Orbit Post Sitemap
$ETH Ethereum shows abnormal movement, with validator exit queue surging 392% month-on-month, about 850,000 ETH queued for unlocking, with a waiting time close to 15 days.
The trigger comes from the MetaMask Staking security incident, nearly 17,000 validators initiated preventive exits, involving about 523,000 ETH.
But this does not mean these coins will be dumped immediately; due to protocol rate limits, selling pressure will be spread over time.
Key observation around October 7: after this batch of related exits is completed, whether the queue number can fall back is a signal of whether selling pressure is easing.
Is it merely a technical operation caused by the security incident, or profit-taking by funds? On-chain data in the coming days needs close monitoring.
(For market observation only, not investment advice)
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #Muse加速扩张，MetaAI投入或迎来变现 #以太坊验证者退出队列增392%Zcash spot ETF crashed this week: a net outflow of $93.56 million in a single week.
September was still the darling after listing, once attracting $271 million, with asset management products holding about 3.5% of the total ZEC supply. Last week, funds turned around and fled, with the scale shrinking from $980 million to $751 million. Simply put, the rise was too rapid; ZEC surged 254% in Q3, and institutions cashed out after making enough profit. The key is to see whether redemptions narrow and if the price can stabilize. The ETF listing is a milestone; having both inflows and outflows is healthy. $ZECI feel that if 🐶 Whale continues to push the price up, it will return to 0.0065. If it doesn't reach that, I have set a stop loss. After 7 days of unlocking, there will definitely be a large volume of selling. Better to start building a position 6 days in advance.Why is $CORE called a scam?
Many people define CORE as a "sophisticated packaging scam." It is not a direct exit scam or Ponzi scheme, but it has very strong harvesting attributes, which is a consensus within the community. First, its biggest problem is the false Bitcoin hashrate narrative. It promotes reliance on BTC hashrate and the strongest decentralized public chain, but in reality, it is purely conceptual packaging with no substantial binding to the Bitcoin security system, making it a typical storytelling pump-and-dump.
Secondly, the token mechanism is extremely draining, with a huge total supply and an 81-year long-term continuous unlocking and issuance, meaning the market always faces a constant stream of selling pressure, causing retail investors to be trapped long-term.
More critically, the project team's credibility has collapsed. There was a major code vulnerability exposed, hackers minted a massive amount of excess tokens, exchanges collectively suspended transfers and urgently performed a hard fork to save the market, exposing extremely unstable underlying technology. At the same time, the team’s large token holdings are opaque; they once pledged huge amounts of tokens to cash out loans, posing a constant risk of concentrated dumping.
Its ecosystem is extremely hollow, with almost no real-world applications or on-chain revenue. The price is entirely supported by hype and new retail investors buying in. All price increases are driven by capital speculation, and once the market weakens, it continuously declines, trapping countless people.
In summary: CORE is a heavily packaged, weak technology, strong unlocking, pure speculation project with no long-term value. It relies solely on positive hype to harvest retail investors, which is the core reason the entire network recognizes it as essentially a scam. $CORE Hard Fork: 6 Seconds Faster, Trust Lost
The Hermes hard fork compresses the final confirmation of on-chain CORE transactions to 6 seconds, addressing the previous pain point of pre-confirmations being prone to rollback. The payment experience is visibly faster, and the node and staking mechanisms have also been optimized. Many regard this upgrade as a milestone for BTCFi, but the market overlooks the trust concerns behind the speed improvement.
The hard fork is merely a protocol performance optimization and does not change the token release rules. The continuous block reward inflation since 1981 remains unchanged, and the foundation and validator nodes still hold large amounts of tokens exerting selling pressure. BTC's computing power only protects the ledger against double-spending; smart contract vulnerabilities and hacker risks cannot be eliminated by this upgrade.
More critically, market expectations are at stake. The previous promotion of "Bitcoin-level security + sub-second transactions" led to conceptual misunderstandings among many investors. This hard fork fulfills the speed promise but fails to deliver on the narrative of ecosystem implementation and large-scale merchant adoption.
From the perspective of reflexivity theory: the market expected a full ecosystem explosion but only got a speed boost. Only the underlying performance was optimized, without solving the core issues of token distribution, user base, and commercialization. The speed improved by 6 seconds, but if overly high expectations continue to be unmet, it will erode the market's long-term trust.Tonight BTC is at 85,174, up +0.4% in 24 hours, with a high of 85,428. The three brothers are all in the green: ETH 2,697 (+0.61%), SOL 121.49 (+1.66%), with SOL gaining the most enthusiastically. The fee rates are interesting: BTC +0.0017%, ETH +0.0033%, SOL 0.01%. All positive, no one is complaining about costs anymore. But don’t get too happy too soon — that 0.01% for SOL is just the baseline; the bulls are only paying "normal interest," not bidding up prices. In plain terms: people are willing to hold, no one is chasing. OI is 28,377 BTC (2.42 billion U), basically unchanged from yesterday. Price rose but no new positions were added; that’s the whole story tonight. Let’s speculate: this kind of slow rise without adding positions likely means a sharp rise would be a fakeout, while a sharp drop might actually offer opportunity. The falsification condition is set: if the fee rates keep rising for 3 consecutive days and OI breaks 30,000 BTC and continues upward, then the "slow grind" judgment is wrong, and I’ll admit it in a post. With this kind of market tonight, do you hold back or can’t resist taking a shot?Conclusion first: A 7% drop in 24 hours (0.3693→0.3428), but the real focus isn't the drop percentage, it's the 4H candle at 10-03 20:00 — a single volume of 16.17 million contracts, 3.8 times the previous 4.29 million, and 4.4 times the average of the previous 6 candles, with a high pulled up to 0.3693. A typical high-volume long upper shadow.
