Orbit Post Sitemap
$MUBARAK Looking at MUBARAK's 15-minute chart, I can only say that this kind of coin can really only be profited from by lucky players.
It dips a bit, and you think the bears are finally making a move, just as you want to short, the main force reverses with a big bullish candle and shorts get squeezed out.
When you think it's stable and chase in, it dumps again, then pumps explosively again.
From 0.042 to 0.086, it jumps back and forth, playing people like fools.
Want to make money in this kind of market? Unless you're lucky enough to bottom pick exactly at the moment the whales dump, and escape the top a millisecond before the explosive pump.
If you're even a little greedy or hesitate for a second, profits instantly retract or even turn into losses.
Ordinary players entering are purely fueling the whales.
I admit I don't have the fate to get rich like this, nor do I want to gamble with such heart-pounding moves.
You pump all you want, I'll keep drinking tea and watching the show. As long as I don't sit at the table, you can't cut me.In a bull market, you definitely look at the price increase, but what do you watch during bull and bear rotations?
(This post is mainly aimed at popularizing some lesser-known knowledge!)
Recently, I've actually been looking at a very old-fashioned indicator: daily transaction fees.
On the sixth day after Arc launched, the fees had already dropped to about $9,218; SUI was about $11,500 in the same period.
When the numbers are close (but the underlying factors are completely different):
1. Arc is a financial L1, paying gas directly with USDC, focusing on payments, settlements, and financial markets.
2. SUI already has DeFi, trading, stablecoins, and a BTC ecosystem, and recently went through a cycle due to financial product expectations. (It’s already well established)
3. Looking further, Robinhood Chain is about 312,000, Base about 139,000, Arbitrum about 22,300; transaction fees are essentially a real health check of on-chain usage. (No argument there)
4. So for these public chains, I pay attention to whether they get rotated into later. If the bull market continues, watch for new funds and new applications; if bull and bear rotate, real usage becomes even more important.
Privacy coins have privacy demands, AI coins have AI expectations, MEME relies on sentiment.
(Each type is different)
But in the end, public chains still depend on
whether, after the hype fades, there are still people doing business on them.
$SUI $HOOD $xHOOD #新手必看：这里有你需要的一切 #波动雷达：币种异动观察 ZEC Quick Review: 25x in One Year, Can the King of Privacy Coins Still Be Chased? #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元
ZEC is currently priced around 1530, with a market cap of about 26 billion USD, having surged to 9th place among all cryptocurrencies. September saw continuous breakthroughs: 9/4 surpassed 1000, 9/16 surpassed 1300, and last night peaked at 1568, rising about 25 times in one year.
Three driving forces: ① NU7 upgrade passed with high votes, block time cut from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, speeding up private transfers; ② Community voted 98.9% to retain Bitcoin-style halving, branded as a "better Bitcoin"; ③ Grayscale ZEC spot ETF scale exceeded 400 million USD, a short squeeze piling up with capital inflows.
But here’s a cold shower: +188% in one month, last night’s 1568 peak stalled with serious short-term overbuying. Resistance at 1568, 1800; support at 1468, 1300. Chasing longs at this level is like carrying a coffin; better to wait for a pullback to 1300–1400, and don’t stubbornly hold if it breaks 1468. Privacy coins have high volatility and fast swings.
$BTC $ZEC $ETH The above are personal market notes and do not constitute investment advice; use proper stop-loss on contracts. #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 A few days ago, I predicted that the strongest memes would be bome and mu, but I didn't expect mu to be much stronger. I recommend everyone trading contracts to compare historical prices across multiple platforms. In fact, because OKX is very responsible and cautious about listing contracts, most token contracts go live relatively late. If you only look at the contract prices on OKEx, you might fall into an empiricism trap, mistakenly thinking OKX's historical price is the token's highest price.
However, if you compare multiple platforms, you'll find that the token's highest price reached 0.22, and the next resistance level is at 0.14. This means as long as market funds are abundant and speculation and hype continue to rise, this coin still has room to double. Recently, many dead altcoins in the market have surged 4 to 5 times, even tenfold. So really, never short based on emotion; pay attention to different platforms to avoid hanging yourself on a single tree!
$MUBARAK $ETH $BTC A candlestick that surged 46% in 24 hours, would you still dare to chase?
The answer lies in the numbers: $CHR current price 0.02542, has risen above the Bollinger upper band at 0.02333, RSI as high as 93.1, which is a textbook overbought zone; the funding rate +0.0024% is not extreme, but the fear and greed index at 78 indicates extreme greed, meaning bullish sentiment is fully priced in. My judgment is: the direction is still bullish, but absolutely do not chase at this level, only buy on pullbacks.
There are three reasons: first, MA5=0.02167 is significantly higher than MA20=0.01876, the moving averages are in a bullish alignment and intact, the trend structure is complete; second, MACD histogram +0.00079 is still positive, momentum has not weakened; third, the amplitude of the last 30 candlesticks is about 36.49%, volatility is high, heavy positions now mean leaving stop-loss to luck.
In terms of operation, entry reference range is 0.0233 to 0.0242, that is the Bollinger upper band and the pullback confirmation zone of the previous dense trading area; take profit 1 target is 0.0278, corresponding to the measured extension after breakout; take profit 2 target is 0.0305, a round number resistance and emotional climax; stop loss is set at 0.0215, breaking below MA5 and losing the Bollinger upper band means this rally has been falsified.
Worst case scenario: if RSI quickly falls from 93 accompanied by funding rate turning negative, price may directly retrace to around 0.0188 near MA20, at which point you must exit unconditionally, do not expect a second rally.#ZEC38KShortClosed A $35M loss might not tell the whole story
A Garrett Jin-linked wallet closed its entire ~38K ZEC short, helping ZEC climb ~2.7% during the unwind. But here's what caught my attention: it reportedly kept ~202K ZEC spot.
That suggests the short may have been partly a hedge, not simply a failed bearish bet.
With NU7 approaching and funding still elevated, ZEC's next battle may be less bulls vs bears and more leverage vs fundamentals.
$ZEC
#BTC87KCryptoCap3T 🚨 $BTC & $ETH | Huge options expiry coming this Friday, volatility may heat up again!
