Orbit Post Sitemap
🚀 DON’T GIVE UP ON THE ETH MOVE JUST YET! Come on, $ETH — keep pushing toward $2,800! 🐋🔥 I opened a long around $2,693.28 with 2 ETH. With ETH now around $2,721, the position is showing roughly +57U unrealized, or about +106% on the margin. Meanwhile, $BTC has already pushed toward $86,253, while ETH is still working its way higher from the $2,700 area. In the past, I used to get nervous after making a small profit and close too early—only to regret watching the move continue without me. Thisthis pattern closely, relying on buyback gimmicks to repeatedly lure longs, followed by a sharp drop and low-level consolidation. My original intention was to wait for a second weakness.
Today it pulled up slightly, I proactively reduced leverage, didn’t push hard to 20x, leaving myself enough safety margin. The forced liquidation price at 0.527 is far away, risk is controllable, no panic selling, continuing to observe if the upper resistance can be broken. Big coin $BTC is currently at 86000,
It once surged to 86995 in the early morning,
Just 500 dollars short of the eight-month high,
But then it was pushed back down,
This is the second time within a week it has hit resistance near 87000.
Second coin $ETH is around 2710, mainly following the rise,
It surged to 2777 on the 1-hour chart before pulling back,
Overall trend is a bit weaker than BTC.
On the liquidation side, 2,554 above is the level bulls need to defend.
Rhythm judgment follows BTC,
Lacking independent narrative drive, short-term outlook depends on big coin's mood.
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
#霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变
#OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ 🚨 I’m still holding both shorts — and I’m not chasing the bounce.
$ZEC short: 1,317.3 → still watching 1,400 as my invalidation.
$ETH short: 2,713.7 → currently in profit, with 2,750 as the key level.
Both charts are showing weak rebounds and fading momentum. For me a bounce is still a potential shorting opportunity.
🎯 Targets: ZEC 1,230 | ETH 2,650
I’m keeping it simple: protect the downside, don’t get greedy, and let price confirm the next move.
Still watching $BTC closely.
#DailyOrbit Daily Crypto Talk｜ETH 4H Range Consolidation, Breakout Still Awaiting Volume Confirmation
As of 10-05 17:17 (Beijing Time), Binance Spot ETH/USDT at 2718.45, 24H +0.71%. Daily chart shows range consolidation, 4H chart also consolidating.
Resistance at 2737—2742, 2774.83—2779.83; Support at 2698.01—2703.02, 2689.82—2694.83.
[Conditional Trading Plan]
Direction: Long; After confirmation, enter limit order at 2700.51, stop loss at 2675.47, take profit at 2739.5 USDT; planned risk-reward ratio 1.55:1 (fees not included).
Trigger: After 4H candle closes firmly above MA20, and price retraces near 2700.51 with 1H volume at least 1.2 times the average volume for confirmation. After confirmation, only place limit order at this entry price, no chasing price; invalid if stop loss is hit or no execution within 8 hours from data time.
Attached chart includes full indicator analysis. For technical analysis purposes only, not investment advice.1.14 billion DOGE have entered whale wallets, so why is the price still stuck in place?
Dogecoin currently shows an intriguing mismatch: big holders are accumulating, yet the price hasn't broken above $0.10. In recent days, market reports indicate that large wallets have collectively taken in about 1.14 billion DOGE, equivalent to approximately $112 million at the time; meanwhile, U.S. Dogecoin investment products saw a weekly net inflow of about $2.9 million, hitting a recent high.
The numbers look impressive, but don't rush to call a major uptrend. There are two possible explanations for large wallet purchases: one is phased accumulation, the other is address consolidation; on-chain data can't distinguish the motive. The product inflows are similar — a weekly peak doesn't indicate a trend, only continuous net inflows count. Currently, DOGE is still grinding within the $0.092–$0.098 tug-of-war zone, with buying having a story and selling having inventory; neither side is dominating.
The only true strong signal for $DOGE is a volume breakout with a retest that holds. The sharp spike when the news broke doesn't count; that's just an emotional reflex. Whales can ignite the fire, but whether it turns into a trend depends on spot market follow-through. The more people gather around the fire, the more you need to watch trading volume, not just wallet addresses.and MA20 in a bearish alignment pressing down hard, I was glad I chose to stay out and rest these days.
The crypto world is not a place where hard work always pays off; frequently staring at the screen and opening trades back and forth often ends up with being killed on both long and short sides, plus paying a bunch of fees. When the market is in a downtrend consolidation phase (MACD dead cross but green bars shrinking, KDJ's J value already hitting 1.73 extreme oversold), rather than suffering$ETH short! A 25x long position worth 64.3 million, with the liquidation price openly set at 2650, just about 70 dollars away from the current price. Isn't this a giant prey delivered on a silver platter?