Then look at the highs of the following 6 4H candles: 0.3566→0.3486→0.3527→0.3474→0.3449→0.3433, each one lower or equal to the previous, none surpassing 0.3693. Volume shrinks in sync: 289→179→316→321→183→103 (million contracts). High volume at the top, shrinking volume at the bottom, and progressively lower highs — this is the full path of the main force handing chips over to chasing retail investors, not a shakeout.
24-hour volume is about $24M, and the price has returned near the opening price of that high-volume candle. Meaning those who chased in at 10-03 20:00 are still down 5-7% on paper, with 6 4H candles not providing relief.
The practical significance of this K-line pattern: high-volume long upper shadow + progressively lower subsequent highs + stepwise shrinking volume, 99% indicates a distribution structure, not a "healthy correction." Recognizing this can save you from chasing a high.
Now at the 0.343 level, 0.345 is the key boundary — if it doesn't hold, look to the 0.330 platform. Do you think 0.345 can hold? $KAITO $CORE Big bro Maji's moves these days are simply legendary!
Precisely escaped the top at a high position, boldly entered at a low position, with total exposure bouncing back and forth between 141 million and 165 million. This wave's rhythm is definitely worth reviewing 📊
$BTC
Initially held 536 coins, with a slight loss, then decisively reduced to 369 coins, perfectly escaping the top.
After the market warmed up, made a big buy back to 546 coins, then reduced again to 405 coins to realize profits.
Latest holding is 378 coins, average holding price 84,700, liquidation price 66,000, the long-short rhythm is very well timed.
$ETH
Latest holding is 36,500 coins, average holding price 2688, liquidation price 2500, but the funding fee is a bit risky, reaching 1.23 million USD.
It would be great if one day he could come to $CORE to short a bit 😅😅😅
#The Federal Reserve and European Central Bank will release September meeting minutes #BTC spot ETF inflows return, ETH funding continues outflow #Besenet: US Treasury yields rising aligns with global trends I was waiting for a meaningful pullback, but ETH has continued grinding higher without giving bears much breathing room. When price refuses to retrace, sometimes the best move is simply to respect the trend instead of fighting it. The daily chart is becoming increasingly compressed, with roughly 8 sessions of narrow candles and long wicks. That kind of price action often signals a battle between buyers and sellers and can precede a larger expansion. 📊 My current view: I’m not aggressively beari$BNB Damn! BNB's shakeout this round is really fierce 😂 How many times has the dog trader been grinding back and forth around the 788 level? The K-line is full of upper and lower shadows, purely a capital game. Don't fomo, this market is all about who has the strongest nerves. I'm placing an order around 788.3 to catch some points, stop loss at 775; if it breaks, I'll accept it. The target is first set at 810, then reduce half the position. What do you guys think? 👇👇👇
The above is just my personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrency is highly volatile, please make decisions cautiously, profits and losses are your own responsibility.$ZEC, short positions can be considered. The bulls have a floating profit of over 66 million, but only 42% of traders are truly profitable. In contrast, the bears, although overall floating a loss of 3.92 million, have a profitability rate of 58%.
The data is quite misleading: the bulls are a few large whales taking profits, while most retail investors are trapped; the majority of bears are profitable, but a few large orders drag down the overall profit and loss.
Profitable whales may take profits and exit at any time, while trapped retail investors tend to sell to cut losses at any rebound. Both sides share a consensus of selling.
The bulls hold a large amount of chips waiting to escape, so do not blindly take over positions. I have already opened a heavy short position.
(For market observation only, not investment advice) #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 $CORE not rising for three months is just a scheme
$CORE a big drop is not scary, what’s scary is staying down for three months after the drop. That’s not a shakeout, it’s a grab for people.
BTC, ETH, SOL have also dropped, halved and halved again, but later they climbed back, even hitting new highs. Why? Back then there were fewer coins, strong consensus, teams really burning money, and ecosystems could be implemented. Now? Forty or fifty thousand coins, each wanting to be like Bitcoin, but there isn’t enough money on ten Earths to go around.
Don’t use “Bitcoin also dropped” to boost your confidence. If it drops and comes back, that’s a cycle; if it drops and plays dead, that’s a scheme. The project team doesn’t pump, only shouts faith, and honest people lose more the longer they hold.