This Friday, the crypto market will see a large-scale concentrated expiry of BTC and ETH options, with a notional value of about $19.6 billion.📊
The market's current focus on the "max pain" zones has shifted:
🟠 $BTC max pain: around $82,000 🔵 $ETH max pain: around $2,600
Options expiry does not necessarily mean the price will move toward the max pain point, but as many contracts approach settlement, market makers' hedging, Gamma exposure, and short-term capital rebalancing could all amplify intraday volatility.
If BTC continues to hold $84K–$85K, market focus may shift back to the $88K–$90K range.
For ETH, attention should be paid to the $2.70K–$2.75K support; if capital continues to rotate into ETH, the upper range to watch is $2.85K–$2.90K.
⚠️ Around the expiry date, don’t just focus on the "max pain": price + volume + OI + ETF capital flow together better indicate whether this volatility is a short squeeze or a continuation of a new trend.
#BTC #ETH #Bitcoin #Ethereum #CryptoOptions #CryptoMarket #DailyOrbit $CHR current price 0.02557, 24h surge 47.04%, trading volume only 5.5M USDT; MA5=0.02171 has crossed above MA20=0.0187665, MACD histogram +0.0008071 maintains bullishness, but RSI=93.3 is deeply overbought, price 0.02557 has broken above the Bollinger upper band 0.0234012, funding rate +0.0021%, fear and greed index 78 extremely greedy.
Presenting the data first before making a judgment: this is a typical "moving average bullish + indicator overheating" structure. Here's a reusable method for market analysis—use moving average alignment to assess trend health, focusing on three key points: first, the divergence rate between MA5 and MA20, currently (0.02171-0.0187665)/0.0187665≈15.7%, the short-term moving average is far from the mid-term moving average, indicating a rapid rally with no chip rotation; second, the relationship between price and the Bollinger upper band, closing outside the band means volatility is instantly maxed out, historically chasing longs at this position has a very poor risk-reward ratio; third, RSI and funding rate rise synchronously, RSI at 93.3 combined with positive funding rate indicates crowded longs and rising leverage costs. The trend direction remains upward, but the rhythm has entered a "no chasing highs, only waiting for pullbacks" phase. A while ago, I went grocery shopping with my wife.
At checkout, the guy in front was glued to his phone.
I glanced over.
His screen was full of red and green.
He said this thing is better than working.
I told him not to mess around.
But when I got home, I secretly downloaded an app.
I stared at $BTC for a long time.
Too expensive.
Didn't dare to touch it.
Later, I bought some $ETH.
Right after buying, I regretted it.
When it rose, I thought I bought too little.
When it fell, I thought I bought too much.
Those days, I couldn't put my phone down.
Even while washing dishes, I was checking the market.
Then someone in the group shouted $SOL.
I followed in again.
It just went sideways.
Sideways enough to make me want to scratch the walls.
I cut losses and it surged up.
I chased it and it dropped again.
The fees could have paid for two meals of braised chicken.
After months of tossing and turning,
I didn't make money,
but I definitely lost sleep.
Now I've figured it out.
It's not that you can't touch this stuff,
but don't use money you urgently need.
Don't borrow money.
Don't use leverage.
Don't throw your rent in.
Now I only put in a little bit.
If I lose, it doesn't affect my meals.
If I win, I treat myself to a chicken leg.
I don't envy others' profits.
I don't laugh at others' liquidations.
Who knows what the market will do tomorrow?
If you can hold, hold.
If you can't, buy less.
Controlling your hands is better than anything else.#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布
#AMD市值突破1万亿美元，芯片股集体大涨 Institutions have acted again, but the rhythm and structure have changed. After two weeks of silence, Strategy repurchased 950 BTC at a cost of about 79,670, raising its total inventory to 846,000 BTC. Strive increased its holdings by 1,355 BTC, reaching a position of 26,355 BTC. Regarding ETH, BitMine added 27,562 ETH in a single purchase, with total holdings approaching 5.98 million ETH, of which 5.07 million ETH have been staked to generate yield.
$BTC $ETH
Looking solely at purchase volume, it is difficult to judge the overall trend, and a single company cannot easily influence the market. The core issue is whether the treasury funds of listed companies can synergize with ETFs. If both sides continue to absorb spot assets, circulating chips will be gradually locked up, with limited short-term impact but continuous liquidity withdrawal in the long term.
Concerns also exist. After prices rise, can institutional buying power continue? Strategy only bought 950 BTC this time, a clear slowdown compared to several thousand BTC last month. Although BitMine continues to increase holdings, its logic leans toward staking arbitrage rather than pure bullish hoarding.
As the market just shows signs of improvement, watching more and acting less is better than blind betting. How long can institutional buying support the market?
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 $XRP XRP is the core support of this bull market cycle, mainly driven by institutional incremental expectations, whale lock-ups, and regulatory turning points. The spot XRP ETF has already seen over a billion dollars in net inflows, with leading institutions like Franklin participating. If the CLARITY Act is passed, the market expects it to bring tens of billions in new capital.
On-chain data shows whales continuously withdrawing from exchanges, exchange reserves declining, and circulating supply contracting. Ripple's custody unlocking schedule is relatively transparent, allowing for advance prediction of selling pressure and reducing black swan risks.
At the same time, the XRPL ecosystem continues to expand, with growth in RWA asset scale, gradual rollout of the RLUSD stablecoin, and strengthening narratives around institutional cross-border settlements and tokenized assets. Compared to historical highs, there is still a significant discount, leaving room for bullish speculation.
However, key weaknesses cannot be ignored: XRP's on-chain fees are extremely low, the ecosystem growth and XRP's essential buy demand are weakly linked, and RLUSD expansion does not forcibly consume XRP. If the legislation faces obstacles, these expectations could quickly fade, as this is expectation-driven rather than driven by strong deflationary fundamentals.$XAU dropped to $4,340 and $PEPE fell 3%+, while the whole market turned red. Yet $ZEC went from $1,443 to $1,534 against the trend.
Grayscale’s ETF absorbed $70M in two weeks, NU7 added the halving mechanism, and Paradigm backed it. Privacy coins are up 90% in a month.
My $ZEC short from $822 has been getting crushed for nearly a month. Market dumps, you rise. Market pumps, you rise harder.
