Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
0.35美元的PONS,你要抄底吗? 从0.004涨到0.97,240倍神话;现在0.35,跌了64%。日收入从600万掉到24万,降幅九成。你还在等反弹?这波到底是洗盘还是归零? 先看表面:7日跌三成,30日跌一半,24小时回撤6%-12%。市值2.4亿,排名120开外。合约成交远大于现货,价格全靠杠杆盘驱动。资金费年化11%,多头还在付钱给空头——人没散,但钱在跑。 第一件事:热度退潮,收入塌了。 9月初,Robinhood Chain meme狂热,单日发币2.5万个,平台日手续费冲到600万美元,周手续费一度超过Pump.fun。币安Alpha、币安永续、Kraken排队上线,Cumberland和Wintermute真金白银买入。市场喊它“新链发射台龙头”。 现在呢? 日收入掉到24万美元,降幅接近九成。链上激励结束,meme潮冷却,部分发射盘被质疑抽流动性。收入是发射台代币的命根子,不是KOL喊单。 没有新的收入拐点之前,合约利好打不回0.5。你还在等下一个meme神话?神话已经讲完了,现在讲的是事故。 第二件事:基本面干净,但定价锚是手续费。 PONS没有团队预留、没有投资人解锁、TGE即全流通,80%平台收入用于回购销毁,累计销毁约32%供应量。产品也简单:绑定曲线起步,毕业后进Uniswap v4,流动性锁定,平台不托管。 听起来很干净?对,但干净不等于值钱。 发射台代币的估值锚是手续费。峰值时它能排进全网协议手续费前列,现在日收入掉一个数量级,销毁速度跟着掉。币价从0.97回到0.35,是基本面降温,不是单纯洗盘。持仓集中度中等偏高,合约持仓/市值比高,单日波动10%是常态。 你拿一个收入塌了九成的发射台,去对标Pump.fun的巅峰?这不叫价值投资,这叫刻舟求剑。 第三件事:技术面是下降趋势,0.35只是横盘。 日线是9月高点之后的下降趋势,0.35不是反转,是下跌中继。 强支撑:0.333-0.337。24小时低点和7日低点重合,跌破容易加速。 近端支撑:0.345-0.350。现价就贴在这里,没有安全垫。 近端阻力:0.39-0.42。10月8日反抽高点和短期均线压制都在这,站不回去,反弹只是修复。 强阻力:0.50-0.54,再上面0.55-0.60前平台。 日线放量收在0.42上方,才有资格看0.50。4小时图上,0.33是需求反应位,但反抽还没吞掉0.39。结构是“跌完等确认”,不是右侧。 别在下跌趋势里找底,底是走出来的,不是猜出来的。 多空对决,你自己看 一边是: 全流通,无预留,回购销毁持续 币安永续上线,流动性好 团队提过社交交易、跟单、排行榜 累计销毁32%,供应缓慢下降 一边是: 日收入从600万掉到24万,降幅九成 热度退潮,meme冷却,抽流动性质疑 美联储加息到3.75%-4.00%,纪要偏鹰 BTC从8.6万回落,山寨跌得比BTC深 合约持仓/市值比高,多头拥挤,杠杆驱动 社交交易、跟单、排行榜?没落地之前,都是白皮书里的春药。 关键位置 上方阻力:0.39-0.42(站回去才叫修复)→ 0.50-0.54 → 0.55-0.60 下方支撑:0.345-0.350 → 0.333-0.337(破位加速)→ 0.28-0.30 操作策略 这是发射台代币,仓位必须小。单币不超过风险资金的2%-3%,杠杆不超过3倍。永续资金费持续为正,过夜多单成本不低。 短线多: 只做0.333-0.340回踩不破、且15分钟或1小时重新站上0.350的确认。止损0.328下方。第一目标0.385-0.390,第二目标0.42。盈亏比不到1:1.5就不做。 突破多: 4小时放量收在0.42上方,再看0.50-0.53。止损回到0.39下方。没放量的假突破不跟。 短线空: 0.39-0.42遇阻、量能跟不上时,轻仓做回落,止损0.435上方,目标0.35/0.335。顺日线趋势,但高波动品种,仓位照样要小。 波段: 中期只跟收入。日手续费重新回到百万美元级别、同时价格站稳0.42,才考虑把0.33-0.35当成阶段底部。收入继续萎缩而0.333日线收破,下一档看0.28-0.30,不抄。 PONS现在就像赌场里最后一桌没散的客人—— 灯还亮着,酒还开着,但庄家已经在数钱了。 发射台代币的命根子是手续费,不是KOL喊单。收入塌了,任何反弹都是逃命机会,不是上车机会。 0.35是中间价,不是底。你总想在发射台代币上找价值,就像在赌场里找爱情。 $BTC $ETH $PONS
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
NEAR at $4.8, are you chasing it? A month ago, no one wanted it at 2.45; after the ETF listing, it surged to 5.6 with the whole network shouting "100x AI public chain." Now it’s dropped back to 4.8, with a wave of liquidations in the last 24 hours. Just now, the daily chart shifted from parabolic to consolidation, and the 4.31 low was just bought back — is this move a "reverse pickup," or the start of the ETF bullish momentum running out? First glance: doubled in 30 days, but beaten down in 7 days. NEAR climbed from 2.45 all the way to 5.5-5.6, nearly doubling in 30 days. Then around October 8, it sharply dropped to a low of 4.31, now rebounding to about 4.8, with a 24-hour pullback of about 8%, market cap at 6.2 billion ranking 21st. The candlesticks tell you: daily RSI dropped from extreme overbought back to neutral 50, the 4.31 demand level reacted, but the rebound hasn’t reclaimed 5.0 — all technical indicators say one thing: the drop is done, but not confirmed. First thing: Was the ETF listing day the start or the end of the rally? In late September, Bitwise’s spot NEAR ETF (NRR) launched on NYSE Arca, the first US spot product directly holding NEAR, with a 0.75% management fee, nearly all holdings staked, and staking rewards included in NAV. Before listing, price accelerated from mid-2 dollars to above 5 dollars. After listing? It surged to 5.6, then dropped back to 4.31. This is the classic crypto script: good news lands, then a wave of selling off the latecomers. But don’t rush to blame. The ETF isn’t a meme; it’s a channel. The 0.75% fee plus staking rewards means institutions buying NEAR earn real interest — totally different logic from buying a meme with no cash flow. The sentiment on listing day is fake; the real data is in subsequent share volumes. The question isn’t whether the ETF works, but whether you thought about who was selling to you when you chased at 5.5. Second thing: The AI narrative isn’t just hype, but the market isn’t buying it now. Bitwise positions NEAR as the