It’s about time to exit. The market doesn’t sympathize with those who stubbornly hold on to death, it only rewards those who run fast.
#VoiceOfTrading: Your experience deserves to be heard
#GlobalHighInterestExpectationsRisingAgain
#EarningsObserver: Costco Q4 earnings report coming soon The $3K area carries a lot of historical supply. ETH previously traded around $3,250–$3,400 before the major sell-off toward roughly $1,700–$1,800. A lot of holders from that range may still be waiting for an opportunity to exit near break-even. That’s why I’m not convinced that $3,000 will simply fall in one move. My thinking is: 🔹 When ETH approaches heavy supply, trapped holders may sell into strength. 🔹 If leveraged longs become overcrowded, a sharp flush can provide liquidity. 🔹 If shortI opened a 40x short around $865, expecting the sideways structure to eventually break lower. Instead, the bulls completely flipped the setup and pushed ZEC toward $1,360+. Two positions are now sitting at roughly $1,700–$1,900 combined unrealized loss, with the account return deeply negative. The worst part wasn't the prediction — it was the position size and leverage. I expected another leg down after consolidation, but the market had other plans. Once ZEC reclaimed the $1,300 area, momentum aAs BTC dropped to $72.9K, the amount of supply held at a loss increased from 7.75M BTC to 8.33M BTC.
This suggests roughly 580K BTC was accumulated in the $72.9K–$76.6K range — a local top-heavy zone that is now fully underwater.
👉 This cohort is likely to add near-term sell pressure as holders reassess positions during the correction.I still remember when there was barely $8 left in the account and even 2x leverage felt dangerous. Now, after seeing some profits, I’ve started using 8x leverage and my risk tolerance has quietly increased. That’s the dangerous part of trading: a few winning trades can make you feel stronger than you actually are. The biggest problem right now is psychological. I’m holding a relatively large position, hesitating to cut it, and watching unrealized profit disappear instead of protecting it. The maNon-price conditions required for ETH currency premium
Currency premium is not a post-hoc explanation after a price increase, but rather that people are willing to continuously hold the same asset in various scenarios. For $ETH, this requires the mainnet to be secure and reliable, deep market liquidity, usability as Gas and collateral, predictable settlement rules, and easy transferability between different applications. No single function alone is sufficient to establish long-term holding demand.
The most easily overlooked is neutrality. If network rules are frequently changed for individual companies, validation rights are concentrated, or assets cannot be freely transferred at critical moments, no matter how many technical uses there are, the monetary attribute will be weakened. Conversely, open rules, multi-party validation, and broad composability allow different participants to accept the same settlement asset without needing to trust each other first, which is the foundation for a premium to potentially persist.
Prices will still be affected by macro liquidity and sentiment; currency premium does not eliminate volatility. Long-term judgment should examine whether collateral use is healthy, Gas demand is genuine, staking is decentralized, and governance can resist capture. Optimism about $ETH can be based on these conditions, but any sustained deterioration in these conditions should prompt holders to reassess rather than skipping analysis with the phrase "digital oil."If I have to bet on the direction of $BTC tonight, I would be more inclined to buy on dips, but definitely with proper stop-loss in place.📈
Why?
① Macro data is relatively friendly to risk assets
The latest non-farm payroll and unemployment rate data were weak, cooling market expectations for further Fed tightening. A cooling labor market means rate cut expectations may reheat, providing some support for high-volatility risk assets like BTC.
② US Treasury yields fall, risk appetite recovers
The 10-year US Treasury yield has declined, while US stocks remain relatively strong. With reduced pressure on the dollar and Treasury yields, capital acceptance of risk assets has improved, which is an important background for BTC’s short-term strength.
③ Technicals: Key level at $85,000
BTC previously broke through the $87,200–87,300 range but then pulled back. As long as support near $85,000 is not effectively broken, the short-term structure remains bullish.