Just saw an on-chain anomaly: a whale opened a 25x long position of 23,700 ETH, with a total value reaching 64.3 million USD, and the liquidation price is clearly visible at 2650 across the entire network.
Think about it from another perspective: with such a big chunk of meat hanging right in front, would the main force generously pump the price up with their own money to let it comfortably feast? Absolutely not! The path of least resistance for the harvest is to smash down another 70 dollars, liquidating all these 64 million long positions in one go.
Going long now is purely sacrificial, directly siding with the main force. The short position is well set up, just waiting for the liquidation at 2650!Heartbeat session 😵💫.
$LIT 50x short position, opened at 3.64, marked up to 3.81, directly took -198U (-226%)... This hundredfold (oh no, 50x) poison is really fierce.
Fortunately, $UP 10x short position performed well, opened at 0.2075 and closed at 0.1881, gained +228U (+93%).
One positive and one negative barely hedge each other, the short's dignity is fully supported by UP. High leverage is really like licking the blade, survived again today. If $BTC ever reaches $300K, we’re not just talking about another rally — we’d be looking at a completely new chapter for crypto. What could drive that kind of move? ➤ ~$6T BTC market cap A $300K Bitcoin would push its market value into the multi-trillion-dollar range, bringing it much closer to gold as a global store-of-value asset. ➤ Institutional demand keeps growing Spot ETFs, corporations, sovereign investors and long-term holders could continue absorbing BTC supply, potentially creating a soverpass.
To save my life, I chose to take a break and stay put for two or three days.
Guess what? I avoided tens of thousands of dollars in losses, and when I came back to check ZEC's daily chart, the price was still hovering around 1316, not even touching the MA5 (1322)!
Controlling your hands is also a top-level trade
After resting for two or three days, looking back at ZEC's position, it was still lingering around 1300, without any decent one-sided move. Seeing the daily MA5, MA10, Thought the rebound had me winning? The market quickly reminded me who’s boss. 😂
$BTC profit pulled back hard, but the core position stays intact.
$SOL remains my calmest hold thanks to isolated margin.
$NEAR almost reached break-even, then slipped back—lesson learned: don’t wait for the perfect exit.
Markets humble everyone eventually. 📉
#BTC #SOL #NEAR #Crypto
#OKXNOW:LiveTomorrow #SolanaStocksTop4.4B #StrategyBuys1665BTC $TAO Every time it pulls back, I see it as a buying opportunity.
The support mentioned earlier has never truly been broken, indicating that the backing is still quite strong.
In terms of operation, if it doesn't break around 290, you can continue holding; take partial profits between 320 and 325, and after breaking 350, look for the next move.
Currently, TAO is near $300, with key technical support also concentrated around 290.
After the last share, $0G has also been quite strong, gradually rising by about 50% at its peak.
Current support is around 0.29, with strong support at 0.27;
The big trend for these two coins is bullish, buy on dips, take partial profits at resistance levels, and do not chase the rally.
$ATH The small lottery has also been rising steadily.
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 @OKX中文 The Fourth Truth: The Protocol Itself Is Also "Leaking"
Another overlooked signal of CT's sharp decline comes from issues within the protocol itself.
A user disclosed in the community: "After depositing for a week, yesterday the interest was completely deducted from the net asset value, and even a few U were lost. The official website has not published any address or proof of funds. A 140 million TVL delta-neutral protocol losing 0.2% of net asset value at once without any extreme market conditions indicates a problem with the hedging strategy."
Another community pointed out that Concrete's treasury suffered a 0.49% slippage loss during rebalancing trades, suggesting that the routing chose liquidity sources with insufficient depth or did not set appropriate slippage protection at all.
There is a gap between the protocol's narrative of "institutional-grade yield infrastructure" and the actual user experience. When prices rise, this gap is ignored. When prices fall, all ignored issues are repriced.
$BTC $ETH $CT #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变 #OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ First, let's present the opposing view: Even if the direction of $HYPE is correct, the current position may cause those following the trend to incur higher costs.
The current price is 93.16, about 3.77% away from the 1-hour support at 89.65, and about 0.65% away from the resistance at 93.77. Looking at the distances on both sides together is closer to the real risk than just focusing on a single rising or falling candlestick.
The most dangerous misconception about $HYPE right now is equating "strong trend" directly with "continuing to chase is safe."
Both the 1-hour and 4-hour charts are relatively strong, with RSI values at 78 and 88 respectively. The strength hasn't disappeared, but the sentiment is already crowded; at this point, what's truly important is not guessing the highest point, but seeing if the high-level support can quickly recover any pullback.