infrastructure for AI agent cross-chain trading, not just a concept — Intents cumulative volume has exceeded $30 billion, covering over 30 chains, with some fees starting buybacks from February 2026. In plain terms: NEAR is making real money. On-chain data isn’t bad either: post-sharding block time 600ms, finality 1.2s, staking yield 4.5%-5%, inflation cut in half from 2.5%, with a proposal in October to reduce it to 1.6%. TVL hit a high of 240 million in September, now down to 220 million — not a crash, but a capital retracement after rapid growth. But here’s the problem: ecosystem TVL is still small relative to market cap. 6.2 billion market cap with 220 million TVL is an unhealthy ratio for a public chain. The AI agent economy is still early; whether ETF inflows continue depends on future share data, not the fireworks on listing day. You believe the narrative; institutions look at data. Narratives can be hyped, data doesn’t lie. Third thing: Macro is draining liquidity; high-beta altcoins get hit first. Bitcoin fell from 86,000 in early October to 81,000-83,000, dominance 58%-60%. The Fed raised rates 25bps in September to 3.75%-4.00%, minutes hawkish. In this environment, leveraged longs are being liquidated en masse; NEAR, as a high-beta asset, took the brunt. On October 8, NEAR led altcoin declines, with clear long liquidations. When BTC sneezes, NEAR goes straight to ICU. This isn’t NEAR’s fault; it’s the fate of all high-beta altcoins — you’re the strongest on the way up, and the first to be carried out on the way down. Key level 4.8, battlefield both above and below. Support below: 4.45-4.50 (near term) → 4.31 (this round’s sharp low, strong support) → break looks at 4.00-4.10 → 3.90 previous platform Resistance above: 5.00-5.07 (if it can’t reclaim, rebound is just a correction) → 5.40-5.60 (October 8 supply zone + September high, strong resistance) → only a volume breakout qualifies to target 6.0-6.5 Bull vs bear, you decide. On one side: - The US’s first NEAR spot ETF is listed, institutional channel opened - Intents cumulative volume over $30 billion, real revenue + buyback mechanism - Inflation cut from 2.5% in half, possibly down to 1.6% - 30-day still nearly doubled, mid-term trend intact On the other side: - ETF listing price dropped from 5.6 to 4.31, real selling pressure after good news - Fed hawkish, rates 3.75%-4.00%, risk assets under pressure - Ecosystem TVL small relative to market cap, AI agent economy still early - Increased daily volume on down days, active selling not a quiet decline Trading strategy Aggressive short-term: If 4.35-4.50 support holds and 4-hour close reclaims 4.70-4.80, consider a second confirmation entry. Stop loss below 4.25, first target 5.00-5.07, second target 5.40. If risk/reward less than 1:1.5, skip it. Breakout long: Daily volume close above 5.20, then target 5.60, stop loss below 4.90. No volume, no fake breakout — fake breakouts are retail meat grinders. Short-term short: If 5.00-5.20 resistance holds and volume weakens, light short on pullback, stop loss above 5.35, target 4.50/4.35. Against mid-term trend, keep position small, don’t get emotional. Swing: Mid-term logic intact, but September already priced in a big move. More comfortable to wait for daily to form a platform between 4.3-5.0, rather than heavy position at 4.8 mid-price. If daily closes below 4.31, mid-term bulls pause, reassess at 4.0 or even 3.9. NEAR now is like SOL at the start of 2024 — ETF arrived, narrative in place, price first dumps to wash out the weak hands. Later SOL multiplied several times from bottom, but that retracement wiped out 90% of holders. Difference is: SOL had meme ecosystem supporting volume; NEAR now relies on Intents and AI narrative to support valuation. The story is more advanced, but it needs time to deliver. It’s not that NEAR has no value; it’s that you always rush in on ETF listing day, then get cut out on liquidation days. $BTC $ETH $NEAR

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!