Fine. Keep going. Take it to $3,000 and wipe me out.#BTC87KCryptoCap3T $AR (Arweave decentralized storage asset) initially attracted attention due to the AI data storage narrative, with relatively concentrated holdings. The order book shows 2.138 long and 4.361 current, price movement 104% → 20x floating profit 2079.51%.
The price chart shows a sharp rise in the early stage followed by a mid-to-late stage oscillating upward trend, characterized by a low position (2.1 bottoming) + perpetual (OKX/Gate/Bybit 20x) short squeeze resonance. On-chain: moderate circulation ratio, limited total supply, FDV close to MC, initial liquidity relatively shallow, holdings relatively concentrated.
At 20x leverage, a pullback of 4.3% (around 4.17 liquidation) is expected, with an actual tolerance of about 3.8% (including fees); the current 4.361 is close to 4.3-4.5 resistance, holding above this level targets 4.8, failure to hold returns to 4.0, breaking the 2.138 start level signals weakness. $SOL $ZEC #BTC冲高$87000, total crypto market cap returns to 3 trillion $BTC | It's more suitable to wait here rather than chase
Currently, I see two main scenarios:
① This is just a range deviation, and in the coming weeks, the price will retrace this rally, possibly even retesting the previous low near 74K. If the weekly candle continues to hold above the previous high zone, the probability of this scenario will significantly decrease.
② A new consolidation range forms above 80K, and after several months of consolidation, it will look for the next upward move.
At present, the second structure is becoming more worthy of attention, and if more weekly candles stabilize above the previous range highs, this judgment will be further strengthened.
Therefore, at the current position, I prefer to wait for a pullback opportunity in the green zone rather than directly chasing a Long.
The larger cycle structure has already changed, and the current approach remains focused on observing bullish opportunities in line with the trend.Tired, getting ready to sleep, brothers!
I don't want to look at this $AKE anymore, it just won't drop, it's really too wild. The current price is 0.053 and it's drawing a bottom line again. Looks like it's going to either fly or spike again. Opening a short on this coin is too painful.
And after experiencing this coin, I really realized that $LAB and $BEAT aren't that wild after all, because lab pulled up to around 20 and then consolidated for a while before dropping, beat was similar, around 11 with little fluctuation before falling. But this $AKE is consolidating at such a high level and can still go higher, even several times higher!$BTC The market in the latter half of the night actually looks a bit risky from the indicators, with repeated volume contraction and resistance near the daily open. The willingness to sell spot is relatively strong, and the Coinbase premium index is also all in the red.
I've already fully locked the position, hoping it won't be sold off prematurely. Third brother used a real trading screenshot to tell everyone: The bull is back, the bull is really back, this time the bull's hooves are stepping on its own face!!!
BTC directly surged above 86300, ETH also pushed up to 2700, but ZEC showed no mercy, going against the trend with a nearly 1.8% drop, plunging to 1472. The market looks like a fight, but the script was written long ago.
BTC and ETH are following the dual main themes of "compliance + yield generation." BTC attracts funds daily through spot ETFs, with listed companies' treasuries acting like Pixiu, only accumulating and not releasing, plus a surge in short-term US Treasury issuance, the market is betting on liquidity easing again. ETH is even fiercer, with BlackRock and Fidelity pushing staking ETFs, on-chain staking and DeFi yields becoming new selling points; investors are buying "assets that can lay eggs."
ZEC is lagging for one reason: profit-taking pressure. It has already multiplied 25 times, mostly short-term traders on board, and when the market shakes, they run faster than anyone.
My view: This wave is not an emotional bull run, but capital selecting "compliant, yielding, and genuinely demanded" targets. BTC holding 86000 and ETH holding 2700 won’t collapse in the short term; ZEC’s volatility is too wild, don’t rush to catch the falling knife, wait until it grinds out a bottom around 1400.
Strategy: Hold BTC and ETH spot positions tightly, wait for ZEC to stabilize. Don’t chase highs, the indicators are already hot.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 The market surged dramatically, and Brother Maji once again went all-in.
$BTC 40x full position long, 342 coins, opened at 83270, unrealized profit of 930,000 U;
$ETH 25x full position long, 31,000 coins, opened at 2621, unrealized profit of 3,710,000 U;
$HYPE 10x full position long, 158,000 coins, opened at 93, unrealized profit of 320,000 U.
The account's net unrealized profit is about 4,960,000 USDT, with cumulative funding fees of -950,000 U across the three positions.
His style remains: profits not taken, only going long, no position reduction, no hedging.
Book profits remain in the market; if the trend reverses, unrealized profits may quickly vanish.
Funding fees continue to be deducted, with a 130 million position risk hanging overhead.
How long the rally will last can only be left to the market. Brother Maji has deep capital to withstand volatility; retail investors should not blindly imitate, or else before the trend ends, positions may suffer heavy losses.
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 🔥 Why does a Costco rotisserie chicken make the crypto community perk up? 🍗
📈 The reason is simple: the market isn’t really focused on Costco itself, but on the underlying U.S. consumer. If consumption remains strong, it could mean inflationary pressures persist, and the Fed’s rate cuts might not come quickly.
💰 If the earnings report shows consumption cooling down, market expectations for future rate cuts and improved liquidity could heat up, and risk assets like BTC might price in this change early.
🌡️ So the logic is actually: consumption → inflation → Fed → interest rates → liquidity → risk assets.
🎯 The rotisserie chicken is just the surface; consumption is the real answer. What’s truly worth watching tonight is whether American consumers are loosening their wallets or not.
Brothers, do you think tonight’s earnings report is bullish or bearish for the crypto space? $BTC #财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 #欧洲央行上线代币化结算平台
The European Central Bank officially launched the tokenized settlement platform Pontes! This time it’s not about crypto speculation, but about integrating central bank money into on-chain finance.
On September 21, Pontes was launched, allowing banks and financial institutions to use central bank money to settle tokenized asset transactions. Institutions such as Deutsche Bank and Santander Bank have joined the initial participants. The core problem it solves is: even if assets like bonds are tokenized, the final transaction still requires secure and reliable funds settlement.
