Post

峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
Show original
121美元的SOL,你要追吗? ETF上周只流入了80万美元,前一周是1.88亿。从1.88亿到80万,流入几乎归零。但SOL还在121硬撑,贴着117-125平台的上沿磨。这到底是蓄势突破,还是主力在悄悄撤退? 先看表面:日线多头还在,但买盘断了。 价格在全部主要均线之上,50日均线105,200日均线86。8月涨41%,9月涨15%,10月收成117-125平台。RSI在强势区,但不再扩张。24小时振幅只有2美元,缩量贴着121.9-122.7这道墙。 日线告诉你:多头没破。4小时告诉你:买盘没来。这就是最危险的状态。 第一件事:ETF流入断了,这是最扎心的信号。 前一周现货SOL ETF流入1.88亿美元,上一周只流入了80万。 从1.88亿到80万,不是放缓,是断崖。 累计净流入还在16亿以上,Bitwise的BSOL仍是大头,但连续流入的斜率断了。什么意思? 翻译成人话:以前每周有上亿新钱进来抬轿子,现在轿夫走了,只剩轿子里的人互相看着。 124上方为什么接不住?因为新钱不来了。光靠存量资金,推不动。 你可能会说,稳定币供应创新高173亿,RWA叙事还在,SEC给了代币化股票五年豁免,Solana是主要承接方。对,这些都是真的。 但这些都是中长期故事,不是这周的现货买盘。 基本面的问题是:网络在用,但代币不赚钱。 验证者拿走费用大头,代币持有人分成偏低。质押率接近70%,年化5%,锁仓支撑价格,不等于代币在捕获网络价值。 这不是SOL不行了,是定价逻辑变了:从"每周上亿流入"切回"流入能不能回来"。 第二件事:宏观不给独立行情的机会。 SOL和BTC同一套定价。10月加息概率从66%掉到22-40%,听起来是利好?但10年期美债还在5.3%附近,软数据没把长端打下来。 BTC在85200,卡在83000-87200箱体上半部。SOL最近一周几乎走平,24小时+1.4%,和BTC同步,没有独立行情。 后面三场硬事件等着:10月14日CPI、10月28日FOMC、10月29日PCE。 BTC有效跌破83800,SOL的117很难单独守住。 这不是危言耸听,这是高beta资产的宿命。大盘咳嗽,山寨发烧。 Alpenglow还没确认主网上线日。容错阈值从33%提到40%、验证者投票挪到链下——是中期故事,价格已经部分计价。利好出尽之前,先看能不能过124。 第三件事:技术面,缩量贴阻力,最怕突然放量砸。 10月2日123.8失败后,SOL在平台里收敛。121正在顶121.9-122.7这道近端墙,今日振幅只有2美元。 缩量贴阻力,不是蓄势,是犹豫。 关键位: 近端阻力:121.9-122.7 → 124-125(9月下旬前高)。站上125才看130,通道上沿135,叙事目标148还得先过125。 近端支撑:119.5 → 117-118 → 116.5。失守116.5才看113-114。 日线收盘站上125并守住,修复才升级。收盘跌破117,平台向下破,下一档116.5/113。 一天波动3-5美元很常见。121到117,或者121到125,都可能在一到两天内打到。 多空对决,你自己看 一边是: 日线多头结构完整,价格在全部主要均线之上 累计ETF净流入超16亿,机构通道已打开 稳定币173亿新高,RWA+代币化股票叙事真实 质押率70%,锁仓支撑价格 一边是: ETF周流入从1.88亿断崖到80万,边际买盘停了 代币持有人费用分成偏低,质押≠赚钱 124上方接不住,缩量贴阻力 BTC若破83800,SOL的117守不住 CPI/FOMC/PCE三场硬事件在即 操作策略 1. 不在121追多。 上面就是122.7/125。等4小时收盘站稳122.7并放量,再看124-125,止损收回120下方。站上125才谈130。在中间位置追多,是给主力送流动性。 2. 回踩做多。 优先等117-118出现止跌长下影,再分批接,止损放在115.5下方。第一目标回到122,站稳再看125。 3. 短线空只做受阻。 反抽124-125放量上影、4小时收不回去,轻仓空,止损放在126.5上方,目标119.5/117。不要在121中间猜顶,日线均线还在下面。 4. 失效条件。 日线收盘跌破117,多单撤退。ETF若继续接近零流入,125上方的突破单降权。BTC有效跌破83800,杠杆降下来。CPI之前不适合高杠杆过夜扛单。 你以为121是突破前夜,但你没看到ETF流入已经从1.88亿掉到80万。 等到它跌破117的那一天,你会发现: 不是SOL不行,是你把"没人买"当成了"蓄势待发"。 $BTC $ETH $SOL
峰哥的交易日记
峰哥的交易日记
NEAR at $4.85, do you dare to chase it? From 1.89 to 5.54 in one month, ETF net inflows of 52.8 million in the first three days, nearly tripled — but on-chain execution layer fees plunged from 120,000 per week to 20,000. Price is rising, business is shrinking. Are you chasing real demand or a castle in the air? First, look at the surface: doubling in a month, ridiculously strong. It was 1.89 on September 1, closed at 5.34 at the end of September, surged to 5.54 on October 1, now retracing to 4.85. Up 125% in 30 days, clearly stronger than BTC, showing relative strength from the AI + cross-chain narrative. Market cap around 6 billion, Binance perpetual positions at 257 million, up 4% in 24 hours, 8-hour funding rate +0.01% — bulls are paying. The candlesticks tell you: daily is still above all major moving averages, 50-day MA remains above 200-day MA, RSI dropped from above 70 to a strong 65 zone. Daily bulls are alive, short-term digesting overbought. First point: This rally is not about Gas business, but the "cross-chain solver". Many think NEAR is rising because on-chain activity returned. Big mistake. Execution layer fees dropped from about 120,000 per week at the start of 2025 to about 20,000 now. A drop of 83%. So why is the price rising? Because of NEAR Intents. Cross-chain transactions have accumulated over $27 billion, covering more than 30 chains, now accounting for about 85% of protocol revenue. Subsidies burning relay transactions are gone, native activity declined, and token burn has fallen from highs. In plain language: NEAR’s current valuation bets not on how many people use this chain, but on how much it can earn as a "cross-chain matching intermediary". The price is rising on the "solver," not "Gas." This narrative is good, but you need to know what you’re buying. Second point: The ETF is real, but its scale doesn’t explain the entire rise. Bitwise’s NEAR spot ETF (NRR) is trading on NYSE Arca, with net