My observation line is very clear: only by standing back above and holding 93.77 can the short-term initiative be regained; if it breaks below 89.65, attention should shift to the 4-hour support at 86.16. If pressure continues above, the 4-hour resistance at 93.77 is temporarily just a distant reference, not a preset target.
This is not an after-the-fact excuse: in the next round, I will continue to verify 93.77 and 89.65, recording when conditions are met and reviewing when invalidated.
Do you think this is a normal overheating in a strong trend, or is the risk already greater than the remaining space?
The market is volatile; the above is only a market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is from Coin Circle Bull.Talking about NEAR again, it’s quite strong today, so I’ll share my thoughts.
NEAR’s first entry point in this pullback is at the red box 1. Entering here carries the highest risk but also the highest risk-reward ratio. The reason is that this is only a brief support level, and the structure is still downward, so the risk is greater.
The second entry is at 4.737, where the risk is much lower. Yesterday, I also posted my insights about entering NEAR at this point. This is a quick support level after the pullback to the previous rebound high of 4.737.
The third red box is actually a resistance level. I clearly wrote in a post yesterday that the position at 5.16 is where, if you have already bottomed in, you should consider taking profits or, if stuck, consider exiting.
Practical advice: Wait for ETH’s current pullback to finish before entering again, because NEAR has indeed completed its adjustment and is strengthening again. It will just follow the market’s ups and downs, so catching the market rhythm naturally means you can maximize gains every time!!Tomorrow OKX Now, Singapore opens.
Glanced at the agenda: Star Xu keynote, product demos, Dev Day hackathon finals, with a full public live broadcast.
For this kind of conference, the scale doesn't matter; the only highlight is whether there is anything substantial. X Layer has been developed for two years, and the projects built by the Dev Day finals builders using X Layer and OKX AI might actually be more worth watching than the main stage—whether the ecosystem works is best judged by builders voting with their feet.
Token2049 is the day after, and the OKX special session is the day before, clearly aiming to seize the narrative. Tomorrow's live broadcast is worth tuning in to listen.#财报观察员：美光上调指引，存储需求继续走强 Indonesia "turns back": Commodity exchanges allow the use of the US dollar, the de-dollarization slogan clashes with palm oil reality
Originally, Indonesia was a pioneer of "local currency settlement": CBI, LCT, and local currency clearing sets with China and India, determined to push the US dollar off the Southeast Asian counter. But the latest regulatory trend has shifted — commodity futures exchanges (such as ICDX) plan to allow some bulk commodity contracts to be quoted/settled in US dollars, especially for products like palm oil, nickel, and coal, whose export pricing power lies abroad.
Why the concession? In plain terms:
Buyers want US dollars: Chinese refineries, Indian crushers, and Japanese-Korean traders anchor contracts to Malaysian palm oil/CME, forcing local currency = pushing orders to Singapore;
Nickel price power is not in Jakarta: Indonesia is the largest nickel mining country, but pricing still depends on LME and US dollar liquidity; hard decoupling = losing volume;
Local currency settlement has pitfalls: Indonesian rupiah fluctuates greatly, forward hedging is expensive, traders prefer paying extra exchange fees rather than bearing exchange rate risk.
But don’t interpret this as a "de-dollarization failure": Indonesia is playing a layered game — strategic materials and state-owned enterprises use local currency; international commodities and those with deep foreign participation use US dollars. Like a dual-track system of "domestic grain prices in rupiah, export palm oil in US dollars." #OKXNOW: The future has arrived, and major content is being unveiled. Over the past few years, among these "future tenses," what I have anticipated most is AI evolving from analyzing information to executing automated strategies.
Around-the-clock trading, asset tokenization, and the globalization of digital currencies essentially represent upgrades to market infrastructure and asset forms; whereas AI automated strategy execution changes how traders participate in the market. The crypto market operates 7×24 hours with high volatility, making it difficult to maintain long-term stability relying on manual monitoring and emotional decisions. If AI only stays at "analyzing information and providing opinions," its value is limited; the real qualitative change is: after a signal triggers, automatically completing position calculation, order placement, stop-loss/take-profit, and risk control circuit breakers, turning discipline into programmable capability.
Especially in trading scenarios like OKX, if strategy backtesting, live deployment, real-time monitoring, and abnormal circuit breakers can be integrated, ordinary traders can also achieve institutional-level execution efficiency. Of course, risks exist: model homogenization, black-box decision-making, extreme market slippage, and API permission security all require product-level solutions. Therefore, what I look forward to OKX NOW 2026 showcasing is not "AI signal calling," but auditable, backtestable, and risk-controllable automated strategy tools.