The European Central Bank is also preparing to invest a small amount of its own funds in tokenized securities, initially focusing on euro-denominated public sector bonds. Note, this does not mean the European Central Bank is starting to purchase $BTC or $ETH, nor is it the official issuance of a digital euro for ordinary consumers.
For the crypto market, what’s worth noting is the RWA infrastructure. After assets go on-chain, settlement, custody, compliance, and cross-platform interoperability all require support. Public chains like $ETH have the relevant technical ecosystem, but the launch of Pontes does not mean funds will flow directly into public chain tokens.
Pontes will gradually expand its functions, with full implementation expected by 2028. In the short term, the focus is on scale of adoption; in the long term, whether traditional finance can truly make on-chain settlement a routine business.This bull market hasn't reached its end yet, and the $DOGE trend is far from over.
Many people focus on the candlestick charts guessing the top, but I pay more attention to crude oil.
The logic is actually not complicated: if the Middle East situation gradually eases, the oil price premium caused by geopolitical conflicts may slowly fade. As oil prices fall, inflationary pressure will ease accordingly, the Federal Reserve's future policy space may expand, and market liquidity expectations will naturally improve.
The crypto market itself is very sensitive to liquidity, and $DOGE is a typical sentiment-driven asset. Community enthusiasm, market risk appetite, and related narratives could all be repriced when easing expectations heat up.
So I prefer to see the current volatility as a consolidation within the trend, rather than the end of the market.
The variables truly worth continuous observation remain crude oil and inflation. If oil prices keep falling and easing expectations further rise, risk assets might still have new room to grow.
Until a clear trend reversal appears, there's no need to rush to call the top based on short-term fluctuations.
Be patient and let time verify the trend. $DOGE BTC reached a high of 86,400 USD, OKX perpetual positions exceed 3.1 billion but funding rate is only 0.0012%
OKX order book shows BTC spot hitting 86,456 USDT, perpetual funding rate remains at 0.0012%, long leverage is not overheated, night session support first looks at 85,800.
I just switched to the OKX contract page for a glance, total perpetual open interest reached 8.085 billion USD, with BTC alone accounting for 3.172 billion. The fear and greed index reads 78, indicating extreme greed, but OKX's funding rate is only 0.0012%, equivalent to an annualized rate of about 1.31%, long position costs are very low, and the market is mainly supported by spot funds.
ETH spot on OKX is listed at 2,745.8 USDT, funding rate 0.0059%. The altcoin to BTC position ratio is only 0.981, funds have not significantly diverted to altcoins, mainly revolving around Bitcoin. For the night session, I’m watching two points: if the pullback holds at 85,800 USDT, the high-level consolidation remains valid; if it breaks below 85,500 and open interest drops by more than 300 million USD, longs will likely start closing positions and retreat.
Friends holding BTC perpetual contracts, is your defense line tonight set at 85,800 or lower? Energy unresolved, crypto moves first
$CL remains near $100, $BTC has reclaimed 85,000. The market is revisiting the bull run, but the situation in Iran has not faded.
On September 22, Brent crude continued to stay above $100. Reuters reported that only 17 commercial vessels passed through the Strait of Hormuz over the weekend, down from 37 the previous week, and about 125 daily before the war. Saudi Arabia intended to expand Red Sea exports, but the east-west oil pipeline was attacked, the Red Sea was disturbed by Houthi attacks, and some crude oil had to be rerouted through Hormuz.
Trump is willing to meet with the Iranian president, but whether negotiations can restart remains uncertain.
For crypto assets, the conflict cannot be simply classified as negative. If shipping is obstructed long-term, oil prices will carry a supply risk premium, disturbing inflation and Federal Reserve interest rate expectations; if negotiations progress, the energy risk premium may cool down.🔥 $ETH has climbed back above 【2700】. What truly deserves attention in this rally is the change in chip distribution beyond just the price.
📊 In the market, ETH ended nearly a month of sideways movement and broke through resistance near 【2660】. In the short term, watch 【2775—2825】; if it can hold firmly, there will be a chance to challenge 【3050】 next.
🏦 On the capital side, BitMine continues to increase holdings by about 【27,562 ETH】, with total holdings close to 【5.98 million】, of which about 【5.07 million】 are staked. Meanwhile, Lido is optimizing the validator configuration for approximately 【8.4 million】 staked ETH.
🔒 This means the market is experiencing three simultaneous changes: price breakout, increased corporate holdings, and improved staking capital efficiency. However, increased staking does not necessarily mean the price will rise; ultimately, it depends on real demand and capital flow.
🎯 In the short term, focus on support at 【2560】 and a breakout at 【2825】. If it falls below 【2350】, this bullish structure needs to be reassessed.
Brothers, do you think ETH can truly hold above 2800 this time? #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 #财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 9/23 Bitcoin Real-Time Overview $BTC
① Current price around $86,000, 24h +0.5%, 7-day increase over 11%, still fluctuating near an 8-month high
② Reasons for rise: First weekly close above the 50-week moving average (78,800) in 45 weeks, $660 million short liquidations in 24h, short squeeze + ETF capital inflow resonance
③ Key levels: Resistance at 87,000 and 90,000 above; support at 82,000 below, breaking 78,800 would invalidate the breakout logic
④ Suggestion: Don't chase the highs. Light, staggered buying near 82,000; add more once it holds above 87,000; this Friday's PCE is the next major test, keep some position flexibility.
$ETH #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 #财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 🔥$ETH 站上【2700】！这次真正值得看的，不只是涨了多少，而是三股力量正在同时收紧筹码。
📈 第一股是行情：BTC拉升后，ETH终于结束近一个月横盘，突破【2660】压力。短线先看【2775—2825】，站稳后再看【3050】。
🐋 第二股是机构：BitMine继续买入【27,562 ETH】，总持仓接近【598万枚】，其中约【507万枚】已经质押。ETH开始从“囤币”变成能产生收益的财库资产。
🔒 第三股是链上：Lido正在把约【840万枚】质押ETH整合进约4000个验证者。注意，这不是新增840万枚质押，而是提高原有资金的运行效率。
⚡ 三条线同时发生：价格突破、企业锁仓、质押效率提升。但真正确认仍看【2560】能否守住，以及【2825】能否突破；跌回【2350】下方，逻辑就要重新评估。
😂 BTC的故事是“以后可能更贵”，ETH则是“币也得去上班”。我的ETH也想去质押，可惜数量太少，去了只能算实习生！#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 📉 Taking a few days off — the losses have been heavy.