inflows of about $52.8 million in the first three trading days. The fund also stakes holdings to share yields with holders. This is a formal institutional channel, a long-term positive without question. But note — from 1.89 to 5.54, nearly tripled, market cap surged from 2 billion to 6 billion. Can $52.8 million explain this rise? No. So in this rally, the ETF is a catalyst, but the real driver is expectations: a supply reduction vote is on the way, a governance proposal aims to cut annual issuance from 2.5% to 1.6%, to be completed in 24 months, roughly reducing about 66 million NEAR tokens released. But this is an expectation; the vote is tentatively set for mid-October and not finalized. You’re buying not what has happened, but what hasn’t happened yet. Ponder this sentence three times. Third point: The technicals have reached a critical decision point. From 5.54 dropped to 4.55, tested bottom twice, today pulled back to 4.85. 4.85 is near the 7-day MA, just below the first resistance — this is the rebound center, not the main uptrend start. Daily ATR about 0.5-0.6 dollars, piercing two levels in one day is normal. The 4-hour retracement is not finished yet. Only two paths ahead: Daily close above 5.08 and hold → repair and upgrade, target 5.27-5.40, only talk 6.0 after surpassing 5.54 Close below 4.55 → this wave changes from "retracement" to "deeper correction," look at 4.47, deeper is the 4.00-4.10 moving average cluster 4.85 is neither a good long entry nor a good short entry. It’s the middle ground — the place most likely to get repeatedly slapped. Bull vs. bear, judge for yourself: On the bullish side: Daily bullish structure intact, 50-day MA above 200-day MA ETF formal channel open, 52.8 million inflow in first three days Intents cross-chain transactions over $27 billion, 85% of protocol revenue Supply reduction vote on the way, pre-implementation expectation Perpetual positions increasing, positive funding rate, bulls paying Doubled in a month, clearly stronger than BTC On the bearish side: 125% rise in 30 days, large profit-taking pressure On-chain execution layer fees plunged 83%, native activity down DeFi TVL just over 100 million, narrative ahead of on-chain lock-up Double resistance at 4.94/5.08, previous high 5.54 close but hard to break Supply cut still a proposal, vote may be rejected BTC in 83,000-87,200 range, breaking 83,800 high beta first retraces CPI/FOMC/PCE triple hit coming Key level 4.85, resistance above 4.94, support below 4.55. Resistance above: 4.94 → 5.08 → 5.27-5.40 → 5.54 (previous high) → 6.0 Support below: 4.71 → 4.55-4.64 (strong support) → 4.47 → 4.17 → 4.00-4.10 Trading strategy This is the rebound center, above is 4.94/5.08. Wait for 4-hour close to hold 5.08 with volume, then look at 5.27-5.40, stop loss below 4.78. Only talk 6.0 after surpassing 5.54. Chasing the middle is just giving money to the market. Buy on dips (better risk-reward): Prefer to wait for 4.55-4.64 to show a long lower shadow stop, then scale in, stop loss below 4.42. First target back to 4.94, hold then look at 5.08. Much better risk-reward than chasing 4.85. Short-term shorts only on resistance: Rebound 4.94-5.08 with volume upper shadow, 4-hour close can’t reclaim, light short, stop loss above 5.15, target 4.64/4.55. Don’t guess the top at 4.85 middle, daily MAs still below. Invalidation conditions (must remember): Daily close below 4.55 → exit longs Supply cut vote rejected → breakout above 5.08 downgraded BTC effectively breaks 83,800 → relative strength will be suppressed Not suitable for high leverage overnight before CPI NEAR leverage should be lower than BTC, single trade risk controlled within 1% of account. High volatility coin, over 5x leverage prone to liquidation. You think NEAR is rising on on-chain business, but it’s actually rising on ETF expectations + cross-chain narrative + supply cut imagination space $BTC $ETH $NEAR

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!