL87000 is not the target; it's where others place their orders
$BTC is currently stuck below 87000.
$ETH is fluctuating around 2700, and $ZEC is holding at 1300.
What does this price level mean:
87000 is not a randomly drawn line.
The order density is highest at the round number threshold; every surge is pushed back immediately.
Who is placing orders here:
Sell orders were placed early, waiting for the buying volume chasing in.
Before a breakout, repeated attempts are normal.
Looking further down, a breakout requires more than just sentiment.
It needs real volume and actual money to push it up.
Without volume, multiple surges are futile.
Wait for a volume spike closing above 87000 before discussing direction.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
#VanEck：比特币或继续扩大市场份额 #Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 $BTC $ETH #Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元，真正火起来的可能不只是SOL.
An important data point has emerged: In September, the trading volume of tokenized stocks on the Solana chain reached $4.4 billion, setting a new monthly record. Platforms like Raydium and Orca have become the main trading venues.
What does this mean?
In the past, when people mentioned Solana, they mostly thought of MEME, DeFi, and high-frequency on-chain trading.
But now, more and more traditional stocks are being moved onto the chain.
Stocks can be traded 24/7, and settlement can also be completed directly on-chain. Recently, U.S. regulators have provided clearer policy space for tokenized stock trading.
So the significance of this $4.4 billion is not just a new trading volume high.
It’s more like a signal:
Solana is moving from being a "crypto asset trading chain" toward becoming an "infrastructure for traditional asset tokenization."
If RWA continues to expand, what’s truly worth watching for SOL is not just the coin price, but how much real assets and real transactions the chain can actually support.
What the market needs to verify next might be:
Is $4.4 billion just a temporary hype, or the starting point for Solana’s next growth phase?
#Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元 $SOL If BAL can enable nodes to prefetch state, its greatest value might be in reducing tail latency.
When discussing block-level access lists, people often focus on average execution speed, but what nodes really fear are the few extremely slow blocks. Irregular database access, cache misses, or contracts touching a large amount of scattered state can all prolong validation time. BAL exposes the accounts and storage keys a block will access in advance to the execution client, allowing nodes to prefetch data before actual execution, reducing the waiting time caused by searching around the disk temporarily.
This does not mean every block will speed up by the same margin. When the state is already in memory, the benefit of prefetching may be minimal; when the list is larger or network transmission is slower, it may even add extra overhead. What really matters to measure is tail latency: under high load, weaker hardware, and different database configurations, whether the slowest batch of blocks can more easily complete validation within the time limit. A nice average but frequent timeouts on extreme samples will still cause the network to favor high-end nodes.
For the long-term value of $ETH, a stable validation window is more important than advertised peak performance. As long as home nodes can continue to independently verify blocks after throughput increases, scaling does not sacrifice the breadth of validators. BAL is not a new feature users can directly click on, but it may determine whether higher capacity is ultimately validated by more people together or barely sustained by a few infrastructure providers.🔷 5 reasons for the $BTC rally and 5 against
FOR growth:
Probability of Fed rate hike <20%
ETFs attracted $2.4B in 5 days
Crypto market is small, inflows have strong impact
Open interest -20%, fewer liquidations
October historically: +17-20%
AGAINST growth:
Bonds >5%, rate is high
Brent $105, fueling inflation
Supply zone $83-86K
Classic cycle: ATH was in October 2025
ETF demand is unstable, volumes are low
🧠 Main question: have ETFs broken the old cycle model?
❓ Have ETFs broken the cycle model?👇I was really stunned for a few seconds when I just saw Kalshi's new round of financing valuation.
$40 billion.
Last December, its valuation was only $11 billion, it rose to $22 billion in March this year, and now the latest round is talking about $40 billion, almost doubling again in about half a year. Even more outrageous, Polymarket on the other side is also raising funds at a valuation of about $21 billion.
I used to think prediction markets were still a rather niche play in the crypto world, where people bet on elections, interest rates, sports games — fun but still far from a real big business.
But now the data is a bit different.
By August this year, Kalshi's cumulative trading volume has exceeded $40 billion, expanding nearly 4 times in half a year; Bloomberg disclosed materials showing its annualized revenue run rate was already close to $4 billion, with a gross margin of about 90%.
What's more interesting is that it is no longer satisfied with just competing with Polymarket on "who predicts more accurately," but wants to move toward a bigger exchange direction, even traditional exchanges like CME and ICE are being used as benchmarks.
I finally somewhat understand why Hyperliquid has recently started doing Outcome Market as well.
This track is no longer just "crypto people casually betting a few rounds." At this point, the account has directly dropped to 10.11U, and today I lost 12% in one go; my mindset has been completely worn down by ETH.
$ETH's trend is really frustrating. While BTC keeps surging repeatedly, it’s stuck oscillating between 2680 and 2740, totally out of sync. Several times it tried to break up, touching 2749 before being slammed back down. The bulls have no strength, the bears can’t push it down deeply, so it just stubbornly moves sideways, draining patience.
All the market funds are piling into BTC; Ethereum isn’t getting any incremental capital support, so it can only passively fluctuate following BTC. The Fed meeting minutes are about to be released, and everyone is watching cautiously; no one wants to take the initiative to push the market now.
The bulls are hoping for a breakout above 2750 to open up upward space, while the bears are waiting for a drop below 2680 to start a pullback. Both sides are just enduring. This kind of choppy market is the most torturous, sweeping stop losses back and forth. No matter long or short, holding for a bit too long means getting hit.