$ZEC: -$3,300+
$AKE: -$900
$ONE: -$360
$OFC: -$800
💸 Total damage: ~$5,360
Honestly, the problem was one word: GREED.
I had ~$2K in profit but didn’t take it, and the market reversed hard.
Sometimes the entry is right, but the exit is wrong. 🎯
No revenge trading. Wait for payday, reset, and come back with a better plan.
Protect capital. Survive first, profit later. 🧠📊
#ZEC #AKE #ONE #OFC #Crypto #Trading#ZEC38KShortClosed A $35M loss might not tell the whole story
A Garrett Jin-linked wallet closed its entire ~38K ZEC short, helping ZEC climb ~2.7% during the unwind. But here's what caught my attention: it reportedly kept ~202K ZEC spot.
That suggests the short may have been partly a hedge, not simply a failed bearish bet.
With NU7 approaching and funding still elevated, ZEC's next battle may be less bulls vs bears and more leverage vs fundamentals.
$ZEC 🚨 This wave of rally is starting to make the shorts a bit uneasy.
$BTC, $ETH, and $SOL, the three major assets, are all strengthening simultaneously, and those high-position short positions are beginning to struggle.
Once shorts start to cover en masse, prices tend to rise faster and faster.
But I’m not in a hurry to get excited here.
Because what we really need to watch now is:
Is this just shorts being forced to liquidate, or is a new trend actually starting?
If the price pulls back later and spot buying can still hold, it means the bulls aren’t just driven by liquidations.
But if shorts finish covering and buying immediately dries up, and the price returns to a consolidation range, then the sustainability of this rally is questionable.
So don’t just look at how pretty the candlesticks are.
True strength is when the market still has buyers even without the help of shorts.
The upcoming pullback might be more important than today’s rally. 👀
The above is just my personal market notes and does not constitute trading advice.
$BTC $ETH $SOL Policy Catalyst: On September 17, the SEC released the "Innovation Exemption" rule, allowing compliant platforms to offer tokenized stock trading (5-year regulatory exemption), igniting the market; Bitcoin has been strengthening continuously since last week, briefly surpassing $85,000 on Monday (9/21), with the total market capitalization rising to about $3.2 trillion this week.
Capital Inflow: Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of nearly $1 billion on September 21 alone; DOGE's surge is related to whale accumulation and institutional capital inflow.
Short Squeeze Characteristics: In the past 24 hours, about 136,000 liquidations occurred across the network, totaling $750 million, with short liquidations accounting for $650 million — the rise is driven by short covering, causing high volatility; meme coins like PEPE and DOGE show the greatest elasticity, so be cautious of chasing highs.$BCH decisively short! The bulls' profit ratio has already soared to 95.38%, with the average cost around 299. The long positions on board can be said to be enjoying profits per capita.
The scariest thing is that at times like this, everyone holds profits in their hands, and no one has the psychological burden of holding on to the end. Once the bears start pushing down, there's no need to wait for the bulls to be trapped; just these people rushing to take profits and sell will flood the market with enough sell orders to overwhelm the entire market.
Not to mention the bears are holding a large position of 56.6 million USDT. Don't help these high-position profit holders by buying the dip. Whoever wants to catch the falling knife can go ahead; short positions are directly set up. Next, let's see how the bulls trample each other!I was stubborn and didn't believe in the previous rebounds, but this time I've changed my mind: the bull market might really be here.
The reasons are right there on the chart. BTC surged from the dip at 74,896 straight up to 87,374, a 12,000-dollar jump. The daily WMA5, 10, and 20 all turned upward, and the price is riding above the moving averages, not just a spike. The few pullbacks in between were on low volume, and there’s buying around 85,000 — a market that can’t fall is truly strong.
The news has also been tested: interest rate hike expectations and US sanctions on Iranian exchanges would have crashed the market before, but this time it just wavered briefly and then recovered. Negative news can’t shake it, which shows the money behind it is solid; ETFs and corporate treasuries have been accumulating continuously.
I personally entered at 85,814 with a small 20x position, stop loss at 83,751, liquidation at 81,600. If it breaks, I accept the loss; the position is light enough that I won’t be upset about losing.
Here’s my clear view: the upside target is first 90,000, and if it holds, 100,000 is not a dream. But don’t chase above 87,000; a real bull market won’t miss this bite, just wait for a pullback.
This is my personal trading record and does not constitute advice; profits and losses are your own responsibility.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 Can a single moving average determine the health of a trend? The answer is: yes, but the premise is that you look at the "distance" and "slope" between the price and the moving average, not just the golden cross.
Take $CHR as an example; this is the most typical teaching sample today. The current price is 0.02573, a 24-hour surge of 46.53%. MA5 (0.021738) has clearly crossed above MA20 (0.0187735), the moving averages are in a bullish alignment, and the slope is steep, indicating the trend direction is upward, which is undisputed. But the problem lies in the "distance": the price has already far surpassed the upper Bollinger Band at 0.0234495, and the RSI is as high as 93.4, which is a severe overbought zone. In other words, the trend is healthy, but the position is not.
A healthy trend should have the price moving up close to the moving average, not drifting too far away like now. So my judgment is: the direction is bullish, but do not chase the highs; wait for a pullback. The entry reference range is set at 0.0235–0.0245, near the upper Bollinger Band and also a reasonable short-term moving average retracement zone. Take profit 1 is at 0.0280, corresponding to the measured extension after the breakout; take profit 2 is at 0.0310, referencing the previous high psychological level. The stop loss is set at 0.0208; breaking below MA5 means the short-term bullish structure is broken.#AppleGoogleStablecoin Big Tech may be getting closer to crypto payments 👀
Apple is hiring for Apple Pay and Cash roles where stablecoin and tokenized-deposit knowledge is preferred. Google Cloud wants Web3 architects serving banks, exchanges and custodians.
What stands out is neither has announced a crypto product yet.
The hires may be the signal. Stablecoins are moving from a crypto niche toward payment infrastructure, and Apple and Google may not want to arrive late.If you also believe that UNI has a chance to retest 15-20U in the bull market, then the price below 9U now is indeed worth paying attention to, at least from an odds perspective.