The future is not AI predicting price rises or falls for you, but handing execution over to the system and leaving decision-making to humans. Which change do you look forward to the most?
#OKX NOW 2026#The morning surge of $ZEC felt more like a last gasp before a crash. Although I've been stuck for over 50 days, the big trend for this meme coin is zero. As long as I can still break even, I'll just hold on honestly. The maximum unrealized loss was over $3500. Cutting losses would mean working five months of screw-driving for nothing to save $3500. I still believe I can break even this month. In the future, I'll cut losses when I should. This time, the meme coin taught me a lesson.🚨 I’VE SEEN THIS SCRIPT BEFORE… AND IT NEVER ENDS WELL.
BTC is pushing back toward $87K, and yeah, my shorts are taking some heat right now. 😂
But I’m not panicking.
The pattern feels familiar: pump → trap late longs → then a sharp correction.
I’m watching for a 10–20% pullback if the rejection comes.
Still floating red, but I’m staying patient. Let’s see how this plays out. 👀
$BTC $ETH
#DailyOrbit 🚨 Citibank raises its 12-month targets for $BTC and $ETH.
₿ Bitcoin: $82,000 → $113,000
Ξ Ethereum: $2,240 → $3,028
This marks Citibank’s third forecast revision this year, reversing part of the downside adjustment made in late June.
The bullish revision is being driven by four key factors:
• Renewed spot ETF inflows
• Higher crypto market trading activity
• Improving macroeconomic conditions
• Stronger overall institutional demand.
#DailyOrbit #FedSeptemberMinutes #HormuzStillClosed $NEAR ETF không nhất thiết sẽ lặp lại những gì đã xảy ra với $SOL Đúng là cả hai đều tăng mạnh trước khi có ETF giao ngay: → SOL: tăng khoảng 24 lần từ đáy chu kỳ → NEAR: tăng khoảng 5 lần Cách lý giải đơn giản là: “SOL giảm sau khi có ETF, vậy NEAR cũng sẽ như thế.” Nhưng thời điểm hoàn toàn khác nhau Khi BSOL ra mắt vào tháng 10 năm 2025, SOL ở mức khoảng 195 USD và đà tăng của chu kỳ đã bắt đầu suy yếu. Hoạt động DEX trên Solana giảm mạnh so với đỉnh hồi tháng 1. NEAR bước vào giai đoạn ETIn the past 30 days, short-term Bitcoin holders have acquired approximately 87,000 more BTC.
CryptoQuant analyst Axel Adler Jr. reports that as of October 4, short-term holders (those who have traded within the last 6 months) hold about 3.94 million BTC. The 30-day holding change has been positive for 7 consecutive weeks, and has not turned negative since August 18.
The average cost for this group is now about $74,100, up roughly $1,000 from a week ago; their overall unrealized profit is about 15%, similar to last week but below the peak of about 19% on September 22.
At the time of writing, BTC on OKX is around 85,990, about $12,000 above this cost line.
My view: The number of new entrants is increasing, and their cost is rising with the price, indicating some are willing to keep buying above $80,000. The $74,100 level is the psychological floor for this group; if it breaks, the overall position turns to unrealized loss, and panic selling is most likely to emerge around there.
A reminder: The cost line is only a reference point, not a buy or sell signal; if the 30-day holding change also turns negative, it indicates this group is starting to exit.
$BTC #Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元
$4.4 billion, this is no small amount 📈
Previously, when people talked about RWA, it always felt like pie in the sky or slow progress on Ethereum. What does this data show now? In the tokenized US stock track, Solana has quietly taken a big slice of the cake. The reason is simple—fast, cheap, and easy to use. If you want to trade US stocks on-chain but can't stand Ethereum's congestion and high gas fees, Solana is the best ready-made choice.
But does this mean we can blindly rush into SOL? Let's first look at the macro reality.
The Strait of Hormuz is still closed, oil prices are holding at $100, and the 30-year US Treasury yield has surged to 5.6%. In this environment, off-exchange funds simply dare not fully flow into high-risk assets. Bitcoin can only grind around 85,000, and the on-exchange market is full of leveraged mutual liquidation.
This $4.4 billion trading volume is a strong shot in the arm for the Solana ecosystem, making the long-term logic even stronger. But expecting a single chain's data to explode the entire market in the short term is unrealistic.
The core strategy now remains defensive:
For those holding spot positions, hold tight and don't get shaken out by this volatility;
For those with empty positions, don't chase highs just because of good news; wait for a pullback to confirm support;
Contract traders are best off watching the show; in this macro squeeze and zero-sum game, sudden spikes can hit you hard.
