Post

colword.std
colword.std
Show original
风险账单 $ETH 年化波动 40%,比 $BTC 的 29.5% 高出 10 个点,多担的风险全白挨——换来的不是多赚而是多亏一倍。夏普比率俩都是负的(-4.44 对 -6.08),说明这周做多两边都该面壁,但 $ETH 每担一单位风险亏的钱是 $BTC 的 1.4 倍,属于花钱买罪受还买了张站票。合约盘说句实话,这周吃到肉的只有做空的人,两边做多都是给空头抬轿子。 谁在撤退 资金面这次画风变了:六天累计两边都是净流出。$BTC 流走 2.41 亿美金,$ETH 才撤 2,460 万。看着 $BTC 跑得多,但结合价格看——$BTC 跌 2% 撤 2.41 亿,$ETH 跌 4% 才撤 2,460 万,说明 $BTC 多头跑得果断认赔干脆,$ETH 多头还赖在桌上不肯走。费率也印证这点:$BTC 10/06 就翻负(-0.001%),空头抢座位抢了三天;$ETH 拖到 10/08 才翻负(-0.0033%),多头被揍了五天终于扛不住。现货端机构的钱倒是没停,IBIT 光 9 月就吸 26.5 亿,10 月初又进 1.027 亿——不是没人要 $BTC,是合约盘自己在踩踏。
colword.std
colword.std
PK Day | Verdict on $BTC, $BTC wins three times in a row, not because it can fight but because it can endure The scoreboard flips to page 26, $BTC wins again, this time winning in the most boring way: who can endure the bear market better. In the seven-day window, $BTC returns -2.19%, $ETH -4.04%, nearly double the difference; maximum drawdown 4.5% vs. 6.1%; Sharpe ratio -4.44 vs. -6.08. The three consecutive wins rely on defense rather than offense, similar to that team known for "can't win but can wear down" — you can't score on my goal, I can't score on yours either, but I concede one less. $ETH paid 60% more rent this week (average fee rate 0.0024% vs. 0.0015%), suffered 40% more drawdown, and the money ran slower (net outflow 24.6 million vs. 241 million), losing on all three fronts, it's maddening. Two lines, one chart When the normalized curves are laid out, the story is just one line: before 10/04, the two brothers were still hand in hand, $BTC touched above 102, $ETH barely passed 100, then both slipped down. $BTC fell to 97.8 but still breathing, $ETH directly smashed below 96. The drawdown is more straightforward: $BTC's maximum drawdown was 4.5% throughout, $ETH took a one-shot 6.1%, on 10/07 alone it shaved off more than 4%. In the same bear market, $BTC at worst is weak-legged, $ETH is knee-shot.

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!