Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
1360美元的ZEC,你要追吗? 昨天还在1280,今天硬拉到1360,你盯着盘面心跳加速——但我要告诉你一个扎心的事实:这不是主升浪重启,这是箱体上沿的最后一口气。追进去的人,大概率要站岗。 先看表面:从1280弹回1360,散户又嗨了。 9月26日冲到1697,然后一路砸到10月3日的1271,今天先探1280再拉回1360。近7天跌了4%-15%,30天涨了15%,市值230亿排第十。24小时成交放大,日线收了一根下影反抽——所有群里都在喊:“ZEC要回来了,冲啊!” 但你冷静三秒: 从1697下来,已经回吐20%。1270-1370这个箱体,今天摸到的是上沿,不是底。 第一件事:NU7测试网提前了,但主网没签字,别提前高潮。 10月4日,NU7测试网在区块高度4465026提前激活。出块时间从75秒砍到25秒,60%手续费进储备,减半曲线保留。 听着很猛?我翻译成人话: 测试网 = 彩排,主网 = 正式演出 主网决定日:10月20日 目标激活日:11月5日 今天价格从1280拉回1360,没有一条新升级新闻。 这波反抽是箱体回补,不是叙事突破。 测试网提前是加分项,但没签字之前,别把它当成利好兑现。市场买的是预期,卖的是事实——10月20日那天,才是真正的生死判。 第二件事:ETF通道在,但增量没了。 灰度ZCSH拆分已经落地,规模此前约9亿美元。听起来很大? 但周一ZEC相关基金小额净流出,和BTC、ETH一起转弱。 这不是ZEC单独暴雷,是整个大盘在失血。 周一现货ETF净流出约9000万美元,BTC在8.6万中轴磨了两天,8.7万两次没过。 翻译成人话: ETF的门开着,但没人往里搬钱了。通道在,增量没有——这就像餐厅开着门,但厨房没菜了。你冲进去,只能吃空气。 第三件事:K线告诉你,1360是上沿,不是起点。 路径图给你看清楚: 9月26-27日:1697(顶) 10月1日:1482 10月3日:1271(底) 10月5日:1330 今天:低点1278,反抽到1360 关键位置: 上方:1360-1378是今日高点+供应重合带。站上1380→1410-1420。不放量站上1420,别谈1500。 下方:1330是昨天的价;1300心理位;1270-1280是结构生命线;跌破看1180-1200。 今天这根是下影反抽,量能一般,不是放量突破。 日线仍在从超买回落,短均线下压。 1360卡在箱体上沿。收在1378上方,才算脱离盒子;冲高回落,容易再看1300。你现在追进去,就是买在盒子的天花板上。 多空对决,你自己看 一边是: NU7测试网提前激活,技术面中期加分 ETF通道已打开(灰度ZCSH) 隐私叙事未被推翻,屏蔽池仍在 30天涨15%,强于BTC 一边是: 从1697回吐20%,高位筹码仍在出货 周一ETF净流出,增量资金消失 BTC卡在8.7万两次没过,大盘在失血 1360是箱体上沿,盈亏比极差 10月20日主网决定日=最大不确定性 关键位置1360,离生死线只差一步。 上方阻力:1360-1378(今日高点+供应带)→ 1410-1420 → 1480-1494 下方支撑:1330 → 1300 → 1270-1280(生命线) → 1180-1200 操作策略 激进型: 1360不追。 若一定要做,等回落到1310-1330再轻仓,止损1265,目标1375、1410。现价盈亏比太差,不值得赌。 稳健型: 等1270-1290再考虑,止损1235。更好的位置是1180-1220。没给到就拿小仓,别急。 突破型: 只有放量站稳1420、回踩不破1370,才考虑追,目标1480、1540。假突破直接放弃,别恋战。 空头: 1360-1380冲高无力可轻仓做回落,止损1405,目标1310、1280。不要在1270附近闷空——那是生命线,破了才追。 仓位铁律: 单笔风险不超过总资金2% 杠杆建议3-5倍,日振幅5-8%很常见 跌破1270并放量→下一档看1200、1180,先减仓 BTC跌破84500→ZEC同步降杠杆 10月20日若no-go或主网推迟→短线先砸预期 ZEC现在就像2021年5月的ETH—— 所有人都在喊“回调就是加仓机会”,结果从4300砸到1700。 1270破的那一天,你会发现: 原来不是ZEC不行,是你每次都在箱体上沿加杠杆。 现在能做的只有两件事:等1270确认,或等1420站稳。不是在日内高点FOMO。 $BTC $ETH $ZEC
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
BTC at $86,000, what are you waiting for? Today marks the one-year anniversary of BTC's all-time high of $126,000. Those who chased the peak a year ago have lost 32%, while those who called it a scam back then are now staring blankly at $86,000. The ETF suddenly turned negative yesterday, and BTC failed twice to break through $87,000—so is this the last escape window before the bull market ends, or is it a deliberate shakeout by the main players before the next major rally? Let's look at the surface: it’s up, but the rise feels unsettling. In the past 7 days, BTC rose from $83,000 to $86,000, but over 30 days it’s still in a correction phase. Yesterday during the Asian session, it surged to $87,000 but couldn’t hold, and today it’s hovering around $86,000. The 24-hour low was $85,000 and the high $86,100, a typical narrow-range consolidation. The candlestick chart reveals an awkward fact: the structure isn’t broken, but there’s no breakout either. $86,000 is stuck right in the middle between $85,000 and $87,000, unable to move up or down. The daily chart is still in an ascending channel, but the 4-hour chart has shifted from a surge to a contraction. Volume is even below the 5-day average—this is not a major rally, it’s waiting on data. First thing: the ETF turned negative yesterday, which is more damaging than anything else. From October 1 to 2, the spot ETF still saw an inflow of $290 million. But on Monday, there was a sudden net outflow of $90 million. ETH was even worse, with five consecutive days of outflows totaling $200 million. Does $90 million sound like a lot? In a $2.2 billion trading volume, it’s not much. But you need to understand the signal: the slope of capital flow has changed. In late September, ETFs still had a weekly net inflow of $2.4 billion, but now daily flows can be positive or negative. Although the cumulative net inflow is still $57.7 billion, the direction of incremental inflows has become unclear. In plain language: Big money hasn’t fled, but it’s no longer rushing in. They’ve started to wait. Retail investors fear not a crash, but this kind of indecisive "dull knife" movement—when it falls, they