The $82,800–$85,000 range can be seen as a previous consolidation zone; after breaking through, this area is likely to become a new chip exchange zone. As long as the pullback holds, it may actually be accumulating liquidity for the next upward move. Many people see a large single-day fluctuation and immediately assume the market is about to enter a one-sided trend, which is the most common misinterpretation nowadays. Sharp short-term rises and falls do not mean the range structure has failed. A single surge or dip can only be considered a test within the range, not a confirmed breakout signal. Based on the known market information, the BEAMX/USDT spot 24-hour range is between 0.002109 USDT and 0.00305 USDT, with the latest transaction price around 0.002655 USDT, and a 24-hour change of +25.354%. The price has completed a back-and-forth swing from low to high in a short time. The current position is in the middle of this fluctuation range, right in the middle ground of the bulls and bears battle, with possibilities for both upward and downward paths. The current core divergence is which side of the range—the upper or lower edge—will be effectively broken first. These two scenarios need to be viewed separately. If the price continues to hold near the upper edge of the range at 0.00305 USDT and forms continuous K-line confirmations, it will open up space for upward exploration; conversely, if it falls back again and continues to break below the lower edge near 0.002109 USDT, it means the current range support has failed and another directional market will begin. However, neither of these two scenarios has materialized yet and remain hypotheses to be observed. During the waiting phase for a breakout signal, it is necessary to distinguish between known market data and unknown variables. What is known so far is only the price boundaries formed by transactions within the past 24 hours For me, it comes down to one thing: the same factor that can create ZEC’s strength can also become its biggest risk — regulation. $ZEC is now facing pressure from both regulatory uncertainty and stretched valuation. 🔴 Regulatory risk: The recent BG-related incident reportedly involved around 3.9M ZEC moving into a privacy pool, making the funds difficult to trace directly on-chain. That puts renewed attention on Zcash’s privacy model and whether it can maintain its “privacy + compliance” narrat🟠 $BTC Remains stable near 85K, with a current floating profit of about +589U, holding key positions, and the overall structure is currently relatively healthy. 🚀 $SOL remains the MVP in the account, with a cumulative gain close to +58%, clearly outperforming other positions and becoming the biggest profit source at present. 😵 💫 In contrast, $NEAR still has about -51% unrealized losses, continuously eroding previous profits, making it the most troublesome position right now. The current account status is clear: BTC is responsible for stabilizing, SOL is responsible for rallying, NEAR is responsible for creating pressure. Next, the focus remains on whether BTC can hold above 85K, while also monitoring Fed/ECB meeting minutes, US fiscal policy and Treasury yields, and changes in risk appetite brought by Tesla delivery data. 📌 The closer the market gets to key resistance, the more you need to protect your existing profits rather than blindly chasing highs #FedECBMeetingMinutes #BessentTreasuryYields #TeslaQ3Deliveries #BTC #SOL #NEAR #Crypto$VIRTUAL enters CoinGecko hot search, price up +7.5%
$VIRTUAL is currently at 0.852, up +7.5% in 24h, and has even made it into CoinGecko's hot search. I'm directly bullish — the script indicates an offensive phase, breadth 40/17, median price change 1.376%, risk_on with strong coins pulling back to provide entry points.
Daily structure is flawless, MA7 is above MA30 (crossed above on day 10), MACD golden cross above zero line for 13 days, RSI at 58.6 not overheated. Volume supports the move, 24h trading volume 8,370,535 USDT, volume ratio 1.311, volume expansion confirms upward attack rather than a low-volume bull trap.
Derivatives side is calm, funding rate 5e-05 neutral, long-short account ratio 1.3004, open interest compared to 09-28 archived -3.57%, leverage hasn't surged in.
Resistance above: 0.8752 (24h high)
Support below: 0.7388 (4h SAR)
30-day +29.24%, range position 0.933, strong consolidation at high levels, don't exit blindly. Strategy is straightforward — enter near current price 0.852, cut losses if it breaks below 0.7388, let profits run if it breaks above 0.8752. Like and follow, I'll alert you first when the market moves.
$VIRTUAL $BTC$TRUMP current price is 2.05, dropped from 83 dollars to now, 98% gone, really a silent drop like pulling down your pants and farting
A typical meme ending, I wish $USELESS meme could drop like this too, don't ask why, I've been stuck for over a month, losing badly
Yellow hair resistance levels: 2.12 is the short-term pivot, if it can't hold, it stays weak, then 2.25, it surged up then dropped back, trapping a bunch of people, 2.50 is the iron top in September, no volume no hope, really trash, if I were Trump I'd just enjoy with the heavens, first pull up 50🔪
Support levels: 2.00 round number, already testing tonight, if broken look at 1.86, break again and it's 1.82 September low, if this level can't hold, below will directly see 1.4
Catalyst is clear: November 22 third token holders' dinner, November 12 lock-up, last two times it pumped then dumped, will this time be different??
My view: no faith in meme coins, don't buy if 2.00 breaks, talk about rebound only if it stands above 2.25 $BTC ETF is still experiencing net outflows currently. During these sideways days, it is slowly climbing. At the moment, no clear major direction is visible.
It's better not to hold heavy positions or try to bet on direction. Use small positions and set proper stop losses.
Even if it rallies now, selling pressure remains very obvious. I feel it will likely stay in a consolidation range for a short time.
Suitable for short-term trading to capitalize on volatility.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 According to MEFAI on-chain data tracking, the 15,000 BTC held by SAFU went through a period that 🔸 tested patience: out of 235 days, 87 days were below 🔸 cost price, 77 of which were underwater, spanning from June to August 🔸, with the account value at a minimum of about $879 million, but still above the $800 million margin limit 🔸. More importantly: 0 BTC were transferred out. Now, the value of this BTC holding has rebounded to about $1.28 billion. 💰 What truly deserves attention is not just how much the price has risen, but that during prolonged pressure, holders have remained unshaken by short-term fluctuations. Entering the market depends on luck, holding depends on faith, and getting through cycles depends on discipline. 🟧 Stay SAFU. #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #SAFU #OnChain #BTCWhale$ZEC perpetual 50x long position, opened at 1317.91, now at 1339.81, floating profit +83.08%.