Hold your USDT well, wait for the macro environment to ease a bit, then pick up cheap chips. Do you currently favor tokenized assets in the Solana ecosystem? 🤔👇$SOL 20x leverage yielded a 166% unrealized profit, this curve makes everyone envious! $AKE short position open at 0.03466, current price 0.03178, precisely catching the retreat phase of this AI small-cap coin wave. $ZEC
Recently, AKE experienced sharp rises and falls, with clear market maker control; after a long upper shadow at the high, a pullback began. Your short position opened at the emotional turning point, aligning with the real background of "profit-taking after a pump," using high leverage on the contract to amplify the downward momentum—very solid logic. $ETH
The key now is to secure profits. A 166% unrealized gain at 20x leverage can't withstand a reverse spike; it is recommended to immediately move the stop loss up to the entry price for protection. Around the mark price of 0.03178, you can reduce your position, with the remainder targeting support at 0.028. Remember, shorting small-cap coins fears deep V-shaped recoveries the most; locking in profits is the only way to win in the end. #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 I have made no less than twenty trades with $ONDO.
I previously shorted near this position and got stopped out. That trade taught me one thing: ONDO's pullback range is basically within 1.5%, and if it exceeds that, the trend has most likely changed.
So this time I set my stop loss at 0.488, leaving enough room but not too far.
0.503, 100.38%.
The pits you've fallen into are your real advantage. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #贝森特：The rise in U.S. Treasury yields aligns with global trends
🚨 Under the high interest rate storm, Bitcoin's "resilience test"
The yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury briefly hit 5.33%, a new high since 2002, with the 30-year yield also reaching a peak not seen in over two decades. Treasury Secretary Yellen made it clear: this is a global repricing of borrowing costs, not a systemic sell-off of U.S. Treasuries by investors.
For $BTC, the core issue is not how high yields are, but why they are rising. Thielen, founder of 10x Research, pointed out that when yields rise due to Federal Reserve tightening, Bitcoin comes under pressure — as evidenced by BTC's 64% crash in 2022; but when yields are driven by concerns over fiscal deficits and term premiums, the logic is quite the opposite. Since the end of 2023, the 10-year yield has climbed 135 basis points, while Bitcoin has doubled in the same period.
Data also confirms this subtle relationship: the 90-day rolling correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and the 10-year yield is only about -0.17, nearly statistically "uncorrelated." What truly suppresses BTC's short-term price is bond market volatility, not the yield level itself.
When "risk-free returns" become sufficiently attractive, can Bitcoin withstand this stress test by relying on the "devaluation hedge" narrative? ₿📊The SAFE 1H chart confirms price action respecting an ascending parallel channel, printing repeated upper-wick rejections against the upper diagonal boundary near $0.1198. Contracting buy volume following the recent push confirms buyer exhaustion against heavy distribution. The preferred strategy is to enter a Short position near $0.1193–$0.1198 with a stop-loss parameter above $0.12307, targeting the lower channel support baseline at $0.10762 $SAFE
#OKXNOW：SeeWhat'sNext Account Position Divergence Radar｜Last 15 Minutes
$FET top accounts are more bullish, but position size is more bearish: account long-short ratio is 1.45, position ratio is 0.88; the difference in proportion between the two types of long positions has expanded by 3.6 percentage points. There are more bullish accounts, but a long position size advantage has not yet formed.Brothers, my read on this market wave is simple: First pressure, then potentially another push higher. I’m still mid-term bullish and slightly bullish short-term, but this is not the place to chase green candles. The rally has already heated up sentiment. Now the important question isn’t “How high can it go?” It’s: 👉 After a pullback, will buyers actually step back in? 🟠 $BTC — 86,000 IS MY LINE BTC moved from 83,884 → 86,794 and is now around 86,400. My bull/bear dividing line: 86,000 🟢 Abov今天继续来说“回购”专场，其实这个专场我在25年11月就讲过了，我当时也知道未来山寨想要跑出来，一定要有回购要么有etf，不然可能下轮就跑不出来了。 原因其实也很简单，主要是2022-2025这波周期的山寨季并没有跑出来，很多山寨的涨幅是不如大饼的。 那么目前新的一轮周期开始了，目前能跑出来的全都是有回购的项目，并且跑到顶端的都是有回购有etf这类的。 所以我们再来梳理下有哪些项目有回购机制且跑出来的。 首先，目前来看回购机制中最强机制就是自动链上回购销毁。 因为目前目前web3项目都是发行在链上，协议通过智能合约自动的将协议收入定期回购，是非常符合区块链精神的。 1.hype 目前这类项目有hyper，hyper吧90%的协议手续费用于回购，而hyper又是一个24H不停的赚钱机器，目前年营收超过10亿，所有市场一直有这么一个不停购买的“大户”，币价当然就蹭蹭蹭了。 目前hyper累计销毁13亿，日均销毁5万枚hyepr。 目前hype最高冲到了97，26年1月最低23，到目前已经翻了4倍，简直深不可测。 2.Pump 第二个链上自动回购的是pumBTC 4-hour chart lines: a standard ascending channel.