dare to buy the dip; when it rises, they dare to chase; but sideways just makes people question everything. Second thing: rate hike expectations are supporting the bottom, but barely. September’s nonfarm payrolls were weak, and the probability of a rate hike in October remains low. The Fed’s rate is stuck at 3.75%-4.00%, which on the surface looks friendly to risk assets. But look at two numbers: The 10-year US Treasury yield remains near 5.25% The dollar and oil prices are relatively strong What does this mean? Money is still expensive, and liquidity hasn’t truly loosened. BTC’s two failed attempts to break $87,000 aren’t technical issues, but a macro ceiling—no new rate cut expectations, no new liquidity narrative, so $86,000 is the reasonable current support level. The real turning point is the October rate meeting next week. Until then, $86,000 is the midpoint of the range, not the starting line. Third thing: anniversaries are the most dangerous traps. On October 6, 2025, BTC hit its all-time high of $126,000. Today is the one-year anniversary, and all media will revisit this event. Guess what retail investors will see? "BTC is down 32% from ATH"—panic "Those who bought at $126,000 a year ago are still underwater"—anxiety "Is the bull market over?"—self-doubt This is an emotional trap. The high from a year ago has nothing to do with today’s supply and demand. But the media needs a story, and retail investors need a reason—so the $86,000 midpoint will amplify volatility due to emotional swings. True seasoned traders never make buy or sell decisions based on an anniversary. Bull vs. bear showdown, you decide: On the bullish side: The post-halving supply contraction logic remains unchanged Corporate treasuries and ETFs still have long-term demand Hashrate is normal, network is healthy Daily structure intact, $83,000 life line not touched Cumulative $57.7 billion ETF net inflow shows institutions haven’t retreated On the bearish side: ETF turned negative yesterday, capital flow slope flattened Two failed attempts at $87,000, clear supply overhead 10-year Treasury yield at 5.25% suppresses risk appetite Anniversary media sentiment may trigger selling pressure Volume shrinking, upward momentum insufficient Key level $86,000, only $1,500 above the death line at $84,500. Resistance above: $86,500-$87,000 (5-day supply zone) → $87,500 (need volume to hold before talking $90,000) → $90,000-$92,000 Support below: $85,000-$85,500 (today’s low + platform) → $84,500 (key defense) → $83,000-$82,600 (late September low, structural life line) Daily close below $84,500 means short-term pullback. Only a volume-backed break above $87,500 signals the second leg up. Trading strategy (no fluff): Aggressive: Light long positions near $86,000, stop loss at $84,800. First target $86,800, second target $87,500. Reduce half at $86,500. Don’t be greedy. Conservative: Wait for $84,800-$85,200, stop loss at $83,800. Better entry is $83,000-$83,500. If not reached, take a small position, don’t force it. Breakout: Only consider chasing if volume-backed hold above $87,500 and pullback doesn’t break $86,500. Target $90,000. Abandon false breakouts, don’t fight the battle. Bearish: Light short on weak rallies at $86,800-$87,200, stop loss $87,800, targets $85,200 and $84,500. But don’t short near $84,500—that’s suicidal. Risk control priorities (memorize): Daily close below $84,500 → reduce positions, next target $83,000 If ETF net outflows continue → $86,000 likely to break down If October rate hike probability rises above 50% → deleverage first BTC now is like gold in 2023— Everyone is waiting for a "clear signal," but it’s been sideways for half a year, shaking off the impatient, then suddenly taking off. You don’t dare buy at $86,000. When it finally breaks out with volume above $92,000, will you once again regret missing out? It’s not that BTC doesn’t give you chances, it’s that you keep getting worn down inside the range, then chasing the breakout and getting trapped. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #本周美联储将公布9月会议纪要

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!