It's quite interesting to think about.
Usually, people invest tens of thousands of dollars into those Meme coins that can be halved or even go to zero overnight without batting an eye.
But when it comes to $UNI, a project with real products, real users, fee income, and ongoing value capture expectations, people start to hesitate.
This is actually the most interesting part of the market:
The assets truly worth researching are often not the ones with the best stories, but those that already have business, users, and cash flow logic, just suppressed during market downturns.
For UNI now, it's not about daily price fluctuations, but whether DeFi, on-chain trading, compliance, and new scenarios like Robinhood can continue to open up incremental growth.
So below 9U, I prefer to see it as an odds range.
As for whether it can reach 15-20U, it ultimately depends on the market cycle and fundamentals being realized.
In a bull market, it's never just about courage, but whether you dare to research those assets that truly have substance before the market fully recognizes them. $YB belongs to perpetual micro contracts, with the order book showing 0.09886 short and 0.09306 spot, 20x floating profit of 117.26%. The price chart shows a deep V-shaped peak in the early session followed by a stepped decline, with a slight rise at the end. It is dominated by net buyers outside the spot market, characterized by low circulation matched trading and contract long-short squeezes.
On-chain structure usually shows highly concentrated coin holdings, shallow liquidity, significant slippage on large orders, and constant selling pressure without a real burn mechanism. Under 20x leverage, a price pullback of about 5% (to around 0.0975) approaches forced liquidation, with actual tolerance less than 4.5% (including fee losses).
0.09306 is close to the lower bound of recent consolidation; if it cannot hold, it will retest 0.091-0.092, and breaking below will test previous lows; if it rebounds to 0.096, spot volume must surge, otherwise shorts will range sideways and incur fees. The trend is a distribution phase after a short squeeze. $BTC $AKE #Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓 $BTC: Current price 86,129. Support at 85,000, resistance at 87,374. Encountering resistance on the rally, range-bound oscillation, bulls and bears are evenly matched, no clear trend.
$ETH: Current price 2,753. Support at 2,710, resistance at 2,806. Moving sideways with BTC, low volatility, waiting for direction.
$MUBARAK: Current price 0.083182, 24h high 0.0835, up over 90%. Strong surge followed by a pullback. MEME is highly volatile, high risk of retracement, avoid chasing at highs.
Regarding shorting mini coins:
· Challenges: Poor liquidity, high market control, easy short squeezes, negative fee rate bleeding, sudden spikes causing liquidations.
· Conclusion: It’s not that you can short just because the price has risen a lot, nor is it about "just keep shorting."
· Discipline: Light positions, stop losses, don’t hold losing trades. Otherwise, the probability of success is very low.
Personal opinion, not investment advice.
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 ETH stands in the middle of the range, and the most expensive move is called "fear of missing out"
2707 is the 24-hour low, 2808 is the high, and $ETH was about $2740 at the time of writing, positioned in the lower middle of the range. This position is neither close to clear support nor has it completed an upward breakout, so the information is limited, yet it most easily triggers the anxiety of "if I don't buy now, it will go up."
Fear of missing out usually makes people ignore the risk-reward ratio. The upward distance to 2808 is less than $70, while the downward distance to 2707 is only about $33, which seems to allow betting on a rebound; but if the real stop loss is placed below 2700, the space is not as wide as imagined. More importantly, the price has not yet proven that 2755 and 2776 have been reclaimed.
Waiting is not bearish, but rather letting the market provide more evidence. You can wait for support to appear near 2700, or wait for a breakout above 2808 followed by a pullback confirmation. Both entry methods are clearer than being pushed by emotions in the middle of the range because the invalidation conditions can be determined in advance.
$ETH will not lose its long-term value just because you miss a trade. What really hurts the account is often not missing the rise, but taking the most unnecessary risk at the most ambiguous position to avoid missing out. Staying out and waiting is itself an effective position.
Patience does not create excitement, but it can avoid repeatedly paying fees between the upper and lower boundaries.#AMD market cap surpasses $1 trillion, chip stocks surge collectively. Folks, AMD has officially joined the trillion-dollar club. Last night, chip stocks surged together, with Intel, Arm, Qualcomm, and Nvidia all following the rally.
This surge is not just about computing power stories, but a comprehensive explosion in AI inference demand. Meta's newly launched AI Agent Muse is gaining popularity quickly, and the market suddenly realizes that AI running on endpoints not only consumes GPUs but also drives demand for CPUs and server chips. AMD happens to be at this critical point, benefiting from this wave of expectations.
For the crypto community, this means the AI narrative continues to heat up. Those AI concept and computing power-related tokens will also be emotionally driven. But folks need to understand that the core logic in crypto right now is not AI, but macro liquidity.
Bitcoin is oscillating near the high of 87,000, and the Federal Reserve's rate hike pressure hasn't fully eased. Even if chip stocks surge fiercely, it doesn't mean crypto can directly follow the rally. Don't blindly rush into AI concept tokens just because AMD broke the trillion mark; those have long been hyped to the sky $AMD $BTC $ETH ₿ $BTC and $ETH — The next moves are crucial
The "next step" for $BTC is to confirm a breakout or a fakeout, while for $ETH it is whether to keep up or fall behind.
$BTC: Standing above $86,000, the test is whether it can "hold or not"
$BTC just touched $87,395, the highest since January 29. Glassnode's MVRV ratio has broken above the 365-day moving average, the same signal that appeared in the early stages of bull markets in 2019 and 2023. Analyst Kevin Capital even raised the probability of a cycle bottom from 70% to 90%-95%.
But risk signals are also clear: the core driver of this rally is short positions being forcibly liquidated (shorts worth $647.9 million liquidated on Monday), rather than spot buying actively taking over. More importantly, open interest actually increased by 7.59% after shorts were liquidated, reaching about $156 billion. This means that after shorts were eliminated, new leveraged longs immediately filled the gap, so the market's leverage level has not decreased but is instead accumulating new vulnerabilities.
Glassnode's options data also confirms this: long leverage is "slowly rebuilding," and the funding rate remains below neutral. There is no overheated sentiment, but also no evidence of spot buying taking over.