The logic is very simple: the 1318 whole number support was tested three times without breaking, volume increased, and the bottom pattern is obvious. Finally waited for a bullish candlestick to rise, going long. 50x leverage, stop loss at 1300. The trend is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Moved stop loss up to 1325 to lock in profits. If volume breaks above 1350, can hold a bit longer.
$BTC $ETH #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 🚨 G7 IS ABOUT TO DROP A 100M-BARREL OIL BOMB — BUT HERE’S WHAT THE MARKET MAY BE MISSING.
The G7’s potential release of up to 100 million barrels isn’t simply about “saving oil prices.”
It’s about buying time. ⏳
As US-Iran tensions keep the Strait of Hormuz risk elevated, any Brent spike could fuel inflation fears and recession expectations.
📉 In the short term, strategic reserve releases could cool the panic premium.#DailyOrbit Zcash ($ZEC) has moved its upcoming NU7 network upgrade into public Testnet testing with the release of Zebra 7.0.0-rc.0, the first release candidate for the upgrade. NU7 is expected to activate on Testnet around October 6 at block 4,465,026. The upgrade targets 25-second blocks, introduces a new network sustainability mechanism, and adds additional limits for shielded transactions. Mainnet activation has not yet been set. #ZEC #Zcash #Crypto #Orbit #OKXOrbit$ENA perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.23547, currently at 0.24056, floating profit +108.08%.
I've actually been watching this position for quite a while. The 0.235 level was repeatedly tested but never broken; every time it approached this area, there was buying support. After confirming the bottom was valid, I decisively went long with a bullish candle. Using 50x leverage, the position size was pushed to the extreme.
Currently floating profit is +108.08%, and the trailing stop loss has been moved up to 0.238. Not greedy, locking in profits first.
$ETH $ZEC #贝森特：美债收益率上升符合全球趋势 $BTC 58%: Core account base holdings, continuously supported by institutional funds, with strong resistance to price drops during major market declines, used to withstand sudden systemic market drawdowns.
$ETH 27%: Benefits from staking yield and dividends from real asset tokenization, stable on-chain returns help smooth out account net value fluctuations.
$OKB 10%: Small position allocated to platform tokens, gaining from platform rights and deflationary benefits, speculating on market opportunities independent of the broader market, managing risks from volatility.
Stablecoins 5%: Holding idle ammunition, waiting for a deep market pullback to seize low entry opportunities. #Mainstream coins oscillate at high levels, awaiting directional choice
#美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 What deserves the most attention about $SAND now is not whether it has a whale, but what the chip structure actually means.
From the on-chain address distribution, the top ten addresses collectively hold about 64% to 73% of the circulating chips, with the largest single address accounting for about 35% to 37%. This concentration is indeed quite high, so I would define $SAND as having a medium to high level of address concentration risk.
But it should be noted: address concentration ≠ necessarily human manipulation.
Projects like $LAB and $BEAT previously showed obvious characteristics of low liquidity, high control, and being easily manipulated by sudden capital moves, but $SAND does not fully exhibit the same traits.
After all, The Sandbox behind $SAND is already a well-established metaverse project, with strong brand recognition and historical market influence, and most of the token unlocks have been completed. Compared to newly launched small coins with highly concentrated chips and extremely poor liquidity, there is a clear difference in fundamentals and market maturity.
So my judgment is:
$SAND indeed has a relatively high risk of chip concentration, but there is no need to directly classify it as a "highly controlled coin" for now.
What actually makes me more cautious is the capital attraction of the sector itself.
In the past, when the market was hyping metaverse and GameFi, projects like $SAND and $MANA were the core narratives; but now, market funds are more inclined towards AI, RWA, payments, stablecoins, and institutional financial infrastructure, among others $ETH perpetual 100x long position, opened at 2679.01, now at 2702.09, floating profit +86.15%.
After stabilizing around 2680, a big bullish candle directly pushed through resistance, so I followed the momentum to go long, setting stop loss below 2650. The 100x leverage position was very small, the trend was much stronger than expected, it took off directly, the percentage nearly doubled quickly!
Moved the stop loss up to 2690, now watching if 2720 can be broken.
$BTC $SOL #BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 After BTC regained strength, smaller coins actually make it easier to distinguish real strength from fake: OKB remains stable around 120, HYPE has bounced back to 90 USD, but DOGE is still hovering near 0.093. The overall market has given a tailwind; those who still can't reclaim resistance levels are more worth watching than those who just rise quickly.
#BTCStrengthSmallCoinsNoBroadRise
#FundsContinueToFilterDirection
$OKB is currently around 120.6, basically sideways in the past 24 hours, with 119–120 still seen as the first support; upward resistance remains at 121–123, and only after truly stabilizing above 123 will there be a chance to test 125–126 again. OKB now looks more like a high-level consolidation, lacking a real volume breakout.