Only after losing did I realize: when BTC is strong, don’t stubbornly fight the number two. Until rotation happens, no matter how much you hold on, it’s hard to see a big move.
Follow your big bro here, those who understand will understand.
#ETHSidewaysChurnsPatience
#FundsPileIntoBTCEthereumLags
#WaitingForFedMinutesToBreakRangeIn the past couple of days, I saw the NEAR Intents situation, and my first reaction was: Isn't this storyline a bit too crypto-world?
Just a moment ago, everyone was praising it.
During the Bitget hack fund flow, the $NEAR Intents related system was discussed because it intercepted abnormal funds. But just a few days later, on October 1st, it had its own security incident, with preliminary losses of about 3.8 million USD.
The problem was in the interaction between Omni's deposit and withdrawal infrastructure and the NEAR Intents smart contract, not the NEAR mainnet itself being breached. After the incident, services were directly suspended, and deposits and withdrawals on 11 chains including BSC, Polygon, and Optimism were affected for a time. The team also promised full compensation for user losses.
The most dramatic part came afterward.
On-chain tracking showed the hacker transferred some funds to KuCoin, then converted them to $BTC; Aurora co-founder Alex Shevchenko then publicly called out, saying the attacker’s identity was confirmed and gave 48 hours to return the money.
Then the even more unbelievable happened: by October 2nd, CoinDesk updated that the attacker had returned all the stolen assets.
So now when I read on-chain security news, my mindset has changed.
Before, seeing “hacker stole 3.8 million”:
It’s over, another one lost.
Now:
Hold on, wait two days to see if it turns into “Bro, your money’s back, don’t report it”😭MetaMask took an action these past couple of days, and when I first saw it, I thought the data was wrong.
Nearly 17,000 $ETH $ETH validators suddenly started exiting.
On-chain statistics show that about 16,965 validators have exited or are in the queue to exit.
Seeing such a large exit volume normally, the first reaction would definitely be:
Who’s selling? 😭
But MetaMask came out to explain.
On September 30, they discovered a security incident in some of their infrastructure, so they proactively initiated validator exits as a precautionary measure. So far, no direct threat to the MetaMask wallet itself has been found.
I find this quite interesting.
Previously, when I saw ETH validator exit queues, I usually thought about the market: whether stakers were preparing to cash out, or if there would be a new wave of potential sell pressure.
But this time, so many exited at once, and the reason behind it was security risk control.
It also reminded me of something:
In the future, when we see sudden changes in staking data, we really can’t just look at "how much ETH is about to come out."
We also need to see who is exiting and why.
Because 17,000 validators represent a considerable scale, but "proactively withdrawing nodes to avoid risk" and "validators preparing to sell coins" are completely different things.
Currently, MetaMask has not found any direct risk to wallets, so I won’t interpret this as a huge ETH sell-off signal for now.
I’m more inclined to wait for them to fully review the September 30 incident.
After all, for MetaMask to withdraw nearly 17,000 validators at once...
This scale of "just a precaution" is indeed quite large 😭
For personal organization only, not investment advice, DYOR.CORE Hard Fork: Review of the Node Reward Vulnerability Incident
Core DAO announced it is coordinating an urgent hard fork to fix a vulnerability that allowed some validator nodes to receive CORE rewards exceeding the protocol's preset amount. Core stated that the vulnerability has been effectively contained, and "malicious validator nodes" can no longer obtain excess rewards; this fork is a forward upgrade and will not roll back the network or revoke any previously confirmed transactions, ensuring the safety of ordinary users' assets.
Due to this incident, several centralized exchanges have restricted deposits and withdrawals of the CORE token. At the early stage of the event, Core DAO had not disclosed the exact amount of excess issuance, details of the vulnerability, or whether new tokens had entered the secondary market, but promised to release a complete technical review report later.
Additional follow-up: The review revealed that this vulnerability caused 255 million CORE to be prematurely released, with 186 million reclaimed on-chain through the hard fork, leaving about 69 million already flowed out from the reward addresses. This incident only involved the early release of future rewards and did not exceed the total supply cap of 2.1 billion. This leftover supply is a medium- to long-term risk that requires ongoing attention.
#CORE #BTCFi #HardForkAztec recently made a big move by relaunching the privacy wallet zk.money that was discontinued three years ago.
First, let's explain what this wallet actually is.
zk.money is a self-custody private payment wallet. The mechanism works like this:
You create a name for yourself, for example bob.zk.money, and ENS points this name to a deposit address. Others can send you USDC, USDT, or DAI directly from exchanges or Ethereum wallets. Deposits and withdrawals are public on Ethereum, but what happens in between is not visible to outsiders. Names are first-come, first-served, and each deposit address can only be used once. This rule is specifically designed by the official team to prevent multiple deposits from being linked.
There are several hard constraints you must know:
Each deposit, payment, or withdrawal cannot exceed $2500. All users share a daily deposit limit of $50,000. Deposits incur a 35-cent fee, withdrawals a 20-cent fee, and each user is sponsored for 100 transactions per day. The wallet only holds DAI; if you send in USDC or USDT, it will automatically convert to DAI.
It is important to note that the old zk.money is not the same as this one. The old version was a private DeFi app on Aztec Connect, which stopped accepting deposits in 2023 and officially shut down in March 2024. The official statement is very clear: same name, but new product, new architecture, and accounts and funds are not migrated.
$AZTEC