What to watch next for $BTC: whether it can hold the $85,000-$86,000 range. If it falls below $82,000 (previous resistance turned support), the risk of a fake breakout will significantly increase.
$ETH: Left behind by $BTC, testing if it can catch up
$ETH is currently in the $2,700-$2,800 range, while $BTC has already returned near its January highs; $ETH is still far from its previous highs.
However, some analysts have provided a clear long-term framework: Peter Brandt believes $ETH's long-term resistance is at $5,000, and only after breaking through that can it aim for $8,600. The significance of this target price is that ETH is currently less than half of that, indicating it is either seriously undervalued or the market believes it needs to prove it can hold $2,800-$3,000 first.
In the short-term structure, $ETH's futures open interest on Binance has increased about 37% since September, reaching a 9-month high. The funding rate is positive (longs pay shorts), showing bullish sentiment dominance, but ETF fund flows are volatile—both outflows and inflows—indicating institutional consensus on $ETH is far less clear than on $BTC.
What to watch next for $ETH: $2,550 is a key observation line. If it can hold and stabilize above $2,800, $3,000 is the next psychological barrier; if it falls below $2,550, this breakout may be judged as a fakeout within a long-term consolidation range.
In summary
The problem with $BTC is "new leverage is coming in too fast," and the problem with $ETH is "spot consensus is not strong enough." Neither has yet exited the danger zone. BITCOIN’S MOVE ABOVE $87,000 LAST NIGHT WIPED OUT $1.2 BILLION IN LIQUIDATIONS
That squeeze absolutely crushed short positioning
Now liquidity map has flipped
$86.5K–$90K→~$1.6B still sitting above
$77.5K–$85K→~$5.8B stacked below
$BTC still has room to sweep higher toward $90K,much larger liquidity pool now sits underneath price
That’s what makes next move interesting.If momentum keeps building,$90K remains play
But if $BTC starts losing strength,$5.8B below becomes obvious zone to watchOrder book 0.06149→0.07559, 20x long profit 458.61%. The price movement is not a stepped slow climb but a vertical surge in the middle segment, followed by a long period of horizontal oscillation, and a slight rise at the end. Combined with on-chain data, $LA as a typical micro-cap Meme has no substantial burn, with 24h turnover mostly relying on contract amplification rather than net spot buying pressure.
20x tolerance is 5% (0.0718 liquidation line), actual tolerance less than 4.5% (including fees). At 0.07559, bulls and bears are deadlocked; holding above this level targets 0.08, failing which it may return to 0.07. Core question: Is the slight rise at the end driven by spot market relay forcing a short squeeze, or is it a manipulation by controllers using high-level liquidity to induce longs? $ETH $ZEC #AMD市值突破1万亿美元，芯片股集体大涨 Dogecoin's roller coaster: 0.09 is the real battleground
Within a day, Dogecoin went through the full cycle of "hope—excitement—existential doubt." It surged from 0.084 all the way to 0.09, just as you thought it was about to break free, it shot up to 0.105, then sharply dropped back to 0.09. Behind the candlesticks, it's all the breath of emotions.
But this time, I'm not so panicked. What really matters to watch is not how high it climbs, but whether the funds have completely withdrawn after the rally. Around 0.10 has become a clear emotional watershed—pushing up is emotion, holding steady is consensus.
Many people shout "it's over" when they see a spike and fall, but I prefer to see it as an emotional cooldown. For a coin like Doge, the biggest fear is never a pullback, but no one talking, no one trading, no one excited. Now that attention is back, this is far more important than a single bullish candle.
I missed selling yesterday and got my leg slapped hard. But after calming down, I think whether 0.09 can hold steady is far more meaningful than just touching 0.105 earlier. I've held from 0.084 until now, already experiencing a full cycle of despair and excitement, so waiting for another pullback isn't a problem.
Once it stabilizes, I will continue to hold. Dogecoin's script has never been a straight line, but a heartbeat. #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 $IRYS 10x long position, entry at 0.01446, exit (marked) at 0.0161, floating profit 113.41%. Early phase showed consolidation, late phase surged vertically. Recently, IRYS as the Arweave ecosystem's data availability layer has been continuously gaining attention; the underlying storage narrative supports buying pressure, but token unlocking and staking sell pressure remain.
With 10x leverage, a price move of 11.3% is amplified, a pullback of about 10% (around 0.0145) triggers liquidation, so actual tolerance is less than 9%. Currently at 0.0161 near the phase high, longs are crowded, and sideways movement results in fee loss.
Question: Can the real buying demand in the IRYS ecosystem sustain this late-stage rally, or is the 10x floating profit only meant to exist before the spike? $ETH $BTC #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 Why was SanDisk suddenly ignited?
The core catalyst is Rosenblatt's first coverage, directly giving a buy rating with a target price of $2400 — 36% higher than the stock price at that time. The report states that AI inference workload is upgrading NAND from ordinary storage to critical infrastructure, and SanDisk's long-term agreements with eight major customers may cover about 65% of FY28 capacity.
Key levels
The upper 1832 is the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level; a breakout target looks at 1980 and 2100. The lower 1730 is the short-term watershed; breaking below means the breakout failed.
My view
If it opens today and directly rushes to 1832, don't rush to chase — wait for a 5-hour level volume close above before following. If it first pulls back to 1740-1760 with low volume consolidation, that is actually a more comfortable observation point. The direction is biased bullish, but entry position is more important than direction.
For reference only, not investment advice. $SNDK 🔥 Short position space is about to be exhausted
The market has just reversed the situation.
$BTC, $ETH, and $SOL are rising, while late-stage short sellers are trapped on the wrong side.
At that time, after $BTC broke through $84,000, a chain liquidation was triggered, forcing the closure of over $648 million in short positions, with $BTC shorts accounting for $278 million. This short-covering-driven buying directly pushed the price above $87,000.
But the real risk signal is: open interest did not decrease; instead, it increased. After shorts were liquidated, positions were immediately replaced, and the total open interest in perpetual contracts climbed to nearly $160 billion, a new 11-month high.
This means the current upward momentum has changed. Previously it was "shorts forced to buy," now it has become "new leveraged longs actively chasing the rally." A QCP Group trader said: "Leverage is running ahead of spot."