$HYPE is currently about 89.9, slightly up in the past 24 hours, with 88–89 reestablished as the first defense; upward, 90–91 is the initial breakout to watch, and only after firmly standing back above 92 will there be a chance to continue recovering to 94–95. Compared to the historical high of 98.04, it is still in a phase of digesting high-level chips.
$DOGE is currently about 0.0927, with 0.09–0.091 continuing as the first support; above, 0.095 is the first target, and only after truly stabilizing above 0.10 will Meme funds be considered to have re-entered an offensive stance.
This lineup: OKB waits for 123, HYPE waits for 92, DOGE waits for 0.10. Coins that have not kept up despite the market rise now need to prove themselves more.After PONS dropped this time, I even felt a bit reluctant to open the K-line chart yesterday 😂
Watching it oscillate between 0.4 and 0.5 every day is really torturing myself. So I simply changed my perspective: instead of looking at the coin price, I checked whether there is real money flowing into this project.
Upon checking, I actually found that PONS's financial data is not as bad as imagined.
According to DefiLlama's current data, PONS's DEX trading volume in the past 30 days reached about $2.15 billion.
More importantly, the protocol's cumulative revenue in Q3 was about $183 million, with final retained earnings around $33.64 million, and net earnings corresponding to token holders about $20.19 million.
According to PONS V1's mechanism, about 80% of the protocol's revenue is used to repurchase and burn PONS.
This is actually a point I am paying more attention to now.
Many Meme coins or Launchpad projects, once their price drops, the biggest fear is not the drop itself, but the loss of hype → shrinking trading volume → declining fees → zero income, ending up only with constant talk of "ecosystem is under construction."
But so far, PONS has at least not reached that stage.
In the last market cycle, it indeed accumulated considerable trading volume and fee income. Looking at Q3 alone, the repurchase and burn scale corresponding to protocol revenue already exceeded $20 million.
Of course, we can't just copy Q3's good data directly to Q4. Writing
$CC The biggest problem is the constant selling pressure. New tokens are minted every day, while the burn rate isn’t keeping up. If this imbalance continues, the circulating supply keeps expanding, creating persistent downward pressure on the price. The key is whether network activity can drive enough burns to offset the ongoing emissions.
This wording is more precise because CC uses a burn-and-mint model, #DailyOrbit In this market, survival is the most important thing. Making money with high leverage is the process; liquidation is the outcome.$HYPE perpetual 50x long position, opened at 87.893, now at 90.282, floating profit +135.90%.
The logic is very simple: the 87 integer level was tested three times without breaking, volume increased, and the bottom characteristics are obvious. Finally waited for a bullish candlestick to rise, going long. 50x leverage, stop loss at 86.5. The trend is very smooth, no chance for a pullback.
Trailing stop moved up to 89 to lock in profits. If volume breaks above 92, can hold a bit longer.
$BTC $ZEC #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 【Can DOGE reach $0.10 in October? The market is voting with real money】
Just saw a pretty interesting market on Polymarket:
"Can Dogecoin $DOGE hit $0.10 in October?"
Currently, the market's bet on "yes" has reached 77%, while only about 16% bet on it falling below $0.05.
When I saw this data, I even paused my chopsticks while eating.
The reason is not how exaggerated the 77% figure is, but that behind every judgment here, there is real money.
It's costless to be bullish or bearish in words, but when opinions turn into bets, market sentiment becomes more genuine.
Of course, Polymarket's probabilities do not guarantee DOGE will follow the majority's expectations. Prediction markets can also be influenced by sentiment, liquidity, and short-term events, and even experience "the majority being wrong together."
But at least this data shows one thing:
Market participants still hold quite high expectations for DOGE to challenge $0.10 again in October.
Moreover, DOGE itself is a typical high-sentiment asset. Once BTC maintains strength and market risk appetite recovers, funds tend to flow more easily into such high-beta, highly watched legacy Meme coins. $PNT is about to open today. What I want to see most right now is not whether it can pump 5x, but whether the $0.05 price can hold.
Pheasant Network's current IDO was sold at $0.05, with a total supply of 1 billion tokens. This round only sold 3 million tokens, raising $150,000, corresponding to an FDV of $50 million. Today also happens to be the TGE, and KuCoin directly gave it a World Premiere, with a Call Auction from 19:00 to 20:00 Beijing time, and the official PNT/USDT trading starts at 20:00.
My first reaction to this kind of new coin now is no longer "the launch exchange is good, let's rush in."
Instead, I first look at who wants to sell the most.
Because the IDO just ended yesterday, liquidity is immediately available today; the project's own airdrop page already shows PNT Claim, and they even designed a Deferred Claim option, allowing you to claim later or exchange for a higher one-time allocation.
This design actually reminds you: on the first day of listing, the pace of token release is far more important than the story.
I'll put aside the project's cross-chain, Intent, AI aspects for now, and focus on two things today — the $0.05 IDO cost line and the trading volume after opening.
If it pumps several times right away, I will most likely just watch and not chase.