Swing lows 82566→83125→83861→84538 are gradually rising, swing highs 85604→87229 are moving up synchronously, the channel remains intact.
Current price is 86035, stuck in the upper-middle part of the channel:
Three layers of resistance above — the upper boundary of the channel, the 87.2-87.4K magnetic zone, and the September high at 87397. Do not chase before a breakout with volume.
Below is the ascending trendline (currently around 85076) and the previous high at 85604 turned support, the lifeline for bulls; breaking the channel would indicate deterioration.
Conclusion: The bullish structure is intact, but there is tough resistance above; wait for a breakout confirmed by volume; below, watch if the trendline holds.$MUBARAK's unrealized profit peaked at 150%, then dropped back to the break-even line within three hours.
The paper profit shrank from 150% to 10%, basically a wasted effort. I didn't watch the market during those three hours—not because of good mentality, but because I set a rule: don't watch if the basis hasn't changed.
Later it pulled up to 0.07456.
250.96%.
What I rely on is not mentality, but rules. Mentality can collapse, rules won't. $BTC $ETH #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 Price is back near the highs, but the real question is whether demand can keep absorbing supply at these levels. September brought strong ETF inflows. October has started positive, but the pace has cooled sharply. That makes this zone interesting. If buyers are serious, they need to prove it above resistance — not just push price into it. 🧠₿ What are you watching here: price action, ETF flows, or liquidity?The morning push in $ZEC felt less like a real breakout and more like one final move before another pullback. 📉
I’ve been holding this position for over 50 days, with the unrealized loss once reaching more than $3,500. At this point, if I can get back to breakeven, I’m willing to stay patient.
Taking the loss now would feel like throwing away months of hard work just to lock in that $3,500 loss.
I still believe I have a chance to recover this month.
#DailyOrbit #FedSeptemberMinutes The Bitcoin development team fixed a vulnerability.
This hole doesn't steal your keys, but it can still take your coins.
Strange, right?
The keys are in your hands, yet others can still move your coins?
Yes.
The problem lies in the signature.
When you make a transfer, you have to sign.
When signing, you think you are signing "to Zhang San".
But actually, you are signing "to the person in the 2nd position".
What if there is no 2nd person on the list?
Then what you signed is just air, and anyone can use it.
For example.
You signed a note: 100 units to the person in 2nd place in line.
When checked, if there is only 1 person in line, then this note is valid for anyone.
You signed it yourself, but it didn't bind to the person you intended to give to.
Who should be most worried?
Wallets, hardware wallets, offline signing tools.
They are supposed to help you clearly see what you are signing.
The patch has been applied, but only in the development version.
The official version does not have it yet.
That means many wallets still have this flaw.
So if you make a transfer recently,
every time you click "Confirm," are you seeing the translation provided by the tool?
If the translation is wrong, you won't know, and your coins might be gone, even though your private key was never taken.
So:
What exactly did you confirm when you pressed that confirm button?
Fortunately, Bitcoin Core will now block risky signature requests. After all the volatility, ZEC finally has a fundamental catalyst worth watching. 🟢 NU7 is now live on the public testnet, targeting a major reduction in block time toward 25 seconds. The next step? Testing. If the upgrade performs as expected, the community will then move toward a mainnet decision. Meanwhile, $ZEC is still trading around 21% below its recent high. That creates an interesting setup: Real protocol development + a heavily watched price level. 👀 The big question: Can NU7 become th[Public Chain Unlock Alert: Movement Confirms Precise Release of 165 Million MOVE Tokens on October 9]
The highly anticipated Move language emerging Layer-2 network Movement has today disclosed the first phase core unlock schedule for its native token MOVE. The team confirmed that on October 9, 165 million MOVE tokens will be selectively released to ecosystem incentives and early contributors. Ecosystem developers remind token holders to be aware of volatility risks in related liquidity pools on that day.📅 OKX CONFERENCE PREVIEW ≠ A POSITIVE PRICE SIGNAL OKX is set to host a global Product & Ecosystem Conference, but there’s an important point to keep in mind: The preview itself doesn’t mention any specific coin price or guaranteed market catalyst. The counterintuitive part is simple: an announcement does not automatically create buying pressure. It only means the team is preparing to take the stage. The key themes are: 🔹 Products 🔹 Trading 🔹 Payments And “payments” is probably the easiest aETH is stuck around 2720, neither rising nor falling. What really matters is not the price, but whether funds are quietly rotating.