The current structure is more fragile than a few days ago:
· Funding rates: $BTC and $SOL rates are both in a neutral to slightly low range, $ETH is slightly long but not extreme. The market does not show widespread extreme bullish sentiment, but this is actually a problem—the new leveraged longs are not paying enough "holding cost," so if prices fall, they will exit quickly.
· Spot demand has not taken over: During the short squeeze, ETF net inflows remained negative, about $300 million outflow. Galaxy Digital's research head pointed out that recovering the 50-week moving average has historically often confirmed a bottom, but that requires continuous spot buying to verify, which is not yet met.
Simply put: the short squeeze ride has reached its stop. Next, either spot buying takes over to continue pushing, or leveraged longs themselves become the fuel for the next wave of liquidations. An analyst from $BTC Markets put it more bluntly: "A short squeeze can create price, but it cannot create long-term holders."15 million USD is not a large amount in today's crypto primary market. What really matters is the list of investors: FalconX, Arrington, plus several well-known individual LPs.
This indicates that the money hasn't left the market; it has just shifted from retail narratives to institutional selection. Funds invest only 250,000 to 750,000 USD per deal, focusing on the Day Zero to Seed stage.
This amount means they are not chasing established projects but betting on teams that haven't been priced yet. The first fund invested in Monad, Ethena, Nous Research, so the path is already very clear.
The point of concern is that institutions are moving to earlier entry points, leaving less pricing power for the secondary market. Watch the LP composition of the next round of similar funds; if the proportion of individual investors continues to decline, this judgment will hold.
#欧洲央行上线代币化结算平台
#SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI盘中涨超21% #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 $BTC #波动雷达：币种异动观察
Just closed my $BTC position, holding U now, but I can't sit still, so I impulsively opened a $XAU gold contract grid.
Ran it for less than a day (14 hours), invested 88.88U for good luck, 20x leverage long. Currently floating profit +3.69%, grid earned 1.9U, and the base position also gained a bit. Watching the curve slowly climb without big swings feels pretty comfortable.
But the only thing that makes me want to curse is the funding rate on gold! It's way too high!
Going long on gold perpetuals, this funding rate is like a dull knife cutting flesh. The grid profits are hard-earned small arbitrage gains, but then you see the longs have to pay the shorts high daily interest. If it stays sideways for a few days, all the grid's spread profits end up working to pay the funding fees!
So why did I still open it? Because Goldman Sachs just said the Fed's rate hikes will slow gold's upward pace but won't change the long-term bull structure. I figured gold oscillating around 4300 to digest is reasonable, so I set a wide grid from 4256 to 4458, with a liquidation price at 4097, a thick enough safety cushion, and let it run on its own.
After the heart-stopping holding during the big BTC moves, playing gold grid now feels especially calm. No guessing tops or bottoms, no midnight monitoring, even if the funding rate is a bit high, as long as the range fluctuations cover the cost, making some pocket money for groceries is fine.The whole screen is shouting 86,000! But the real market-changing event, almost no one is paying attention to it
Brothers, today the entire internet is flooded with Bitcoin $BTC breaking 86,000, short liquidations, how much ETF inflow there is—
But what’s really worth pausing to look at is another piece of news that hardly anyone is sharing:
Circle $CRCL has launched a new service where institutions can borrow USDC using Bitcoin.
At first glance, it seems like "another stablecoin company launched a new product," unrelated to the market?
Don’t rush, this is worth a deep dive; it’s very significant.
1. What it does is not to make institutions buy more coins, but to let institutions get money without selling coins
Let’s break down the business logic in plain language:
Clients deposit BTC into custody → mint a 1:1 pegged certificate → use this certificate as collateral in a third-party lending market → borrow USDC directly into their account.
What’s the key?
The coins remain safely in custody untouched, but the money is already in hand.
Previously, if institutions needed money, there was basically only one way: sell.
Now there’s another way: use coins to get liquidity.
2. This is the real game-changer: the motivation for selling pressure changes
Market ups and downs are essentially about buying and selling forces.
Previously, when institutions needed cash, they had to dump coins to get cash—this was one source of selling pressure.
But now, "selling coins" is no longer the only way to cash out.
Chips are locked in custody, and if the borrowed money flows back into the market, the circulating supply only gets thinner.
Got it?
As more institutions learn to "keep coins still, get money in hand,"
the potential sell-off decreases, and the fuel for price rises actually increases.
3. What’s more intense is that this is not an isolated move
A few days ago, it just launched its own settlement chain mainnet;
Previously, wrapped Bitcoin was already launched;
Now, it adds a layer of on-chain lending.
Issuing stablecoins, managing custody, handling settlement, lending—
several components come together to form a closed loop:
Collateral goes in, stablecoins come out, settled on its own chain.
This starts to be different.
4. But the ugly truth must be said upfront
Over-collateralization and liquidation thresholds are set by third-party lending protocols,
meaning the risk hasn’t disappeared, it’s just moved from exchange ledgers onto the chain.
In extreme market conditions, liquidations still run automatically;
And with an extra layer of wrapped certificates, it means an additional trust point in custody and cross-chain.
Some peers insist on not wrapping, preferring Bitcoin to stay in original custody.
5. Conclusion: what really matters is not just this one company
The progress of this one company isn’t important,
What matters is how fast the model of "borrowing money without moving coins out of custody" spreads.
If it really becomes a routine operation for institutions,
Then the fuel for the next price surge might not be new buyers,
But those who originally planned to sell suddenly not selling.
The market is still driven by news calls, but real structural changes often start quietly like this. $0G 20x long position, entry at 0.1884, target at 0.2384, floating profit 530.78%. Price moved about 26.5%, with a long zigzag slow climb, and a vertical surge at the end. Recently, AI/DePIN cross-narrative partial rotation, 0G on-chain shows high circulation and shallow depth characteristics, with concentrated holders causing large buy-sell slippage.
20x tolerance (drawdown liquidation line) about 5% (around 0.2265), actual tolerance less than 4.5%. Currently at 0.2384 near the phase high, long positions are crowded, and sideways movement causes fee losses.
Question: Is the sharp rally at the end a spot relay squeeze, or is the controlling party quietly distributing liquidity at the high position? Can the 530% floating profit be maintained? $ZEC $ETH #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