After all, the one thing new coins do best is to make me feel like I missed out before the opening, and make me glad I didn't buy after the opening 😭Finally able to catch a breath 😂
A few days ago, $NEAR was getting crushed in the deep waters, but today the market warmed up, and I finally pulled it back from the ICU. Currently, the account is still "two profits and one loss," but my mindset is much more comfortable now.
$BTC｜Holding steady is victory
Average holding price 83,720, current price 85,680
Unrealized profit about 720U, return rate about 28%
BTC continues to hold above 85,000, profits are still expanding, defense levels are moving up accordingly, first securing profits before anything else.
$SOL｜Isolated margin MVP
Average holding price 116.8, current price 122.1
Unrealized profit about 180U, return rate close to 70%
When the market was unclear, I tried isolated margin with a small position as a test, unexpectedly it has become the strongest player in the account now.
$NEAR｜Finally starting to recover
Average holding price 4.82, current price 4.91
From a large unrealized loss a few days ago to basically back near cost now, this recovery was definitely not easy. The biggest question now is: after breaking even, should I continue holding?
📌 Key market focuses going forward:
#FederalReserve and EuropeanCentralBank meeting minutes
#BTC spot ETF funds flowing back
#ETH fund flows still weak
#VanEck optimistic about BTC market share continuing to rise
Market warming doesn’t mean risks disappear; securing profits first is more important than blindly chasing gains.Brothers, I really can't hold back this $PUMP!
I directly opened a 340,000 USDT short position, entry price around 0.00568, current price near 0.00628, with an unrealized loss exceeding 30,000 U.
PUMP has surged from about 0.0037 all the way to 0.0066, a nearly 9% increase in 24 hours. Every pullback is quickly absorbed by capital, the strength is undeniable.
But here’s the problem — it’s been rising for too long, and market sentiment is too unanimous.
Currently focusing on two key levels:
0.0066: Today’s high reached 0.006601; if it tries to break through again but fails effectively, it may form short-term resistance.
0.0060: If it breaks below this, the funds that chased the highs earlier might start to loosen, and the pullback speed could noticeably accelerate.
I’m not betting it’s definitely peaked, just wagering that this round of rally has entered a high sentiment phase, and the risk-reward ratio is starting to favor a correction.
Look at $SAND as well, up about 64% in 7 days, over 90% in 30 days, peaking at 0.08299, now oscillating repeatedly around 0.074–0.075. After continuous gains in strong assets, the biggest fear is the gradual weakening of momentum at high levels.
$ZEC is the same, previously peaking at 1695, now falling back near 1330, down about 16% in 7 days. The market will never guarantee perpetual gains just because it "rises strongly."🚨 $PUMP — I’M DONE WAITING. THE SHORT IS ON! 🔥
Brothers, I finally pulled the trigger.
💰 340,000 USDT short position on $PUMP 🎯 Entry: 0.0056785 📍 Current area: 0.00628 📈 24H High: 0.006601
$PUMP has been absolutely flying, climbing from around 0.0037 while every dip keeps getting bought.
I admit it — the strength is real.
BUT…
🔥 The longer the market believes “every dip is a buy,” the more dangerous the setup becomes.
Everyone is waiting for another green candle.#DailyOrbit DOGE has again hit $0.094, but this time the most interesting thing is not the rebound, but that "there’s a trap laid above first."
The latest data shows DOGE at about $0.0942, up approximately 1% in 24 hours. The real-time liquidation map shows that just about 0.5% above the current price, there are roughly $650,000 worth of short positions that could be liquidated; about 1.2% below, there are roughly $375,000 worth of long positions.
This means DOGE is now close to leverage trap zones on both sides.
Looking at the price, on October 2nd DOGE’s single-day trading volume reached $1.66 billion, with the lowest price hitting $0.0904; but it then bounced back near $0.094.
ETF funds have not accelerated noticeably either. On October 2nd, DOGE-related ETF funds remained basically flat, with only about $330,000 net inflow over the past week.
So the most important thing to watch for DOGE now is not "whether it can rise to $0.1."
Rather:
The longer it stays around $0.094, the easier it is for leverage to continue accumulating on both sides.
Look first at $0.0945–$0.098 above, and $0.092–$0.090 below.
Here comes the real kicker:
If DOGE suddenly surges in volume this time, the first thing to be triggered might not be the spot market, but leverage.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出 $BTC $DOGE !! 🐋🔥 Woke up and the dog whale left me a nice payday 😂 This wave was all about $SAND. Bought around $0.0642, now near $0.0738. Unrealized profit: +$24,800 Return: +44% Position: ~$185K The best part is that after reaching $0.0815, SAND didn’t collapse. It kept defending the $0.070–$0.072 area, showing buyers are still interested. Now it’s grinding around $0.074. If $0.070 holds, I’m still watching for another push toward $0.08. Meanwhile, $PUMP is still testing my patience. 😭 Bought around First, let's present the opposing view: Even if $NEAR's direction is correct, the current position may cause those following the trend to incur higher costs.