Currently, ETH is about $2727, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $3.148 billion. The price is sideways but trading volume remains high. This kind of "high volume without price drop" is indeed worth attention, but volume alone cannot directly confirm institutional accumulation; it also requires confirmation from active buying, open interest, and capital flow.
Technically, EMA5/10/20 are concentrated around 2710–2720, with moving averages tightly aligned, indicating short-term volatility is compressing and a turning point may be approaching. The key support below is $2680; if held, the bullish structure remains. Once effectively broken, the consolidation logic needs to be reassessed.
The real resistance to break above is around $2800. Only a volume-backed breakout and stabilization there will make $3000 a more discussable target. Market optimistic targets can be referenced, but target prices are not a basis for trading.
Right now, ETH seems to be waiting for a directional choice rather than confirming a takeoff.
Watch $2680 for defense, $2800 for breakout, and $3000 for trend. What truly determines the next phase of the market is whether price, volume, and capital all give answers simultaneously. $BTC #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 Just woke up
Saw PONS pumping
I want to talk a bit
About the PONS buyback issue
If you are an old crypto player
You know buybacks have many tricks
A few simple words about buybacks:
1: Source of buyback funds, if it's from your own USDT, ETH assets, then it's a real buyback; if it's using your own issued worthless tokens to buy back your own coin, that doesn't count as a buyback at all.
2: Whose coins are being bought back? Taking PONS as an example, are they buying back tokens locked by the project team, or tokens in the project team's wallet, or tokens circulating among retail holders in the market? If they buy back circulating tokens, then the buyback is meaningful; if they only shuffle the project team's own tokens, it's just moving eggs from one basket to another, just a formality.
3: Where do the tokens go after buyback? Are they sent to a burn address, or stored in a separate wallet? Only sending to a burn address counts as an effective buyback; if just stored in another wallet, at most it creates a "big buyer" out of thin air, who could turn into selling pressure at any time.
4: Is the buyback executed automatically by contract, or manually by the project team? Manual buybacks can stop anytime, so they don't mean much. PONS belongs to this kind, not hardcoded into the contract; now the project looks good and uses this as marketing, but if the project fails someday, who knows what will happen.
Even if it's judged a real buyback, will the token necessarily rise?
If a protocol itself doesn't make money, with only $1000 daily fees and only 1% of income used for buybacks, to me that's a joke. $PONS $BTC
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要
#OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！
#Solana代币化股票9月交易量突破44亿美元 $BTC is fucking sideways again, it's giving me high blood pressure.
All day long, it neither rises nor falls, just grinds here. Who is it grinding against? Grinding against people like me who have positions, until you can't help but make a move.
I'm too familiar with this dog trader's trick: first make you feel stable, then jab you with a needle to shake you down, wait for you to sell, then pull it up. I got played like this last month, and thinking about it still makes me itch.
To be clear, at this position, no one wants to put money in first; bulls fear catching the knife, bears fear being liquidated. The trading volume is like no one has eaten, no one moves. Now it's not about vision, it's about whether your ass can sit still.
I'm not moving. The only advantage of those who have suffered losses badly is: thick skin. $BTC 10.5 Monday Sister San's personal view:
Currently, my judgment on $BTC and $ETH is very straightforward: short on the rebound, BTC's upper limit is seen at 87,000, ETH's upper limit is seen at 2800. Why so certain? First, US Treasury yields are still high, any positive news is quickly swallowed; oil prices haven't truly come down. What we really need to guard against is not the crypto market's own negative factors, but US Treasury yields breaking higher again. Second, ETF funds are clearly retreating, no one is willing to buy at high levels. ETH is weaker than BTC, indicating more cautious capital. Next, we only watch if BTC can hold 85,000 and ETH can hold 2700. If they can't hold, the bears continue; even if they hold, it's just a rebound. In the current state, I still stand bearish.
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要 #霍尔木兹仍未开放，OPEC+维持11月产量不变
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 📊 “U.S. Treasury Yields Are Rising With the Global Trend” — But Does That Really Ease the Pressure? Bessent’s point is that the rise in U.S. Treasury yields isn’t happening in isolation. Bond markets in other major economies are also being repriced, making this part of a broader global trend. That explanation makes sense. But honestly, it doesn’t make the financing pressure feel any lighter. If only U.S. rates were rising, companies and investors could at least compare borrowing costs across diWatching DOGE on-chain data on the subway: active addresses plummet, so why do I feel more reassured?
This morning on the crowded subway, one hand holding the handrail, the other scrolling on my phone, a set of on-chain data immediately woke me up:
In 2026, Dogecoin's daily active addresses averaged about 46,700, down 41% year-over-year, hitting a new low since 2017. At first glance, it made me uneasy; Dogecoin's price was extremely low in 2017, yet now the active addresses are even fewer than back then.
But after carefully examining the report, the logic is completely different from the surface. Data shows Dogecoin's mining difficulty has increased about 7 times compared to early 2022, with more miners contributing hash power to protect the network. Although user addresses have decreased, the network's security foundation is actually stronger.
Another key detail: 87.5% of DOGE transfers on-chain are essentially change transactions generated by the UTXO mechanism, automatically returning balance to oneself by the system, not real asset transfers between users. Many of the so-called "on-chain activities" are just protocol-generated backend operations, not genuine turnover.
A decline in active addresses does not mean consensus collapse. It is more likely that many holders have bought in and chosen to hold long-term without frequent transfers. People buy and just hold, living their normal work lives without constant trading.
The subway arrived, I hurriedly put away my phone, but felt more reassured. It seems I'm not the only one choosing to hold steady.
#DOGE #Meme币 #链上数据 #反身性理论#OKXNOW直播：就在明天，速来预约！ Al-Zubab changes hands: Yemen government forces seize the "zipper head" of the Red Sea west coast, creating a crack in the Houthi coastal blockade
Military sources confirm: After clashes with Houthi forces, Yemen government troops control most of the Al-Zubab area on the Red Sea west coast. The name may seem insignificant, but the location is critical—it is stuck in the coastal corridor north of Mocha and south of Hodeidah, serving as the midsection buffer of the Houthi "Mocha–Perim Island–Hodeidah" entire coastline.
The battle situation in three sentences:
Houthis retreat half a step: the southern flank buffer is lost, Mocha’s supply and the artillery position firing on Taiz are pried open;
Saudi-led coalition catches a breather: pressure on Red Sea merchant ships, Aramco facilities, and the Jeddah–Sana’a humanitarian corridor slightly eases, but Houthi drone/ballistic missile retaliation usually lags by 48 hours;
Yemen government forces shouldn’t count it as a real victory: controlling "most of the area" ≠ complete clearance, ridges, villages, and tunnels remain in Houthi hands, and the old Yemen war script is "plant flags by day, get sniped at night."
The real variable isn’t infantry, but air support + tribal defections: tribes around Al-Zubab are wavering, Saudi Arabia provides fuel, ammunition, and satellite imagery, enabling government forces to advance; Houthi defense relies on mountain rockets + coastal radar + fast boats sealing off Perim Island.
In plain terms:
Al-Zubab is not just a place name, it’s the zipper head of the Red Sea west coast—zip it up and the Houthis struggle, unzip it and Saudi smiles, caught in the middle are fishermen and grain transport trucks. Maji's perpetual futures exposure has gone far beyond a normal leveraged trade. Total positions are around $147.1M, with overall leverage near 15.03x. The biggest concern is that available margin has reportedly fallen to zero, leaving virtually no extra buffer. Here’s the breakdown: $ETH — The biggest risk ETH makes up roughly $98.47M, with 36,600 ETH at an average entry of $2,688.92. Current unrealized profit is only around $123K, while funding fees have already reached approximately $1.2265M. BTC has risen again, but this surge clearly feels a bit shaky. The divergence in funds is sounding the alarm!
Last week, institutions were still buying wildly with 2.39 billion, but this week it shrank directly to 83 million. On Wednesday, 149 million flowed out, on Thursday 103 million flowed back in, and on Friday only 31.7 million remained. In and out, the net buying power is almost zero.
ETH is even worse, with funds retreating for three consecutive days, totaling about 118 million. SOL is also bleeding, with external funds retreating.
Prices are strengthening, but funds are flowing out. This kind of divergence often signals that intense volatility is coming. Without new ammunition from institutions, it will be difficult for BTC to firmly hold above 87,200 in one go; more realistically, there will be repeated tugging at the high levels.
To speak frankly, don’t be fooled by the short-term red and green $BTC $ETH #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 $BTC current price is approximately in the range of 85,800 to 86,300 USD, with an intraday high surpassing 86,000 USD and a 24-hour increase of nearly 1.5%.
The daily moving averages maintain a bullish alignment, with a medium to long-term trend leaning bullish, but the MACD red bars are shrinking, indicating a weakening bullish momentum. The first resistance level above is near 87,380 USD, while the key support on the downside is at the 84,500 USD retracement level.
Currently, there is 4.35 billion USD in long position leverage at the top; it is not recommended to heavily chase the price before effectively breaking the previous high. Priority should be given to controlling positions and managing range-bound fluctuations, while being cautious of spike risks caused by liquidity shortages during the long holiday.
#本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要