The current price is 4.973, about 6.70% away from the 1-hour support at 4.64, and about 0.95% away from the resistance at 5.02. Here, there is no shortage of directional speculation, but what is lacking is the sustainability after the price truly breaks through these boundaries.
$NEAR's direction is not ambiguous; the real challenge is whether the current position is still worth continuing to bet on the direction.
Both the 1-hour and 4-hour charts are relatively strong, with the current volume at 1.68 times the average volume of the previous 20 bars, indicating clear activity. Consistent direction does not equal unlimited space; the closer to key levels, the more important subsequent support becomes.
My observation line is very clear: regaining and holding above 5.02 means the short-term initiative is back; breaking below 4.64 means shifting focus to the 4-hour support at 4.59. If pressure continues above, the 4-hour resistance at 5.54 is only a distant reference for now, not a preset target.
To continuously track this segment, just remember 5.02 and 4.64. I will return in the next round to check if the market has overturned this judgment.
Between a consistent structure and limited space, which would you prioritize?
The market is volatile; the above is only a market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is from Coin Circle Bull.Don't take the last stab; the real profit is already in the structure.
Around October 4th, $SAND surged but volume gap appeared, and the buying pressure above couldn't continue, with persistent high-level selling pressure. I opened a short at 0.07589 with 50x leverage, not betting on sentiment, only trading the structural pullback under pressure.
Currently, the position has an unrealized profit of 98.16%, with a mark price of 0.0744, the short position is close to doubling.
However, after the rapid drop, the bearish momentum has largely dissipated, increasing the probability of a rebound repair; I will no longer chase shorts for now and will first observe if the resistance level can reform to suppress. $BTC $ETH #美联储与欧洲央行将公布9月会议纪要 Watching the market over the weekend, you can't just look at the color of the price changes. Even if it shows an increase, the feeling of holding can be completely different.
$NEAR has risen more than 120% in the past month, but it still slightly declined this week and rebounded about 4.4% today. I think what it needs most right now is to digest the expectations for the next phase of the market after the rapid rise earlier. Buyers who calculate returns based on the previous speed may easily lose patience if it slows down a bit. My judgment is that the stage performance is still outstanding, but the short-term has not returned to a continuous upward trend. New sustained buying is needed next.
#NEAR生态协议被盗380万美元资金全额追回
$ETH's movement around 2700 can make people anxious, but anxiety itself doesn't provide direction. For now, I won't take its stability as a signal that the entire market is ready to accelerate. If the rise starts to be continuous later and the pullback is restrained, it will still be timely to raise expectations. Right now, it feels more like waiting for a clear change.
#BTC现货ETF重回流入，ETH资金持续流出
There is a detail worth noting about $PENDLE: it was still around 2.47 at noon, dropped back to about 2.43 in the evening, yet the 24-hour increase is still over 3%. This is not contradictory; the 24-hour change compares to the same time yesterday, not noon today. So just looking at that percentage increase can easily make one think it has been continuously going up. I pay more attention to whether the actual price can be raised again. A good daily increase is one thing; whether it continues to strengthen afterward is another.Imagine this: in 2013, 801 $BTC were accumulated at a price of about $124–$411, then showed no significant movement for a long time. Thirteen years later, the unrealized gains from this token have now reached about $67.82 million 💰🔥. But the most interesting thing isn't this huge floating profit—the whale's first transfer after awakening was only 0.00050546 BTC, worth about $43 😂. From a massive holding of tens of millions of dollars to a transfer of $43 first—this might be the lowest-key way for the "sleeping whale" to start. 👀 The key is: is this transfer just a wallet test, or a signal before a large-scale fund movement? Old addresses start to become active, and the market tends to become more alert. The whale has moved, and on-chain capital flows deserve ongoing attention. #DailyOrbit #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #WhaleAlert #OnChain$ZEC is really starting to look a bit off this time?
From September 30 to October 2, there was a significant outflow of funds related to the Grayscale ZEC ETF, with holdings dropping from about $270 million to around $213 million, indicating a substantial short-term withdrawal.
What’s more noteworthy is that after the fund outflow, $ZEC immediately experienced a noticeable pullback.
Currently, the market also lacks new strong positive catalysts: when the overall market rises, ZEC struggles to keep up; when the market falls, it weakens in sync.
Is the privacy coin narrative cooling down? Or is it just short-term profit-taking?
If no new funds come in to take over, $ZEC may continue to face pressure.📉
#ZEC #PrivacyCoin #CryptoMarket #CapitalFlowDog whales, don’t you like to pump? 😭 Come on, keep pumping. My short is right here!! I opened this short around $0.00605. Now $PUMP is around $0.00642, with today’s high near $0.00675. The trend is still strong: 📈 7D: +18% 📈 30D: +43% 📈 90D: +270% But that’s exactly why I’m watching this level closely. $0.0067–$0.0070 is becoming the key zone. If bulls can break and hold above $0.007, I’ll admit defeat. 😂 But if price gets rejected again and drops back below $0.0062, things could get ugly